Ukraine related: Was Ukraine Government Is Handing Out Guns To Citizens, What Happened to Gun Control?

The most important question to ask, why do neutral countries like Sweden and Finland want to join NATO after Russia attacked Ukraine.
Why does the Baltic States want to join NATO ?
Why does other eastern Bloc states want to join NATO ?
I posted something that I thought was a neutral report on how each side views the situation, without taking any stand on it myself. My getting sucked into the debate will be short lived. Possible answers to the questions:
(1) The answer you want, that these states are afraid that if Russia wins anything in Ukraine, they will be next.
(2) They're falling for the fear-mongering western propaganda that the western governments and press are promoting.
(3) The western governments have strong-armed them into joining NATO to reinforce the propaganda.

I don't believe any of the crap I'm hearing in the media or in the Internet. All I know is my own conclusion that the USA wouldn't allow Canada or Mexico to join the Warsaw pact, and the Cuban missile crisis is a historical example to support that claim.
 
McMaster shows his expertise ..

Change and Continuity in War | HISPBC w/ H.R. McMaster - Pt. 1


Change and Continuity in War | HISPBC w/ H.R. McMaster - Pt. 2
 
1740182433069.png
 
It should be clear to everyone that the USA makes for a very unreliable ally, as most of those in the EU ( who have been spending more that the Americans .. yes, you can verify this ) now basically feel a high level of distrust to the USA

" .. It is difficult to overstate how much the US has given away in terms of negotiating leverage without any concessions at all on the Russian side and without any progress at all .. "

1740192841091.png



Deep Intel on the U.S. Plan to End the War in Ukraine
Ward Carroll
640K subscribers

Feb 21, 2025
Two-time Moochie Award-winning Professor Justin Bronk returns to the channel to give his analysis of the recent meetings and public statements by President Donald J Trump and others in his administration as they start to take deliberate steps behind his campaign promise to quickly end the war in Ukraine.

 
I posted something that I thought was a neutral report on how each side views the situation, without taking any stand on it myself. My getting sucked into the debate will be short lived. Possible answers to the questions:
(1) The answer you want, that these states are afraid that if Russia wins anything in Ukraine, they will be next.
(2) They're falling for the fear-mongering western propaganda that the western governments and press are promoting.
(3) The western governments have strong-armed them into joining NATO to reinforce the propaganda.

I don't believe any of the crap I'm hearing in the media or in the Internet. All I know is my own conclusion that the USA wouldn't allow Canada or Mexico to join the Warsaw pact, and the Cuban missile crisis is a historical example to support that claim.


1) Putin has clearly stated, he wants to rebuild the Russian / Soviet Union / Tsarist Empire. - QED

2) if you have paid any attention, I really do not like MSM .. and look for more balanced analysis.

Those believing that Russia is a kind and considerate nation, and that they WILL keep their promises are not paying attention to the recent history of Putin's Russia.
( they've broken numerous peace treaties already .. )

3) NATO .. "The western governments have strong-armed them into joining NATO to reinforce the propaganda." - you've not paid attention, just like Americans voted for Trump ( guess they were fooled into this ? ), people of Europe voted that their nations joined NATO in the most recent cases. ..

SO if those voted to become a part of NATO is not valid, then how can Trump be a valid President of the USA ???


Regarding Canada / Mexico :

Around 3.5 to 5 million in Ukrainians were killed by Stalin .. USA has never killed so many in Mexico nor Canada

Attempting to argue Moral Equivalency ?

Well, Just like there is no Moral equivalency between Hamas and Israel .. nor Iran and Israel .. there is no moral equivalency between Russia and the USA, Putin and Trump ..
 
This ..

European NATO allies of the USA : " .. what we have actually been doing the last 25 years is fighting America's Wars as good allies and partners .. " After the USA invoked Article 5 on 9/11


1740194439904.png
 
Attempting to argue Moral Equivalency ?
The ONLY thing I argue is that the USA wouldn't allow Russian armaments near our border, and expecting Russia to allow NATO armaments near their border is unrealistic and hypocrisy. If that constitutes moral equivalency, I'm guilty. If not, you're trying to put words in my mouth.
 
