Progressive Liberal Hypocrisy

Progressives ain't gonna like this one ..

You can tell it's Mattel because it's swell ..


 
and even a horse ..

 
1742381936583.png1742382327390.png
 

Attachments

  • 1742382303660.png
    1742382303660.png
    351.6 KB · Views: 0
  • Haha
Reactions: Sybertiger
^^^^

What do people think they accomplish vandalizing Tesla's... I imagine the insurance companies are the ones who bear the cost... and Tesla gets more business.

Selling a Tesla you already own... what will that accomplish?

If someone wants to protest Musk, just don't buy a new Tesla.
 
^^^^

What do people think they accomplish vandalizing Tesla's... I imagine the insurance companies are the ones who bear the cost... and Tesla gets more business.

Selling a Tesla you already own... what will that accomplish?

If someone wants to protest Musk, just don't buy a new Tesla.

If someone really wants to protest Musk, they should buy a Diesel Truck ..
 
 
For those who blame Islamic Fundamentalism on the West, pay attention to history ..

 
Gmftm0GaUAAK5uh
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sybertiger

There's more to this, as many leading Universities are research universities, and make a pile of money off patents ..

Remember Cisco came out of Stanford ..
Remember the Internet came out of many Universities ..

So the real question is ROI and what type of staff do you have ?
What type of programs do you have ?

PhDs in AI / Robotics good
PhDs in DEI / CRT / LGTQ+ not good
 
There's more to this, as many leading Universities are research universities, and make a pile of money off patents ..
Like so many other stats, the data was probably warped to fit the desired result, but for playing make believe that it's correct, it does say it's for "public schools". But nitpicking even deeper, it states the enrollment number was for public schools, and the other numbers were for "educational staffing". One could make a whole bunch of different misleading graphs from those parameters, without technically lying.
 
Like so many other stats, the data was probably warped to fit the desired result, but for playing make believe that it's correct, it does say it's for "public schools". But nitpicking even deeper, it states the enrollment number was for public schools, and the other numbers were for "educational staffing". One could make a whole bunch of different misleading graphs from those parameters, without technically lying.

Opening up the graphic I see this is for "elementary and secondary schools"

up 138 % .. could mean 1970 you had one nurse and one security guard and one gardener .. hire one more security guard and that's up 133% .. so indeed we need to know a lot more here
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigerwillow1