US Elections (& Politics) :)

  • Sad
Reactions: Ssayer, sebastiantombs and David L
bigredfish said:
Adam Schiff Now Admits to Mueller's Obvious Dementia, Says It Was "Heartbreaking" to Witness Robert Mueller's Mental State During 2019 Testimony

Why do liberal "progressive" Democrats keep putting their trust in dementia patients?

mueller-testimony-lost-dementia.jpg


mueller-2-600x397.jpg


On May 17, 2017 Deputy and Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein signed the document to appoint former FBI Chief Robert Mueller as Special Counsel to investigate President Trump on collusion with Russia during the 2016 campaign.

Rosenstein knew at the time there was no collusion but ordered the Special Counsel anyway in one of their many attempts to take down President Trump

Rosenstein then approved the appointment of controversial far-left Democrat Andrew Weissmann to assist in running the Special Counsel. Rosenstein knew Weissmann would run the operation because he knew Robert Mueller was suffering from severe dementia and was incapable of finding the coffee room down the hallway.

This was one of the many lies by the Department of Justice and FBI in the last 6 years proving a corrupt, two-tiered legal system in the country today.

Weissmann then hired all far-left Hillary supporting attorneys and went to work. Weissmann indicted and jailed Trump associates on process crimes. He refused to investigate the criminal actions of the Obama administration’s spying on candidate Trump. Weissmann indicted Russian operatives and companies to appear legitimate. Weissmann harassed Trump officials for two years in the hope that someone would fabricate a story so he could indict Trump.


And the rest is history

And in July 2019 the country found out Rod Rosenstein and Andrew Weissmann used Robert Mueller in their plot to remove President Trump.
It was very clear from Mueller’s testimony that he is suffering from severe dementia.

Rosenstein and Weissman knew this.

That’s why Mueller NEVER attended the meetings with Trump lawyers.

Rosenstein and Andrew Weissmann knew Robert Mueller was suffering from severe dementia. They used him anyway to convince the American public that their nefarious plot to remove the president was legitimate. They are liars and crooks.

And now in his new book even pencil-neck Adam Schiff admitted that Mueller was completely witless during the special counsel.

Lifezette reported:
Click to expand...
The sad part of this is, that under half of the United States, those that actually voted for Biden, still believe Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election. I have a 46yo niece who is a brainwashed, all day on tiktok, leftist who will not say Trump did not collude with Russia. She thinks he did but got away with it. She thinks Schiff is a great American patriot for what he did during the Trump presidency.

And a leftist acquaintance, 50yo, who I asked less than three weeks ago if he felt Trump colluded and his response was to mention the Don Jr., Trump tower incident. Which was a setup, as Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer involved in the meeting, met twice with Glenn Simpson (of Fusion GPS hired by Hillary, and who worked with Steele) on the day of the set up. The night before the Trump Tower meeting, Simpson had dinner with Natalia Veselnitskaya. He had dinner with her again the night after the meeting, he told Congress (in a closed door testimony, out of public sight). Of course weissmann never pursued that lead. And there was no mention of it in the fake report weissmann wrote up for public consumption. This leftist acquaintance of mine, he knew nothing about Glenn Simpson or even what Fusion GPS was.

Oh yeah, either did the great mueller


Also, let not forget Natalia’s and Simpson’s, their stories didn’t match up. In her written testimony, since she was back in Russia, she said she never met with Simpson. She thought he would lie and say no also. But Simpson was worried about perjury, and possible cameras that caught them together (my assumption).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Angry
Reactions: Ssayer, sebastiantombs, TonyR and 2 others
Ssayer said:
Bwahahahahaha!!!


ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com
Click to expand...
Regarding PETA wanting to end the term "Bullpen" in ML baseball because it's insensitive to cows...what's next? What about:
  • Cockpit (HINT: has nothing to do with roosters or slang for male genitalia, but we don't want to offend the ignorant)
  • White collar
  • Blackout
  • Bush pilot
  • Spade (in card games or tools)
  • Anyone named "Mike Hunt", "Phil McCracken", "Ben Dover", "Heywood Jablowme" or ???
  • EDIT: added "Lesgo Brandon" and "Lescoe Brandon" to the above list of names
  • The White Cliffs of Dover
  • The Black Hills of Dakota
  • Beaver Dam, WI
  • The Red Sea
  • The Yellow River
  • Straight Talk wireless
  • The Gay 90s
  • Yada yada, blah blah, ad nauseam
Or any other name, word or phrase, numbering in the thousands, that means nothing but just that to any half-way intelligent person but is offensive to thin-skinned, butt-hurt, woke, culture-cancelling numbnut leftist commie-dems.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mat200, bigredfish, gwminor48 and 4 others
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: TVille, bigredfish, sdkid and 6 others
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: bigredfish, gwminor48, Oceanslider and 3 others
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish, Oceanslider, Ssayer and 2 others
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish, sdkid, gwminor48 and 5 others
Arjun said:
Click to expand...