If you look you can find the Russians killing Ukrainians on youtube ..
Yeah-- I needed to think about that for a while. The context of it is what got me-- I was watching coyotes and feral hogs get shot, then suddenly it was people being shot in much the same fashion on video. Now, a day later, I guess it is no different than the many videos of Apache gunships or A-10s shooting down Taliban.
 
Poland I expect will be considering their own nuclear arms right now .. there is no way they want to be Russified again

Not sure how they'd achieve that unless through some staging deal with the US, but then again Russia has said it won't allow nukes on it's borders. Poland has no way to build them itself - it has no nuclear reactors only a single research reactor and even then it takes considerable expertise to build a bomb with proliferation of the tech prohibited.

Trumps "deal" is a disaster for the free world. Allowing Russia to keep any gains can only encourage Russia to further seize land in the future, whether in Ukraine or elsewhere. Lets not forget Russia has already annexed part of Moldova as Transnistria. Potential for expansion there without invading another country externally. Just fly military in to your own airport and expand out. History shows appeasment ends in further war and no one will respect the US for plundering Ukraine.

Whilst Trump had a good start to his presidency, his true colours have shown through. With Israel as well as Ukraine, he shows just a greed for wealth and is carrying out the very same behaviour as Putin in my opinion in seizing land. You can't critisise Putin then take the similar land grab actions yourself. I'm all for Israel keeping Gaza and trading more land on the West Bank instead as you can't have a split country. However, thats different to a foreign power sezing it to build condos for the rich.

Trump and the US has now lost all international credibility and the reputation of the US has worsened further in a world that already hates it due to past actions. I'm not sure those in the US are aware of how much the US has become hated over the past couple of decades. Growing up in the 80's, Britain worshipped America and kids wanted to be like US kids. Now the majority of the UK hates the US with a passion as imperialistic and for actions such as attacking other countries allegedly for oil and pulling out and leaving countries high and dry in wars such as Iraq, Afganhistan etc. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in Britain today who'd admit to liking the US, and I think most of the EU is the same. This is why it's becoming harder and harder for the US to govern as a world policeman because all respect has been lost in other countries due to wayward US actions. The current situation can only worsen it's reputation further. Until the US acts with integrity in it's role, it's mandate around the world will shrink as will it's credibility.
 
Not sure how they'd achieve that unless through some staging deal with the US, but then again Russia has said it won't allow nukes on it's borders. Poland has no way to build them itself - it has no nuclear reactors only a single research reactor and even then it takes considerable expertise to build a bomb with proliferation of the tech prohibited.

Trumps "deal" is a disaster for the free world. Allowing Russia to keep any gains can only encourage Russia to further seize land in the future, whether in Ukraine or elsewhere. Lets not forget Russia has already annexed part of Moldova as Transnistria. Potential for expansion there without invading another country externally. Just fly military in to your own airport and expand out. History shows appeasment ends in further war and no one will respect the US for plundering Ukraine.

Whilst Trump had a good start to his presidency, his true colours have shown through. With Israel as well as Ukraine, he shows just a greed for wealth and is carrying out the very same behaviour as Putin in my opinion in seizing land. You can't critisise Putin then take the similar land grab actions yourself. I'm all for Israel keeping Gaza and trading more land on the West Bank instead as you can't have a split country. However, thats different to a foreign power sezing it to build condos for the rich.

Trump and the US has now lost all international credibility and the reputation of the US has worsened further in a world that already hates it due to past actions. I'm not sure those in the US are aware of how much the US has become hated over the past couple of decades. Growing up in the 80's, Britain worshipped America and kids wanted to be like US kids. Now the majority of the UK hates the US with a passion as imperialistic and for actions such as attacking other countries allegedly for oil and pulling out and leaving countries high and dry in wars such as Iraq, Afganhistan etc. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in Britain today who'd admit to liking the US, and I think most of the EU is the same. This is why it's becoming harder and harder for the US to govern as a world policeman because all respect has been lost in other countries due to wayward US actions. The current situation can only worsen it's reputation further. Until the US acts with integrity in it's role, it's mandate around the world will shrink as will it's credibility.
My initial reaction to this is, I don't care or give two F's for what the world thinks about it. The US has bent over and taken it without lube for a long time, and things have to change. There is NOTHING to stop EUROPE from keeping that lovely little Ukraine war going if they want. The US won't stop them. That war IS in their backyard after all, and if they feel it's in their best interests, then THEY SHOULD FULLY FUND IT. Unfortunately, EU and NATO countries have been sucking on the US tit for a long damned time, and they want ME (or more likely, my great-great-grandkids) to pay for it instead. Questions...
  • If Europe funds it but fails to get Ukraine back the territory gained by Russia, how long will they keep paying?
  • How long will Ukrainians keep enduring war and seeing their population killed? How many Russian and North Koreans will die as "acceptable losses" for those two countries?
  • Do you think the US should just go balls deep and send in a half-million troops and push Russia back? I bet EU will send 10,000 or so troops to say they participated...
  • Should we threaten to invade and repel?
  • Do we treat Ukraine AS IF they are in NATO?
  • Are we all ready to start WWIII over that corrupt shithole Ukraine?
 
The ONLY thing I argue is that the USA wouldn't allow Russian armaments near our border, and expecting Russia to allow NATO armaments near their border is unrealistic and hypocrisy. If that constitutes moral equivalency, I'm guilty. If not, you're trying to put words in my mouth.

So, let's take your argument ..

China should not allow Russian armaments near their border ...
Poland should not allow Russian armaments near their border
Sweden should not allow Russian armaments near their border
N Korea should not allow S Korean armaments near there border

USA should not allow Russian armaments near their border .. yet it does .. Alaska, and soon USA 51st state Canada and 52nd state Greenland ..

Geography matters.

one simply can not use the moral equivalency argument here without taking out the rights of those living on the border of Russia.

Remember today's Russia is NOT the USSR, and we should stop treating it as having the same power as the USSR, it simply does not.

Cold War 1 is over, and it is time for us to fully appreciate it and understand we are now in Cold War 2.0 where Russia is a vassal of China, and an ally of Iran / North Korea.

Russia economy is the size of Texas .. yet Texas allows Mexican armaments on it's borders

Russia economy is currently is an horrific situation. Their house is about to crack.

Furthermore, NATO by definition is a defensive pact .. last time Article 5 was called upon was the attack on the USA on 9/11

NATO has no plans to attack Russia

SO the question remains, should the USA treat Russia as an equal and betray the NATO allies and the promises we made to Ukraine ( so that Ukraine would give up their nukes, recall they were the #3 nuclear power after USSR fell )
 
  • Like
Reactions: sdkid
My initial reaction to this is, I don't care or give two F's for what the world thinks about it. The US has bent over and taken it without lube for a long time, and things have to change. There is NOTHING to stop EUROPE from keeping that lovely little Ukraine war going if they want. The US won't stop them. That war IS in their backyard after all, and if they feel it's in their best interests, then THEY SHOULD FULLY FUND IT. Unfortunately, EU and NATO countries have been sucking on the US tit for a long damned time, and they want ME (or more likely, my great-great-grandkids) to pay for it instead. Questions...
  • If Europe funds it but fails to get Ukraine back the territory gained by Russia, how long will they keep paying?
  • How long will Ukrainians keep enduring war and seeing their population killed? How many Russian and North Koreans will die as "acceptable losses" for those two countries?
  • Do you think the US should just go balls deep and send in a half-million troops and push Russia back? I bet EU will send 10,000 or so troops to say they participated...
  • Should we threaten to invade and repel?
  • Do we treat Ukraine AS IF they are in NATO?
  • Are we all ready to start WWIII over that corrupt shithole Ukraine?

1) EU NATO nations came to help the USA in the USA's wars .. Iraq, Afghanistan .. et al.

2) USA UK and Russia made a deal with Ukraine to defend it's borders when they gave up their nuclear weapons.

SO yes, I do expect the USA to do something.

Lesson for the world is to arm with nuclear weapons otherwise. Is this what you want ??

3) WWIII has already started in my book. Just a question of how it plays out.

