South Carolina Homeowner Shoots Intruder

awsum140

Known around here
Joined
Nov 14, 2017
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
1,128
Location
Southern NJ
We're also talking a bar and some States have restrictions that cover off duty carry in a bar. Basically makes a bar a "gun free zone" and shooting gallery for anyone whose crazy enough. Robert Heinlein, scifi author, had a great line.."An armed society is a polite society."
 

J Sigmo

Known around here
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Messages
997
Reaction score
1,335
I think even us gun enthusiasts must agree that a gun is a dangerous device designed for a purpose that makes it extremely helpful or useful for someone bent on murder and mayhem.

Many devices are like that, though, and there are many ways that someone can attack an unprotected "soft" target. Vehicles, knives, bombs, "powders", gasses, arson, etc., seem to be used frequently by people to carry out these sorts of attacks (or fake attacks).

Nonetheless, guns are often used in these attacks for a number of reasons. Still it always seems that the outcry to ban something is only heard when it is a gun that is used. You never hear any outcry to ban trucks or cars or other useful devices even though they can be misused for mayhem.

And call me paranoid, but it ends up seeming that some of those calling for a ban on guns are not actually worried about saving innocent lives as much as they are trying to further an agenda of disarming the average citizen.

I do understand how guns, by doing their job well, make them very attractive to someone wishing to perpetrate such an attack. The very characteristics that make a gun good for defense, hunting, target shooting, etc., are likely to make it effective for a "bad guy" as well.

Then again, an automatic transmission makes a huge truck accessible to anyone, even a bad guy. Should we ban that feature because it makes it easy for a criminal to use when committing a mass murder?

Of course none of us want to see would-be terrorists or unbalanced people aided in their crimes by highly efficient, well-designed arms or devices of any sort.

But many of us strongly feel that a well-armed citizenry is desirable to help assure that tyranny cannot easily come to power. Distributing effective weapons among the general population seems prudent, and should have a moderating effect on would-be tyrants as well as criminals. We see throughout history that the first step undertaken by despots who want to rule unopposed is to disarm the population. So a lot of people see disarmament of the population as a huge red-flag, and tend to distrust those in government who push for this.

But if we accept that we do not wish to disarm the masses because having the masses armed is such a good check against a tyrannical government and against rampant unopposed crime, etc., then, as we are discussing above, the real problem becomes how to prevent people from committing undesirable acts aided by the very devices we tout as being the means of protecting us all from evil.

And that is a problem that is not easy to solve. Someone bent on hurting others can find innumerable ways to accomplish mass injury or murder.

I am always saddened when one of these attacks is carried out, regardless of the weapon used.

But it is particularly troubling to me when they choose to use a gun because it not only helps them with their destructive purpose, but also gives those who would prefer to see the citizens disarmed another anecdote they can use to further that agenda. And the gun-grabbers surely seem to love it when a mass shooting takes place. They gleefully grasp at these incidents to further their agenda of disarmament. But they never seem to come up with any solutions that might actually help curb such incidents.
 

looney2ns

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
15,633
Reaction score
22,880
Location
Evansville, In. USA
Most anti gunners don't understand that an extremely small percentage of legal gun owners ever commit an evil act. You know murder is against the law allready, but doesn't seem to deter many.
We have hundreds of gun laws on the books that are NOT being enforced.

Once upon a time we had a mental health system that might have helped curb incidents in todays world.

The news media needs to stop ever mentioning the bad guys name or anything else about him, ever. And not obsessively report on the incident for a week.

Not to be callous, but more people are killed in one summer weekend in south Chicago than in this last incident. Where's the outcry there?

A moto often repeated "always carry, never tell".

Now it's revealed that the gunman paused to post on facebook....the perfect time to have taken him down.

Since most all of these attacks occur in gun free zones, that's a place to start, as some schools already have.

Great post @J Sigmo
 
Last edited:

TonyR

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
16,754
Reaction score
39,010
Location
Alabama
To me a gun free zone is the same philosophy as never locking your house or car and putting a sign on them saying everything is unlocked. It's nothing more than an invitation for those wanting to do evil to do their thing.
Yep, Same reason why I don't open carry in a state where it's allowed unless specifically prohibited under certain conditions....I don't want to announce to some nut job "Hey, shoot me first!"

I carry concealed EVERYWHERE except the county courthouse and the VA...those are clearly posted at the entrance "NO Guns, Knives or weapons of any kind allowed on these premises".

I must confess however.....it wasn't with me when I got my colonoscopy a couple of months back....no where to conceal it! :wow:
 

J Sigmo

Known around here
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Messages
997
Reaction score
1,335
Yep. Open carry has been legal here for as long as I can remember. But I never "carried" except to go shooting, until concealed carry became legal even without a permit.

Why give up the tactical advantage of surprise? And why risk making people nervous if they're the type to be made nervous when seeing that someone is carrying? (Not that many people here are skittish about guns).

I'm not totally opposed to open carry. It just doesn't fit me most of the time.

When they made it legal here for anyone who can legally possess a gun to carry concealed without a permit, it made a lot of things less complicated. Before that, it was always something of a puzzle to be sure you were not breaking any law when you loaded up some guns to go out shooting in the boonies or went to the range, etc.

