Hikvision Aspect Ration

[RBW]

Is the following correct please.

Hikvision 2Mp cameras display with a aspect ratio 4:3
Hikvision 3Mp cameras display with a aspect ratio 16:9

Both cameras are 1080p but as the 3mp camera covers more of the screen with a 16:9 aspect ratio this is where the extra pixels are.

What aspect ratio do Hikvision 4Mp, 5Mp & 8Mp use please?

Thank you.

 

[fenderman]

Is the following correct please.

Hikvision 2Mp cameras display with a aspect ratio 4:3
Hikvision 3Mp cameras display with a aspect ratio 16:9

Both cameras are 1080p but as the 3mp camera covers more of the screen with a 16:9 aspect ratio this is where the extra pixels are.

What aspect ratio do Hikvision 4Mp, 5Mp & 8Mp use please?

Thank you.

just divide the resolution...
16/9 is 1.77
1920/1080 is 1.77
try the others...

 

[RBW]

just divide the resolution...
16/9 is 1.77
1920/1080 is 1.77
try the others...

As per usual your answer is vague.

 

[fenderman]

As per usual your answer is vague.

As per usual I expect you to do some work...it's accurate...do some math..

 

[Bokeh]

you can look at resolutions in the specs for the cameras you are interested in, then use math or an aspect ratio calculator to get the ratio.

Hikvision USA


Aspect Ratio Calculator

 

[RBW]

As per usual I expect you to do some work...it's accurate...do some math..

The match is simple to understand. The result of 1.77 what does that mean? Not exactly an answer to the original question.

Please do not bother to reply.

 

[Bokeh]

The match is simple to understand. The result of 1.77 what does that mean? Not exactly an answer to the original question.

Please do not bother to reply.

that's the slower way.

basically its simplifying fractions to get the aspect ratio

what that user was suggesting is that if you divide 16 by 9 you get 1.7, so any resolution that you divide width by height for that results in 1.77 (1920/1080) would also be 16:9, so then you would also have to divide 4 by 3 and get 1.33, so any resolution you divide that results in 1.33 would also be 4:3 aspect ratio.

 

[fenderman]

The match is simple to understand. The result of 1.77 what does that mean? Not exactly an answer to the original question.

Please do not bother to reply.

1) dont tell me what to do on my forum.
2) if you are too dumb to understand, ask for more detail, dont insult someone for providing information...that is not how it works here.

 

[RBW]

1) dont tell me what to do on my forum.
2) if you are too dumb to understand, ask for more detail, dont insult someone for providing information...that is not how it works here.

wow, just wow.

 

[RBW]

that's the slower way.

basically its simplifying fractions to get the aspect ratio

what that user was suggesting is that if you divide 16 by 9 you get 1.7, so any resolution that you divide width by height for that results in 1.77 (1920/1080) would also be 16:9, so then you would also have to divide 4 by 3 and get 1.33, so any resolution you divide that results in 1.33 would also be 4:3 aspect ratio.

That's great thank you.

 

[fenderman]

wow, just wow.

You can dish it out like an asshole with your snarky remarks, but cant believe I responded in kind? I owe you nothing. What the hell did you expect the response to "As per usual your answer is vague" to be?

 

[RBW]

You can dish it out like an asshole with your snarky remarks, but cant believe I responded in kind? I owe you nothing. What the hell did you expect the response to "As per usual your answer is vague" to be?

It's ok Bokeh has explained fully. I struggled to understand but with a little guidance I now do understand. Not sure why you've called me an asshole.

Thank you for putting me on the right track on your forum.

The reason for the original question is that I thought that a 3Mp image was larger than a 2Mp I.e different aspect ratio. The same pixels per inch but bigger image. Still not sure where the extra pixels are though. May of been dumb of me not to know this.

However with your calculations it seems it is not. Thank you.

 

[fenderman]

It's ok Bokeh has explained fully. I struggled to understand but with a little guidance I now do understand. Not sure why you've called me an asshole.

Thank you for putting me on the right track on your forum.

The reason for the original question is that I thought that a 3Mp image was larger than a 2Mp I.e different aspect ratio. The same pixels per inch but bigger image. Still not sure where the extra pixels are though. May of been dumb of me not to know this.

However with your calculations it seems it is not. Thank you.

WRONG...with my calculations you will see that the 3mp is not 16:9...
You were called an asshole because you are one....you insult me then are surprised that I shoved it back in your face.

 

[RBW]

WRONG...with my calculations you will see that the 3mp is not 16:9...
You were called an asshole because you are one....you insult me then are surprised that I shoved it back in your face.

OK i get this now it's been a long day.

 

[RBW]

You were called an asshole because you are one

*btw it takes one to know one