Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?

Another fraudulent lying headline. He points out a theory that's being discussed, and the headline claims he's personally backing it as a known fact.

RFK Jr. says COVID was ‘ethnically targeted’ to spare Jews

What the story actually says that he said:

"may have been “ethnically targeted” "
"Kennedy floated the idea "
"There is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. "
"We don’t know whether it was deliberately targeted or not "
"there are papers out there that show the racial or ethnic differential and impact "
 
Well, this is kind of weird coming from a Presidential candidate. Clearly, a bio weapon would be useful if you could specifically target certain groups but I'd be surprised if this technology has advanced this far.

Read the whole thread--- REALLY good.
 
................, and certain genes dictate certain ethnic traits, why couldn't they target those too? Of course they would. Be it China or US designing a bio weapon, do you not think they'd take into consideration targeting so as to minimize risk of a backfire?

uh Yup
 
And as more and more leaks come out, its gets worse and worse. We KNEW they were lying, the DEPTH of the lies is astounding.

The Fact-Check Racket Finally Unravels
The Fact-Check Racket Finally Unravels | ZeroHedge

......Three days ago, a data maven who writes for Brownstone revealed a first look at some numbers he had been crunching over the CDC’s listing of COVID as cause of death. He initially sent the results to a private email list and I suggested we go with what he had discovered as an initial look.

He had death certificates from Missouri and Massachusetts and was able to cross-check them with the same once they got into the hands of the CDC. He found thousands of instances in which COVID was not listed as cause of death in the coroner’s report but it was added directly by the CDC. The scale of the problem is vast. The implications of this are rather ominous. We’ve been relying on CDC data for three-plus years to understand the scope of COVID’s mortality.

“The worst pandemic in 100 years,” they kept saying, and that might be true. But obviously the claim is highly contingent on correctly marking the cause-of-death codes. What Aaron Hertzberg found is that the CDC was changing the code to inflate the numbers. By how much it is hard to say but based on the data so far, this is a very serious problem with awesome implications for how we understand what happened to us.

The immediate question concerns the decision-making at the CDC. We know that Deborah Birx, coronavirus task force coordinator, said from the podium that they would mark every death with COVID as being from COVID. That was in the spring of 2020 and had already set off alarm bells. Changing the cause of death to COVID from something else is next-level crazy.

Under whose authority did the CDC act? Birx was not in charge of the CDC. Indeed, her power and status was always unclear. No question that she came to the White House by recommendation of Matthew Pottinger of the National Security Council. Also we know for certain that from March 13, 2020, onward, the NSC was the lead agency with the CDC reduced to operations. If the CDC had faced some formal order to mark COVID as cause of death regardless of what state certificates said, no one has ever seen such an order.

The implications of all of this are rather ominous. And keep in mind that this discovery was not made by a whistleblower or a specialist in this field but an obsessive data maven from the citizen world who has a passion to get to the truth. If he is right, the documentation here implies a level of treachery that even I had not considered.

I saw two reactions to the article once published.

The most common reaction was that this is nothing new. Everyone knew this was happening the whole time. We saw the death numbers go up and up from COVID and equally down for every other cause. It was pretty clear that there was something fishy going on. So some people said that there is nothing surprising here. The CDC is capable of any degree of malfeasance.


At this point, it’s reasonable to assume that nearly every official source on the virus was wrong or lying for years now.

You probably know this. In any case, my intuition here is that we are only at the beginning of discovery of the fullness of the duplicity.

The stakes are very high: American liberty suffered a grave blow during the COVID response.

If the reason wasn’t the virus, what was it then?

Original article from The Epoch Times
The Fact-Check Racket Finally Unravels
 
Last edited:
I was wandering around the wasteland of Twitter, and this item randomly popped up. Preliminary research that shows Ivermectin at low doses makes chemo more effective, opening a pathway for it to kill cancer cells.



The research is interesting-- but VERY early work in a lab. One of the chemo drugs they tested with IVM is Doxorubicin, aka Red Devil, which is harsh as all hell itself but Very effective-- if it can be tolerated. They wear hazmat suits when administering it-- and 70% of people can't tolerate its severe side effects, or it obliterates the immune system and they have to discontinue use. Imagine if a much more tolerable dose could be used because IVM creates a new pathway for that chemo to get in and kill cancer cells....

1690053413521.png

The research:


This research was published PRE-COVID in June, 2019.
 
Last edited:
Nonsense!
My own government, multiple agencies including CDC, NIH, the White House, and Lord Anthony Fraudci told me it was horse paste and had no medicinal value
About 2 months ago I took a light dose of Ivermectin as a preventative-- 18 mg for my 230-ish pounds. Within a few days I developed a side-effect of some itchiness and really horrible dandruff and scalp itch. I read that it was a possible, albeit atypical, side-effect. Still dealing with some of that. When it was the worst-- my wife said it looked like cradle cap on a baby. I was going to do 18mg every 4~6 months, but I will need to do some more reading.
 
Had not heard of that side affect... I took it for what? 14-15 months. The preventative dose for me was like 12mg per week. I'm now taking 12-18mg 1x p/mo

Wife took it when she came down with the flu back in summer of '22. We did the 30-36mg per day for 3-5 days? (followed FLCCC protocol at the time, have to go back and look) then cut her back to 12mg 1x p/wk. It did seem to make her case mild. Neither of us experienced any side effects.
 
No side affects here either, also those in our family who have taken it has not reported any. Crazy but most all the Big Pharma Meds I have taken and have been on have given me some kind of side affect but not Iver...

My worse was dizziness/cramps from Statins...

I know Meds affects people differently.
 
No side affects here either, also those in our family who have taken it has not reported any. Crazy but most all the Big Pharma Meds I have taken and have been on have given me some kind of side affect but not Iver...

My worse was dizziness/cramps from Statins...

I know Meds affects people differently.
Yeah--- I was surprised at that. Maybe it's not an actual side effect and I just got some scalp condition by coincidence, though i have not had anything like that since I was an oily teenager. Well-- perhaps in early November I will repeat that dose and see if the itch repeats.
 
NothingToSeeHere.PNG

LeBron James' son, Bronny, was rushed to a hospital after suffering cardiac arrest during a basketball workout, TMZ Sports has learned.

A James family spokesperson tells TMZ Sports ... "Yesterday while practicing Bronny James suffered a cardiac arrest. Medical staff was able to treat Bronny and take him to the hospital. He is now in stable condition and no longer in ICU. We ask for respect and privacy for the James family and we will update media when there is more information."