Reolink is a joke

bp2008

Staff member
Mar 10, 2014
12,770
14,297
USA
A couple months ago one of my relatives bought a pair of Reolink turret cameras. Somehow he thought I had recommended them :eek:. I told him he should return them. He didn't. So now here I am with one of them to see if it will be useful.

Hardware

The entire mount is made of plastic. I have never handled a turret with such a loose mount before, and there is no tightening mechanism. Even the cheapest Dahua turret with a plastic mount holds the camera much more securely in position than this. It is probably secure enough to withstand high winds, but not vandal resistant in any sense. The camera can be easily repointed or detached entirely from its mount with a simple twist at the base.

Firmware

It was on DHCP by default, and the web interface loaded just fine. This came with firmware v1.0.266 on it based on the page title.

The default user name is "admin" and the default password is blank. It did not prompt for me to change it.

UPnP was surprisingly not enabled by default, but a "UID" thing was enabled by default and I believe that is their cloud backdoor service which I did not investigate further. I just turned it off. I did not verify that it wasn't making outgoing connections (it almost certainly still was).

NTP (network time protocol) settings do not allow you to enter a custom address, you can only choose from a dropdown. This means no NTP without internet access unless you point the camera at a custom DNS server which you run to redirect something like time.windows.com to your own local NTP server.

The video player in the web interface works without plugins (in Chrome) and seems to be surprisingly good at CPU efficiency. But it sucks in other ways. You apparently have to log out and back in to switch between the main and sub streams (which reolink calls "clear" and "fluent" streams). There's also a third stream option called "balanced" which I have no idea about because it is not configurable in the web UI.

Stream configuration


1624631795280.png

That is all of it. No codec choice, no VBR/CBR choice, no i-frame interval, no "smart codec" or "h.264+" or anything like that exposed. The main stream could go up to 30 FPS. The sub stream maxed out at 15 FPS.

Blue Iris' ONVIF inspect found the main and sub streams.

Configured this way, Blue Iris reports the sub stream only manages 13 FPS and the i-frame intervals do not match between main and sub streams. Not good if wanting to use this camera with Blue Iris especially with dual streaming (running main and sub streams).

1624631386481.png

Image configuration

This is pretty barebones as well, but covers most of the basics as long as you don't want to adjust noise reduction strength.

1624632672446.png

The Exposure setting at least looks serviceable, if not amazing since it maxes out at 125ms shutter time which is not long enough for a great weather cam, and doesn't offer options for shutter speed faster than 1ms. It is not unheard of to set an LPR camera to 1/2000 shutter speed, and you wouldn't be able to do that here. Not that you would want to use a Reolink camera for LPR anyway.

1624632799864.png
1624632775447.png
1624632788244.png
1624632749043.png

Audio

I don't know if this camera is supposed to have audio, but enabling it in the web interface and in Blue Iris config, I could not hear anything. In fact it might have just stalled the streams...

1624633080646.png


Conclusion

1624633138859.png
 
Last edited:
I will post a link in this thread as well

 
  • Like
Reactions: sebastiantombs
In all seriousness, I think I understand the issues well enough that these cameras will get used. But if they aren't reliable then I am not going to spend much time fighting them.
 
This is an example from their marketing videos - do you see a person in this picture...yes, there is a person in this picture. This is why you cannot buy any system that you cannot change the shutter speed or control any other parameter. Could this provide anything useful for the police? The still picture looks great though except for the person and the blur of the vehicle... Will give you a hint - the person is in between the two columns:


1613251115189.png



Bad Boys
Bad Boys
Watcha gonna do
Watcha gonna do
When the camera can't see you
 
The price should be a huge clue that you are getting a product that has serious cuts and compromises in features, quality. functionality, etc


I don't think this is getting enough attention. A sub $40 camera shouldn't perform as well as an $80-100 camera, right?

An F150 and a ranger have different applications and different price points to come with them. Some people need a ranger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bp2008
Nobody needs a camera that is totally useless at night which Reolink is. They show nice still captures and when they do show motion it's so blurred you my as well not waste the money, time and effort putting their cameras up in the first place. Been there, done that, once. Never again.
 
I tried a lot of cameras...... Ended up with Dahua and no problems since.
No more rebooting, lost the fixed ip, default setting or just bad picture during night/ir.


And EmpireTecAndy delivers worldwide FAST, impressing !

BlueIris and Dahua ... Happy life :) Just works, no hassle.

(Still use bad/cheap cameras for nonimportant views)
Like this, my ratcam new use to see when the wildhog bait food is ready:

1624652916107.png

Brgds TheSwede
 
Last edited: