US Elections (& Politics) :)

LOL- that Ukraine fiasco is quickly imploding, and they need a scapegoat..


The 'Ukraine Failure' Script Is Already Being Written & Only One Man Will Be Blamed
The 'Ukraine Failure' Script Is Already Being Written & Only One Man Will Be Blamed | ZeroHedge

But also more importantly, just this week, Politico has chimed in with what's likely to take shape as the next MSM consensus: it will be Trump's fault if (or when) the Ukrainians lose. Looking ahead to a possible 2024 victory and return to the White House, Politico sets up Trump to take the fall in the following:

This sense that Ukrainians need to take the initiative at home both by scouring the global arms bazaar for hi-tech gizmos and by making more of their own heavy armor and shells is only amplified by the looming threat of a return to the White House by Donald Trump, who argues that America should not be "sending very much" to Ukraine and that Kyiv should sue for peace with the invader.
Other Republican candidates have only heightened Ukrainians’ fears that the next U.S. president could sell out their young democracy to the Kremlin.
Click to expand...
FOX too, commenting on the same report, says, "With the possibility of Trump, the current GOP presidential front-runner, returning to office after the 2024 election, Ukrainians are preparing for reduced weapons supplies from the U.S..." And currently, continues Fox, "More than 100 companies are among the Ukrainian arms producers actively working to acquire mostly Chinese-made drone parts from middlemen or third countries, as Beijing has said it halted all direct sales of the weapons to both Kyiv and Moscow’s forces."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gwminor48, SJGUSMC21 and Parley
  • Like
Reactions: SJGUSMC21, samplenhold and Parley
FWIW - many expecting a rather long Russo-Ukraine war ..
 
bigredfish said:
kinda like Vietnam and Afghanistan..
Click to expand...

in a way yes, both cases the Nuclear Power lost ..

yet different also as in both the USA had troops fighting ..

With all the static defense lines, also reminds me of WWI ..
 
  • Like
Reactions: SJGUSMC21, bigredfish and Parley
Do Australians understand how truly and completely fucked they are about to be? Better WAKE THE FUCK UP!

Australia's Misinfo Bill Paves Way For Soviet-Style Censorship
Australia's Misinfo Bill Paves Way For Soviet-Style Censorship | ZeroHedge

The Australian Government’s proposed new laws to crack down on misinformation and disinformation have drawn intense criticism for their potential to restrict free expression and political dissent, paving the way for a digital censorship regime reminiscent of Soviet Lysenkoism...



Under the draft legislation, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) will gain considerable expanded regulatory powers to “combat misinformation and disinformation,” which ACMA says poses a “threat to the safety and wellbeing of Australians, as well as to our democracy, society and economy.”

Digital platforms will be required to share information with ACMA on demand, and to implement stronger systems and processes for handling of misinformation and disinformation.

ACMA will be empowered to devise and enforce digital codes with a “graduated set of tools” including infringement notices, remedial directions, injunctions and civil penalties, with fines of up to $550,000 (individuals) and $2.75 million (corporations). Criminal penalties, including imprisonment, may apply in extreme cases.

Controversially, the government will be exempt from the proposed laws, as will professional news outlets, meaning that ACMA will not compel platforms to police misinformation and disinformation disseminated by official government or news sources.

As the government and professional news outlets have been, and continue to be, a primary source of online misinformation and disinformation, it is unclear that the proposed laws will meaningfully reduce online misinformation and disinformation. Rather, the legislation will enable the proliferation of official narratives, whether true, false or misleading, while quashing the opportunity for dissenting narratives to compete.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: Oceanslider, mat200, gwminor48 and 5 others
Bye Bye Donald

WASHINGTON (AP) — A witness in the criminal case against Donald Trump over the hoarding of classified documents retracted “prior false testimony” after switching lawyers last month and provided new information that implicated the former president, the Justice Department said Tuesday.
The statements from the witness, a Trump staffer identified in court papers as the director of information technology at Mar-a-Lago, was presented to prosecutors weeks before special counsel Jack Smith secured an updated indictment accusing Trump and two others in a plot to delete surveillance video at the Florida property.
 
ctgoldwing said:
Bye Bye Donald

WASHINGTON (AP) — A witness in the criminal case against Donald Trump over the hoarding of classified documents retracted “prior false testimony” after switching lawyers last month and provided new information that implicated the former president, the Justice Department said Tuesday.
The statements from the witness, a Trump staffer identified in court papers as the director of information technology at Mar-a-Lago, was presented to prosecutors weeks before special counsel Jack Smith secured an updated indictment accusing Trump and two others in a plot to delete surveillance video at the Florida property.
Click to expand...

Hey ctgoldwing, tell me what the written procedure is for a sitting President to declassify documents?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: SJGUSMC21, David L, Parley and 4 others
Parley said:
Then you tell me what the answer is to that question.?
Click to expand...
1692833608507.png

Posted this again since it was not obvious the first time.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: gwminor48, bigredfish, tigerwillow1 and 3 others
Presidential Hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy Let's Talk About The 2nd Amendment
 
  • Like
Reactions: gwminor48
rezzor said:
I’ll give you a hint since apparently you don’t know. The President can’t declassify documents by “thinking about it.” like our orange president thought.

As the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit noted, no proof was presented that the documents were declassified. It’s funny how you guys refuse to accept reality.

here is a picture of reality
285d3a23-02d5-4bb6-9959-4784eaef089c.jpg
Click to expand...
Since you are so well versed on classified documents, what should happen to Biden, Pence, Hillary and others found to have had classified documents in their possession? What about having classified documents on non-government devices or email servers? Shouldn't they also be indicted? Anxiously awaiting your excuses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom