Memory Leak
- Thread starter GodLucs
- Start date
Gargoile
Getting comfortable
Flintstone61
Known around here
Flintstone61
Known around here
BI is using a maximum of 15% memory without the bridge.
When the bridge is made, it consumes up to 100% memory until the server crashes.
The memory isn't released until the server is restarted - not even restarting BI services releases it.
Gargoile
Getting comfortable
We assume they are the same. Could one be ethernet and the other token-ring
j/k
Gargoile
Getting comfortable
looney2ns
IPCT Contributor
If you shut down BI, does the same thing occur when it's not running?
tangent
IPCT Contributor
- May 12, 2016
- 4,641
- 3,995
Could you describe in more detail what you think you've done. Include details like the subnet and ip address used by each adapter, make of the adapter, and exactly how you're bridging the networks. A little detail about your personal understanding of networking could help too.
Have you looked at task manager, are you certain BI is what's consuming the resources?
Last edited:
Everything is up to date. BIOS, network drivers etc.
It's runnning on a Windows Server 2012 Standard.
No, if I shut down BI it doesn't consumes memory till the server crash.
Our server has 64Gb Memory, if I, for example, close BI service with 32GB Ram utilized, it stabilizes the memory on 32Gb.
Of course.
Two adapters
When I bridge both connections it creates a virtual adapter with those two connections merged.
And theres not much configuration I can do with it, but set the IP, Net Mask, Gateway and DNS Servers I want.
Netmask: 255.255.192.0
The task manager doesn't show all the memory consumption being the BI service, but honestly it's the only thing running on this server and if I close BI service and let the server run by itself the memory stabilizes as it should.
Rn I bridged the networks again, soon the memory will reach 50% again:
Mike A.
Known around here
- May 6, 2017
- 4,199
- 7,066
What happens if you don't bridge and just run the two networks and BI? Still die over time?
No it doesn't, just tested it.
Working with both network adapters at the same time (unbridged) and the memory is stabilized on 16%
What is the point in bridging them - what are you trying to accomplish?
With 64 cameras working simultaneously the network throughput is a lot. When bridging two network adapters I have double the performance.
IAmATeaf
Known around here
Your screenshot shows one of the NICs disabled? So with it disabled what is the point unless that was just an example?
Sphinxicus
Getting comfortable
It is possible that stopping BI is showing the symptom of increasing memory usage dissapear because by doing so you have reduced the amount of traffic on the interface. Can you generate the same amount of throughput over the bridged interface without using BI and see if the same issue occurs?
Does the above image show your baseline with all your 64 cameras running? Obviously the above is nowhere near saturating a Gigabit link. 81 Megabit/s = 0.081 Gigabits/s. What is the total value in the Status Window > Cameras Tab in BI (gives a total value in bottom left)?
Also, when you bridged your interfaces in what i assume was a Link Aggregation/Bond configuration, did you create the reciprocal LAGG on the two switch interfaces that your host is cabled into so as not to end up with a layer 2 loop?
Last edited:
