Oceanslider
Known around here
Putting this here because the biden and democrats love this and are all for it...
US Elections (& Politics) :)
- Thread starter sdkid
- Start date
YouTube user Da Real Adogg with two good video excerpts, and his own excellent commentary.
The Uniparty Game
The Uniparty and its constituencies in Politics, Big Business, Academia, and the Washington Blob have spent recent decades advancing a foolhardy agenda of globalization with unanimous support in our nation’s capital.
We’ve compiled 12 quotes reflecting the dogmatic tenets of this consensus; can you tell where on the political spectrum they originate?
The Uniparty and its constituencies in Politics, Big Business, Academia, and the Washington Blob have spent recent decades advancing a foolhardy agenda of globalization with unanimous support in our nation’s capital.
We’ve compiled 12 quotes reflecting the dogmatic tenets of this consensus; can you tell where on the political spectrum they originate?
bigredfish
Known around here
Preview of things to come in liberal Democrat cities across the country.
We really need to fence off Cali and turn it into a penal colony.
Watch: Massive Teen Hordes Swarm Two California Malls - Beatings, Gunfire, Stabbing Ensue
www.zerohedge.com
We really need to fence off Cali and turn it into a penal colony.
Watch: Massive Teen Hordes Swarm Two California Malls - Beatings, Gunfire, Stabbing Ensue
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
bigredfish
Known around here
Of course we'll get Parley, Oceanslider and others out first!
bigredfish
Known around here
Over 1,600 Scientists Sign 'No Climate Emergency' Declaration
Over 1,600 Scientists Sign 'No Climate Emergency' Declaration | ZeroHedge
International scientists have jointly signed a declaration dismissing the existence of a climate crisis and insisting that carbon dioxide is beneficial to Earth, contrary to the popular alarmist narrative.
“There is no climate emergency,” the Global Climate Intelligence Group (CLINTEL) said in its World Climate Declaration (pdf), made public in August. “Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.”
A total of 1,609 scientists and professionals from around the world have signed the declaration, including 321 from the United States.
The coalition pointed out that Earth’s climate has varied as long as it has existed, with the planet experiencing several cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age only ended as recently as 1850, they said.
"Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming," the declaration said.
Warming is happening “far slower” than predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
“Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools,” the coalition said, adding that these models "exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases" and "ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.” For instance, even though climate alarmists characterize CO2 as environmentally-damaging, the coalition pointed out that the gas is “not a pollutant.”
Carbon dioxide is “essential” to all life on earth and is “favorable” for nature. Extra CO2 results in the growth of global plant biomass while also boosting the yields of crops worldwide.
CLINTEL also dismissed the narrative of global warming being linked to increased natural disasters like hurricanes, floods, and droughts, stressing that there is “no statistical evidence” to support these claims.
“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works whatever the causes are,” it said.
“To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. Should not we free ourselves from the naive belief in immature climate models?”
....“Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills.”
“It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists. In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis.”
Over 1,600 Scientists Sign 'No Climate Emergency' Declaration | ZeroHedge
International scientists have jointly signed a declaration dismissing the existence of a climate crisis and insisting that carbon dioxide is beneficial to Earth, contrary to the popular alarmist narrative.
“There is no climate emergency,” the Global Climate Intelligence Group (CLINTEL) said in its World Climate Declaration (pdf), made public in August. “Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.”
A total of 1,609 scientists and professionals from around the world have signed the declaration, including 321 from the United States.
The coalition pointed out that Earth’s climate has varied as long as it has existed, with the planet experiencing several cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age only ended as recently as 1850, they said.
"Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming," the declaration said.
Warming is happening “far slower” than predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
“Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools,” the coalition said, adding that these models "exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases" and "ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.” For instance, even though climate alarmists characterize CO2 as environmentally-damaging, the coalition pointed out that the gas is “not a pollutant.”
Carbon dioxide is “essential” to all life on earth and is “favorable” for nature. Extra CO2 results in the growth of global plant biomass while also boosting the yields of crops worldwide.
CLINTEL also dismissed the narrative of global warming being linked to increased natural disasters like hurricanes, floods, and droughts, stressing that there is “no statistical evidence” to support these claims.
“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works whatever the causes are,” it said.
“To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. Should not we free ourselves from the naive belief in immature climate models?”
....“Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills.”
“It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists. In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis.”
Parley
Known around here
Let's just say I am ready for self-defense.
Do you look "Trumpish"? If it's looks I don't have enough hair if they mean actually looking like Trump. I didn't know Trump supporters had a "look".
www.thegatewaypundit.com
BREAKING: O'Keefe Media Group: Police Bodycam Footage Shows NJ School Board Officals Calling Police on Citizens Who Look "Trumpish" (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
O’Keefe Media Group on Wednesday released 20 minutes of police bodycam footage showing New Jersey school board officials calling the police on citizens they don’t recognize who look “Trumpish.” “The police colluded with school officials to scan license plates of school board meeting attendees...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
DC Draino is a Never Ramaswamer. Even after presented with evidence to the contrary he continues to attack Vivek. He has been corrected by many big names like Dr Jordan Peterson on Vivek but he continues to post the same. He has accepted that he hates Vivek.
To the point, Vivek has only voted twice once in 2004 to some libertarian then again in 2020 to Trump.
Trump himself was a registered Democrat.
As far as Soros link its not George soros but Paul Soros, he got a generic scholarship like hundred other students.
Trump himself got investment from soros.
Big names back Trump tower
Donald Trump has lined up three New York hedge funds, including money from billionaire George Soros, to invest $160 million in his Chicago skyscraper, a key piece in perhaps the largest constructio…
www.chicagotribune.com
So we have to see everything objectively.
Last edited:
Oceanslider
Known around here
Good video compilation (video is time stamped)
bigredfish
Known around here
Crazy talk? No, think about it. Logical conclusions...
Tucker Warns Of Trump Assassination, Hot War With Russia
Tucker Warns Of Trump Assassination, Hot War With Russia | ZeroHedge
......Carlson also opined on former president Barack Obama, who the former Fox News host says was smoking crack and having sex with men, but the media was too afraid to report it ahead of the 2008 presidential election.
Carlson was referring to repeated claims by a man named Larry Sinclair, who maintains that Obama bought and smoked cocaine before they had sex in 1999.
"A guy came forward, Larry Sinclair, and said "I'll sign an affidavit" and he did, "I'll do a lie detector" and he did," said Carlson. "'I smoked crack with Barack Obama and had sex with him", that was obviously true."
According to Tucker, nobody dared repeat the accusation due to threats from the Obama campaign.
"'Nobody reported it not because they were squeamish about sex or drugs but because the Obama campaign said anyone who reports on this gets no access to the Obama campaign," he said. "So, they didn't report on it."
"It’s not going to change the world that Barack Obama likes dudes, I think this was well-known," Carlson continued, adding that Obama himself acknowledged his gay impulses in a letter to a former girlfriend.
Tucker Warns Of Trump Assassination, Hot War With Russia
Tucker Warns Of Trump Assassination, Hot War With Russia | ZeroHedge
......Carlson also opined on former president Barack Obama, who the former Fox News host says was smoking crack and having sex with men, but the media was too afraid to report it ahead of the 2008 presidential election.
Carlson was referring to repeated claims by a man named Larry Sinclair, who maintains that Obama bought and smoked cocaine before they had sex in 1999.
"A guy came forward, Larry Sinclair, and said "I'll sign an affidavit" and he did, "I'll do a lie detector" and he did," said Carlson. "'I smoked crack with Barack Obama and had sex with him", that was obviously true."
According to Tucker, nobody dared repeat the accusation due to threats from the Obama campaign.
"'Nobody reported it not because they were squeamish about sex or drugs but because the Obama campaign said anyone who reports on this gets no access to the Obama campaign," he said. "So, they didn't report on it."
"It’s not going to change the world that Barack Obama likes dudes, I think this was well-known," Carlson continued, adding that Obama himself acknowledged his gay impulses in a letter to a former girlfriend.
Do tell . . .
justthenews.com
And another thing:
Michigan police memos raised concern about possible nationwide voter registration fraud scheme
Local Michigan police and the state's attorney general discovered a high ratio of fraudulent voter registration applications, investigated "Election Fraud by Forgery," and referred the matter to the FBI.
justthenews.com
And another thing:
Oceanslider
Known around here
Do tell . . .
Michigan police memos raised concern about possible nationwide voter registration fraud scheme
Local Michigan police and the state's attorney general discovered a high ratio of fraudulent voter registration applications, investigated "Election Fraud by Forgery," and referred the matter to the FBI.
And another thing:
Michigan Voter Fraud Scandal: TGP Has Evidence - Several County Clerks Reveal They Also Received Suspicious Voter Registration Packages in the Mail | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
According to far-left Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, there was no serious voter fraud in the 2020 election.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Oceanslider
Known around here
They claim lightning, but doesn't lightning need clouds? Lit by satellite maybe?
Parley
Known around here
Report: Raffensperger Testimony Supports Trump Defense in Georgia Case
Testimony this week in federal court by Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger reportedly contradicted claims that former President Donald Trump insisted he violate his oath of office by fabricating enough votes to win the state.
As Breitbart News has long noted, the media have misrepresented the January 2021 phone call between Trump and Raffensperger, quoting Trump as telling Raffensperger that he should “find” the votes necessary for him to win. In fact, Trump said “I just want to find” the votes, referring to his own state of mind. Moreover, the context was that Trump believed he actually had won the state of Georgia, and the votes simply had not been properly counted yet.
Raffensperger took the stand in a federal court in the Northern District of Georgia as part of a hearing on a motion by former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, who is one of Trump’s 18 co-defendants in the criminal case in Fulton County, Georgia. Meadows argued that the case should be removed to federal court, because he was just working for the president, and therefore cannot be tried in state court under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.
Meadows stunned many observers by testifying in his own defense. Raffensperger was subpoenaed to testify by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. According to George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley, Raffensperger testified that the call, while “extraordinary,” was a “settlement negotiation” in the context of an argument over whether to pursue another recount of votes — not a demand to make up new votes.
Turley wrote:
The call was misrepresented by the [Washington] Post and the transcript later showed that Trump was not simply demanding that votes be added to the count but rather asking for another recount or continued investigation...
Report: Raffensperger Testimony Supports Trump Defense in Georgia Case (breitbart.com)
My comment: Imagine that. The Washington Post misrepresented the phone call.
Testimony this week in federal court by Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger reportedly contradicted claims that former President Donald Trump insisted he violate his oath of office by fabricating enough votes to win the state.
As Breitbart News has long noted, the media have misrepresented the January 2021 phone call between Trump and Raffensperger, quoting Trump as telling Raffensperger that he should “find” the votes necessary for him to win. In fact, Trump said “I just want to find” the votes, referring to his own state of mind. Moreover, the context was that Trump believed he actually had won the state of Georgia, and the votes simply had not been properly counted yet.
Raffensperger took the stand in a federal court in the Northern District of Georgia as part of a hearing on a motion by former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, who is one of Trump’s 18 co-defendants in the criminal case in Fulton County, Georgia. Meadows argued that the case should be removed to federal court, because he was just working for the president, and therefore cannot be tried in state court under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.
Meadows stunned many observers by testifying in his own defense. Raffensperger was subpoenaed to testify by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. According to George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley, Raffensperger testified that the call, while “extraordinary,” was a “settlement negotiation” in the context of an argument over whether to pursue another recount of votes — not a demand to make up new votes.
Turley wrote:
The call was misrepresented by the [Washington] Post and the transcript later showed that Trump was not simply demanding that votes be added to the count but rather asking for another recount or continued investigation...
Report: Raffensperger Testimony Supports Trump Defense in Georgia Case (breitbart.com)
My comment: Imagine that. The Washington Post misrepresented the phone call.
DC Draino is a Never Ramaswamer. Even after presented with evidence to the contrary he continues to attack Vivek. He has been corrected by many big names like Dr Jordan Peterson on Vivek but he continues to post the same. He has accepted that he hates Vivek.
To the point, Vivek has only voted twice once in 2004 to some libertarian then again in 2020 to Trump.
Trump himself was a registered Democrat.
As far as Soros link its not George soros but Paul Soros, he got a generic scholarship like hundred other students.
Trump himself got investment from soros.
Big names back Trump tower
Donald Trump has lined up three New York hedge funds, including money from billionaire George Soros, to invest $160 million in his Chicago skyscraper, a key piece in perhaps the largest constructio…
So we have to see everything objectively.
I wouldn't hold this against him. We all do things in our youth, that we feel is right. He did the same. Hell, President Regan was a demoncrat at one point.
Doesn't mean I like him, but to me this is a non issue. Although the 'Soros' moniker should make any Conservatives eyes twitch a bit...
Do you look "Trumpish"? If it's looks I don't have enough hair if they mean actually looking like Trump. I didn't know Trump supporters had a "look".
BREAKING: O'Keefe Media Group: Police Bodycam Footage Shows NJ School Board Officals Calling Police on Citizens Who Look "Trumpish" (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
O’Keefe Media Group on Wednesday released 20 minutes of police bodycam footage showing New Jersey school board officials calling the police on citizens they don’t recognize who look “Trumpish.” “The police colluded with school officials to scan license plates of school board meeting attendees...
Hey, there's a tee shirt!
Trumpish Tee
Feeling Trumpish? Grab this awesome tee! It's only available for a week, so order yours before it's gone! Premium quality shirt Super soft ringspun cotton fabric Cut, sewn, and printed right here in America Fits true to size and won't shrink in the wash.
okeefestore.com