Even if you never really "carry", it is a lot more convenient for shooters, hunters, etc. And it is less hassle for police, game wardens, etc.
 

gordo

Pulling my weight
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
252
Reaction score
186
Regarding bans, we all know how well bans/outlawing have worked on heroin, cocaine etc. If people really want something, they will find a way.
 

smithb

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Messages
104
Reaction score
151
Location
USA
Not to be callous, but more people are killed in one summer weekend in south Chicago than in this last incident. Where's the outcry there? @J Sigmo
To further your point... last year when that Florida high school got shot up and everyone was crusading to stop gun violence because 17 people died... over 3000 people died in that same week in the US alone due to the common flu. I do a lot of travelling and I haven't seen even a single PSA on preventing the spread of the flu. You'd think if they really wanted to save some lives they'd hand out face masks or hand sanitizer at the airport. Maybe if dying from the flu was more gruesome or emotional it might get more attention...
 

J Sigmo

Known around here
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Messages
997
Reaction score
1,335
To further your point... last year when that Florida high school got shot up and everyone was crusading to stop gun violence because 17 people died... over 3000 people died in that same week in the US alone due to the common flu. I do a lot of travelling and I haven't seen even a single PSA on preventing the spread of the flu. You'd think if they really wanted to save some lives they'd hand out face masks or hand sanitizer at the airport. Maybe if dying from the flu was more gruesome or emotional it might get more attention...
Amen to that! The lack of any awareness of how disease spreads is another pet peeve of mine.

Schools give "Perfect Attendance awards". Businesses think highly of people who persevere and come in sick.

And yet, that's exactly the thoughtless, selfish, dangerous, antisocial behavior that should be discouraged.

If I ran a school, if someone came in sick, they'd be suspended and get "F" grades in all of their classes or any tests scheduled for that day.

Come in sick to my business, endangering the other employees, and wrecking our overall productivity by infecting my workforce, and you're fired!

Endangering everyone else at a business, school, or in public is borderline criminal.

But back to the subject at hand:

You make a good point that people's perceptions of danger, and ability to assess risk is horrible.

Over 5,000 people die every day from smoking related causes. Less people than that were killed in the 9-11 attacks. And yet, we've engaged in a decades-long war over that. But do we do much of anything about smoking? 5,000 people per DAY! But the slow, gruesome ways people die from smoking aren't nearly as dramatic or "Breaking News" worthy, I guess.

Now we have "The Opioid Crisis". But how many is it killing? Probably not anywhere near as many as cigarettes.

News outlets and politicians love to get all worked up about all of those "gun deaths". But the statistics are weak, especially when you subtract suicides and legitimate police or citizen shootings of bad guys, and criminals shooting each other.

As a normal law-abiding citizen, your chances of being killed by one of these shooters of innocent people is remote in the extreme. Yet the media and gun-grabbers make it sound like it's an epidemic while staunchly ignoring the real epidemics surrounding us.

Wear your seat belt. Quit or don't start smoking. Watch your diet and get some exercise. Get a flu shot. Wash your hands after going out shopping. Now you've covered 99% of your risks.

Being shot in one of these random shootings is so far down on the list of actual risks that we face as to be trivial at best. A risk unworthy of wasting even seconds of your day considering.

And yet, what dominates the news?

Anything spectacular. Plane crashes, shootings, flaming bus plunges. If it bleeds, it leads. :)

It's always been that way, I guess. People love anything sensational. And the media makes its money by keeping people tuned in. So we get the news we want.

 

TonyR

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
16,754
Reaction score
39,010
Location
Alabama
Endangering everyone else at a business, school, or in public is borderline criminal.
Yep...I used to send one of my 2 guys home every so often for that reason. One would come in, spewing and hacking, could hardly do any work, sick as a dog. I'd tell them they'd get no brownie points from me and that when I was out sick (not often then, I had 700 hours of sick time on the books when I retired) you can bet your a$$ that I WAS genuinely ill and likely felt so bad the last thing I cared about was what anybody thought about me taking sick time!

Over 5,000 people die every day from smoking related causes. Less people than that were killed in the 9-11 attacks. And yet, we've engaged in a decades-long war over that. But do we do much of anything about smoking? 5,000 people per DAY! But the slow, gruesome ways people die from smoking aren't nearly as dramatic or "Breaking News" worthy, I guess.
I smoked for 22 years, been quit for 31 (since '87) and very glad I quit. My wife was a RN for 26 years and says she guesstimates that 75% of the people she administered to or was involved with in this area were due to complications from smoking, especially COPD.
Wear your seat belt. Quit or don't start smoking. Watch your diet and get some exercise. Get a flu shot. Wash your hands after going out shopping. Now you've covered 99% of your risks.
And look both ways before crossing the street. Don't text or look down at you phone while driving. Pay attention. You're piloting 2 tons of vehicle at 35 to 75 MPH in close proximity to other folks doing the same thing. It's like NASCAR without the fun or the payday!

And don't go to the doctor unless you are REALLY bad off! Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in the U.S.
So are we going to close the hospitals? Suspend doctors' from performing surgeries, prescribing medicines and practicing medicine?
Of course not!

And yet, what dominates the news?
Anything spectacular. Plane crashes, shootings, flaming bus plunges. If it bleeds, it leads. :)
Sad but true. But the day that a terrorist ran over and killed 8 on a NYC sidewalk with a rented Home Depot truck, the most covered "news" of the day by our "unbiased and fair" media outlets?.....the large number of diet sodas consumed daily by President Trump. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Top