I believe I need to add 1 or more cameras in order to detect at further distances than the IPC-PDW5849-A180-E2-ASTE is picking up.
Looking at various cameras, I was thinking that a camera like the IPC-HDW5442T-ZE without the variable-focal would be worth looking at.
I found the IPC-HDW5442TM-ASE and after reviewing the specs, it seems that it is indeed the same camera without vari-focal.
Based on what I have seen playing with the 5442T-ZE and the article The Importance of Focal Length over MP in camera selection | IP Cam Talk, it seems to me that there is not much of a reason to go with the 5442TM-ASE, since it is only about $35 cheaper, but I wanted to get the opinions of those that have used both.
So, is there any compelling reason(s) to go with the IPC-HDW5442TM-ASE rather than the IPC-HDW5442T-ZE?
Thanks,
Eric
Looking at various cameras, I was thinking that a camera like the IPC-HDW5442T-ZE without the variable-focal would be worth looking at.
I found the IPC-HDW5442TM-ASE and after reviewing the specs, it seems that it is indeed the same camera without vari-focal.
Based on what I have seen playing with the 5442T-ZE and the article The Importance of Focal Length over MP in camera selection | IP Cam Talk, it seems to me that there is not much of a reason to go with the 5442TM-ASE, since it is only about $35 cheaper, but I wanted to get the opinions of those that have used both.
So, is there any compelling reason(s) to go with the IPC-HDW5442TM-ASE rather than the IPC-HDW5442T-ZE?
Thanks,
Eric