Don't think so. He states that in the CRJ you can hear the tower telling the helo to go behind the CRJ.It's a combined transcript of both the CRJ and VH60
Don't think so. He states that in the CRJ you can hear the tower telling the helo to go behind the CRJ.It's a combined transcript of both the CRJ and VH60
I can understand how the CRJ did not see the blackhawk. They were intensely focused on runway 33. But, I just don't see how the blackhawk did not see the CRJ from a fair distance out before impact. It feels like impact was purposeful. And my imagination envisions a pretty dark purposeful action taken by the pilot prior to impact to include a couple of other planned actions well before the point of impact. I hope I'm wrong.
At best, that would be extremely irresponsible to be hauling ass in a configuration that limits visibility in a highly congested air corridor looking downward when air traffic is not on the ground. NVG would do nothing when looking toward the ground so it's a mute point regarding NVG.I don't know the speed the blackhawk was flying, but it appeared to be hauling, in which case it would have been nose down and thus a reduced upwards visibility that would have prevented seeing a descending plane?
Ah, so they only have the CRJ CVR/FDR and ATC recordings. I thought I read they have the VH60 recorders.Don't think so. He states that in the CRJ you can hear the tower telling the helo to go behind the CRJ.
So, you would need a ground speed of 300 knots to travel 5 nautical miles in 60 seconds.
For a VH-60 helicopter to achieve a forward airspeed of 120 knots at sea level with no crosswind, the pitch angle would typically be around 5 to 10 degrees nose down. This is a general estimate and can vary based on specific conditions and configurations.
It could be a case of target fixation. They said they had the traffic in sight, but many pilots on the internet think that they had confused the other plane which was further out for the CRJ. If that was the case, they were fixed on that plane and just did not notice the CRJ?But, I just don't see how the blackhawk did not see the CRJ from a fair distance out before impact.
I don't disagree, it's just that there are many plausible scenarios. The lady was likely controlling the stick, and for somebody without extensive in-type experience any little distraction like a sneeze, tuning the radio, checking position, fixating on a reading other than altitude, making a heading change, etc. could result in a quick untended hop up a hundred feet before it was noticed. Sure the other crew would speak up to avoid a collision, but what if they were all looking at the wrong target? I read that more info is set to be released tomorrow.Everyone seems to be focusing on the female, but just because she was PIC, does not mean she had total authority. After all it was a training mission and she was the one being trained, I think. The other pilot and the crew chief would not just sit by and let her fly into the CRJ.
You take port, I'll take starboard.
You take port, I'll take starboard.
Could change your mind about DEI if were indeed this way and you could be the navigator.You take port, I'll take starboard.