Yeah, that's how I started too. Over time as I added more and more cameras it forced a decision of either starting to reduce some FPS on cameras or throwing money towards adding more hard drive space.
For me, it wasn't worth spending more money on HDD space when the only benefit was cars in front of my house moving buttery smooth across the screen. Dropping the FPS to 15 was no big deal, especially when considering anytime I needed something for a "security purpose" usually involved taking a screenshot of a single frame. The image quality of a single frame at 15 FPS is no different than the image quality of a single frame at 30 FPS (going back to
@pozzello's thought a few posts up).
From what I've seen from being a member here over the past several years, most of the seasoned folks run their cameras at slower FPS like 15, whereas most folks new to IPC come in wanting to run their cameras at maximum FPS (30 for the US, 25 for the rest of the world).
Like you said, it's all subjective. But when folks with a low post history drop comments like "Good luck wth accepting 15fps domain", it makes me wonder if they understand that FPS and image quality don't go hand in hand.