US Elections (& Politics) :)

Houston we have a BIG problem


May want to read through this thread. Lots of weird shit going down in Texas. This is just a piece of it

 
  • Angry
  • Wow
Reactions: David L, gwminor48, Parley and 4 others
sdkid said:
If you're into betting, here is the latest prediction...

View attachment 206381

polymarket.com

Polymarket - 2024 Presidential Election Predictions

2024 Presidential Election Predictions. Trust markets, not presidential polls. Live and accurate forecasts by the world's largest prediction market.
polymarket.com polymarket.com

EDIT: Some of these betting markets are really interesting...

View attachment 206382

polymarket.com

Polymarket | The World's Largest Prediction Market

Put your money where your mouth is on politics, sports, crypto, culture & more.
polymarket.com polymarket.com
Click to expand...
Sadly, there's been word of HUGE PolyMarket betting going on from both sides, most of it from non-individual interests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbuster, bigredfish and sdkid
All because a friggin comedian got up and told a stupid joke and people have thin skins. That will probably be the push for PA to stay blue.



Then WI numbers showing blue advancing. How can there be so many morons in this nation?? Same people that complain about groceries are gonna be voting that communistic slut in…in top of all the cheating that is being pointed out here. God help us all; so disgusted at this point.

Wisconsin Presidential Election, November 2024 – Trafalgar Group

www.thetrafalgargroup.org www.thetrafalgargroup.org
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: mbuster, johnfitz and bigredfish
Georgia, Nevada, PA, Michigan, so many scams going, (and dont forget about the machines) I dont see how Trump is allowed to win without a 100M+ landslide
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: gwminor48, mbuster, sdkid and 5 others
  • Angry
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: gwminor48, mbuster, Arjun and 4 others
TonyR said:
FCC commissioner claims Harris on ‘SNL’ violates ‘equal time’ rule
Click to expand...

The article states...
The purpose of the rule is to avoid exactly this type of biased and partisan conduct — a licensed broadcaster using the public airwaves to exert its influence for one candidate on the eve of an election. Unless the broadcaster offered Equal Time to other qualifying campaigns,” Carr, a Trump appointee, continued.

Immediately followed by...
The FCC’s “equal time” rules let rival candidates ask for equal airtime.

I wonder which is correct, or am I reading this wrong and the two statements don't conflict?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gwminor48, Parley and bigredfish
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom