
Except for maybe the 1 in 1 trillion odds against Spencer Pratt not receiving a single, solitary vote in 22K to 24K mail in ballots over the weekend?There is no evidence of wide scale fraudulent voting so far...
Except for maybe the 1 in 1 trillion odds against Spencer Pratt not receiving a single, solitary vote in 22K to 24K mail in ballots over the weekend?
If we had Voter I.D. it would be much easier to find the fraud. But not receiving a single solitary vote in that 24k mailed in ballots is insane. And considering the odds if you had to bet, you'd bet on fraud. So anyone disputing fraud is just putting blinders on.Except for maybe the 1 in 1 trillion odds against Spencer Pratt not receiving a single, solitary vote in 22K to 24K mail in ballots over the weekend?
You laugh Johnfitz, but Democrats let DC turn into a hell hole starting with Obama. During Trumps first term they bogged him down with fraudulent accusations, that he could not do more than he did, and what he did during his first term was actually an exceptional amount and remarkable in its own right, add what he was going through with the fake witch hunts and it make it 1000 time more remarkable.
Just look at the border crossings, do you see the difference between what Trump can do and what Kamela and Joe did?
Attention Boomer Trump cult supporters
He’s laughing at you …![]()
Except for maybe the 1 in 1 trillion odds against Spencer Pratt not receiving a single, solitary vote in 22K to 24K mail in ballots over the weekend?
If we had Voter I.D. it would be much easier to find the fraud. But not receiving a single solitary vote in that 24k mailed in ballots is insane. And considering the odds if you had to bet, you'd bet on fraud. So anyone disputing fraud is just putting blinders on.