Russo - Ukraine war is a war of attrition, USA and it's allies can defeat Russia without sending troops.

USA failed to arm Ukraine enough early on, and that is why we are here.

USA under Biden and Obama was considered weak, China grabbed the South Seas, Russia grabbed parts of Ukraine and other countries, and started up a bigger War in Ukraine.

DO you want WWIII to get hotter ? It will if the NATO alliance is considered weak. It will if the USA rewards attacks.

4) Russia is NOT as strong as many imagine, it is NOT the USSR ( Ukraine was a big economic part of the USSR .. they built a ton of weapons for the USSR )

5) Ukrainian, unlike other American allies in the past, are willing to take back their country.

6) Russia has broken all of it's past "peace deals" with Ukraine, what makes you think they will not break the next one ?
 
SO the question remains, should the USA treat Russia as an equal and betray the NATO allies and the promises we made to Ukraine ( so that Ukraine would give up their nukes, recall they were the #3 nuclear power after USSR fell )
This DOES get exhausting. My answer is that as sure as death and taxes, you're never going to let an opinion different that yours go untrounced without a fight using your version of the facts.
 
Ukr
1) EU NATO nations came to help the USA in the USA's wars .. Iraq, Afghanistan .. et al.

2) USA UK and Russia made a deal with Ukraine to defend it's borders when they gave up their nuclear weapons.

SO yes, I do expect the USA to do something.

Lesson for the world is to arm with nuclear weapons otherwise. Is this what you want ??

3) WWIII has already started in my book. Just a question of how it plays out.

Russo - Ukraine war is a war of attrition, USA and it's allies can defeat Russia without sending troops.

USA failed to arm Ukraine enough early on, and that is why we are here.

USA under Biden and Obama was considered weak, China grabbed the South Seas, Russia grabbed parts of Ukraine and other countries, and started up a bigger War in Ukraine.

DO you want WWIII to get hotter ? It will if the NATO alliance is considered weak. It will if the USA rewards attacks.

4) Russia is NOT as strong as many imagine, it is NOT the USSR ( Ukraine was a big economic part of the USSR .. they built a ton of weapons for the USSR )

5) Ukrainian, unlike other American allies in the past, are willing to take back their country.

6) Russia has broken all of it's past "peace deals" with Ukraine, what makes you think they will not break the next one ?
Ukraine is not part of NATO, and should not BE part of NATO. The Non-Nuke agreement from 1994 is a compelling argument, but how exactly do you propose enforcing that security agreement now? I don't believe that Ukraine is capable of expelling Russian forces from the land they occupy-- regardless of how weak Russia is or how bad their economy is. Russia crossed a new line by bringing in North Korea-- what will be the next rogue state to join them? How many other countries will we be fighting by proxy? How long will it be before that crap spills out to another part of the world?

You're worried about expansion of conflict if we negotiate a less-than-ideal peace deal, emboldening Russia to repeat territorial expansion by force elsewhere. I am more worried about this expanding if we continue to use Ukraine soldiers like puppets for interests that don't even represent American interests-- but European ones. That Ukraine willingness to fight combined with Billions of US dollars, supplies, and Euro aid has not pushed Russia out so far, and won't do it tomorrow. I don't think it is possible to get that land back for Ukraine without a full scale bombardment and invasion by US/Euro forces.

A HOT war between US and Russia. Imagine that. I could see Putin using tactical low-yield nukes that would not necessarily drop in Ukraine. he already threatened as much last November. I think the US takes that possibility very seriously, or Trump would have told Putin "Get the Fuck out of Ukraine by April or we will remove you." Well-- I would say let EUROPE call that bluff and go in and push Russia out. Should be easy-- right? They are weak-- right?? What ELSE is stopping us, since we have repeatedly espoused a Peace through Strength posture?
 
Last edited:
Out of curiosity, I asked GROK (the AI of X) about the probability of Ukraine regaining Russian occupied territory... It actually produced in interesting perspective and analysis of the situation currently playing out...
Predicting the likelihood of Ukraine regaining Russian-occupied territory by the end of 2025 is complex and depends on military, political, and diplomatic developments, none of which can be forecasted with certainty. As of now, February 22, 2025, Russia controls roughly 18-20% of Ukraine’s territory, including Crimea (annexed in 2014) and parts of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson regions seized since the 2022 invasion. Let’s break this down based on current trends and expert perspectives.​
Militarily, the war has settled into a grinding stalemate. Russia has made slow but steady gains in 2024, capturing about 4,000-4,168 square kilometers, mostly in Donetsk, according to various analyses. However, these advances come at a steep cost—hundreds of thousands of casualties and dwindling equipment reserves—suggesting Russia’s capacity to hold or expand control isn’t limitless. Ukraine, meanwhile, has shown resilience, holding onto roughly 800-1,250 square kilometers in Russia’s Kursk region after a bold incursion in August 2024. Yet, Kyiv struggles with manpower shortages and relies heavily on Western aid, which may wane under shifting political priorities, especially with the U.S. administration change in 2025.​
Politically, the momentum leans toward negotiations rather than battlefield breakthroughs. Ukraine’s President Zelensky has hinted at flexibility, suggesting in early 2025 that occupied lands could be swapped for Ukrainian-held territory in Kursk or pursued diplomatically if NATO membership is secured. Russia’s leadership, including Putin, insists on retaining all claimed territories—Crimea plus the four partially occupied regions—as a non-negotiable condition. The incoming U.S. Trump administration has signaled a push for a quick deal, with comments from Trump and his team indicating Ukraine reclaiming all its land is “unlikely” and that Russia might keep much of what it holds. This suggests a ceasefire freezing current lines could be on the table, reducing the odds of territory being returned soon.​
Expert opinions vary. Some, like Sergey Radchenko from Johns Hopkins, see three scenarios: a Russian breakthrough (possible but costly), a static front (most likely given exhaustion on both sides), or a Ukrainian offensive retaking land (currently improbable due to resource constraints). Others, like those at the Institute for the Study of War, note Russia’s logistical strain and Ukraine’s growing domestic arms production, hinting at a longer-term chance for Kyiv if support holds. Polls from late 2024 show 64% of Ukrainians might accept current lines for NATO and EU integration, signaling public fatigue could pressure Zelensky to compromise.​
Given these factors, the likelihood of Ukraine fully recovering Russian-occupied territory by the end of 2025 seems low—perhaps 10-20%—if relying solely on military means, as both sides lack the strength for decisive gains. A negotiated return of some territory, tied to a ceasefire or land swap, might nudge this to 30-40%, but Russia’s entrenched position and Western hesitancy to escalate make a full restoration improbable in the near term. The war’s attritional nature and emerging peace talks point more toward a frozen conflict than a dramatic reversal of control. Still, unexpected shifts—like a collapse in Russian morale or a surge in Ukrainian aid—could alter this outlook, though they’re not the current trajectory.​
 
Last edited:
US Weapons very expensive compared to others, some weapons USA has dominance on. within NATO
lean inventory, just in time production does not work well for military ..

1740326025292.png


Corruption measure ..

1740325784793.png


China and Drones .. China dominates drone production, expect this to be a challenge in the future

1740326602142.png



Good Q&A views from Perun

 
Last edited:

Above is video from Kharkov which is the second largest city in ukraine with the majority being Russian speaking Ukrainians.

A Russian suicide quadcopter strapped with a RPG/Mortar, quietly hunting for military targets. While the civilians wave at it.


In another video a civilan signals to the operator to abort at the last second. Every house and its occupants are potential targets because its a battlefield. Mostly only Russian speaking people stay behind. But this is still literal hell for the people.

This is why this war needs to end.

Putin wants to end the war, Trump wants to end it. Vast majority of the Ukraine and Russian people wants this war to end.

The only ones who want the war to continue are left wing EU governments and dictator Zelensky and our MIC loving dirtbags in DC.

Vast majority of the right leaning parties in EU want to end the war.
 
Last edited:
@mat200 --

Great video. I think that analysis is likely spot on in terms of corruption in both countries. It feels a bit like two gangs fighting over turf, but on a national scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat200
Why Some Celebrities Support Russia (and Why It Matters)
Ryan McBeth