My Dad retired a Truck Driver. At one time he had his own Rig. They were just introducing GPS tracking in the trucks where he worked when he retired. It is hard work, in my opinion. He did long haul and did work awhile in short haul towards the end of his carrier. Crazy but he was a Programmer before he got into trucking. He hated office work, I am the same there too. Hit the open road, when he retired he was able to go visit/vacation many of the places where he traveled/delivered to...
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: TVille, bigredfish, kozmo2k and 4 others
TonyR said:
Regarding PETA wanting to end the term "Bullpen" in ML baseball because it's insensitive to cows...what's next? What about:
  • Cockpit (HINT: has nothing to do with roosters or slang for male genitalia, but we don't want to offend the ignorant)
  • White collar
  • Blackout
  • Bush pilot
  • Spade (in card games or tools)
  • Anyone named "Mike Hunt", "Phil McCracken", "Ben Dover", "Heywood Jablowme" or ???
  • EDIT: added "Lesgo Brandon" and "Lescoe Brandon" to the above list of names
  • The White Cliffs of Dover
  • The Black Hills of Dakota
  • Beaver Dam, WI
  • The Red Sea
  • The Yellow River
  • Straight Talk wireless
  • The Gay 90s
  • Yada yada, blah blah, ad nauseam
Or any other name, word or phrase, numbering in the thousands, that means nothing but just that to any half-way intelligent person but is offensive to thin-skinned, butt-hurt, woke, culture-cancelling numbnut leftist commie-dems.
Click to expand...

Regarding the appendix in the novel, "1984" (ref:You probably didn’t read the most telling part of Orwell’s “1984”—the appendix):

After “THE END,” Orwell includes another chapter, an appendix, called “The Principles of Newspeak.” Since it has the trappings of a tedious scholarly treatise, readers often skip the appendix. But it changes our whole understanding of the novel. Written from some unspecified point in the future, it suggests that Big Brother was eventually defeated. The victory is attributed not to individual rebels or to The Brotherhood, an anonymous resistance group, but rather to language itself. The appendix details Oceania’s attempt to replace Oldspeak, or English, with Newspeak, a linguistic shorthand that reduces the world of ideas to a set of simple, stark words. “The whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought.” It will render dissent “literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.”

But it never comes to pass. The Party’s plans—the abolition of the family, laughter, art, literature, curiosity, pleasure, in favor of a “boot stamping down on a human face forever”—are never achieved because Newspeak fails to take. Why? Because it was too difficult to translate Oldspeak literature into Newspeak. The text Orwell singles out to exemplify this, intriguingly, is the Declaration of Independence. The “author” of the appendix argues that these ideas cannot be expressed in Newspeak, specifically the part about governments deriving their legitimacy from the consent of the people, and citizens having the right to challenge any government that fails to honor the contract. As long as we have a nuanced, expansive system of language, Orwell claims, we will have freedom and the possibility of dissent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish, David L, gwminor48 and 1 other person
Proof once again, that the liberal retard left will say ANYTHING to attempt to get elected! This guy is a cancer to our country!

1635777627867.png
 
  • Angry
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: bigredfish, David L, sebastiantombs and 1 other person
So the libs are freaking out about a Southwest Airline Pilot who allegedly made an announcement -> "Lets Go Brandon".

A single AP reporter who was on the flight made the claim. Here is the actual announcement, disregard all the text - what do you think the last word is? Brandon or maybe something else?

 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish, David L and sebastiantombs
Kind of apropos that this was in my mail right after reading eeeeesh post above -

Statement on TMTG
by the 45th President Donald J. Trump

October 26, 2021

Last week, I announced the creation of a major new company that will challenge the dominance of the Big Tech giants and Big Media bosses. Today I want to explain more about what I am doing and why. For me, this endeavor is about much more than politics. This is about saving our country.

America has always been a nation of smart, spirited, and independent people who take pride in thinking for themselves. We admire those who aren’t afraid to speak their minds, or go against the tide. Yet suddenly, we find ourselves being censored and dictated to by a small group of self-righteous scolds and self-appointed arbiters of what everyone else is allowed to think, say, share, and do.

Nowhere is this censorship more dangerous and brazen than on social media, the public square of our times. We have seen renowned medical doctors being banned from platforms for contradicting “health authorities” or questioning the political narrative of the moment. We’ve seen scientists blacklisted for sharing evidence that the pandemic began in a Chinese lab. We’ve seen vital reporting about Joe and Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings—information that voters needed and deserved to hear—ruthlessly suppressed and erased from the internet just weeks before a presidential election. And as everyone knows, we’ve seen a sitting president of the United States effectively silenced by a small oligarchy of tech titans and “mainstream” media corporations.

The corruption of these platforms cannot be ignored. We have fallen far down the “slippery slope” of censorship in our country, and the topics that Americans are increasingly forbidden to debate are among the most important issues of our day.

This wildly aggressive censorship and “cancel-culture” is not only un-American—it has direct, real-world consequences. Most obvious are the many catastrophes unfolding under the current administration: the calamitous Afghanistan withdrawal, the disaster at the Southern Border, runaway inflation, and the multi-trillion-dollar socialist spending nightmare, just to name a few. In a country that had free speech and a free flow of information, none of this would ever have happened—and no one understands that better than the people doing the censoring.

Yet the silencing and cancellation also affects our country in more subtle, but equally destructive, ways. How many Americans no longer trust a word they hear from their leaders, media, or public health officials, because the one thing they know for certain is that they are not getting the full story? How many ordinary citizens have sadly come to resent their neighbors, feeling that they now live in two entirely different realities? And how many millions of Americans silently oppose so much of the nonsense being inflicted on us, but see the heavy hand of the cancelers, and conclude that their voice can make no difference, or that the cost of speaking up is just too high?

The new age of censorship is a disaster for our country. Things were far better in the days when we had our debates fiercely and openly, and then we could move forward together, as Americans, with both sides knowing that their voice, and their best arguments, had been heard.

The more I looked into this problem, the more I realized that to restore free speech, a major new platform would have to enter the market, with an ironclad commitment to protecting vigorous debate from all sides. But since it is both hard and expensive to build a new platform totally independent of Big Tech’s infrastructure, it would have to be an extremely well-funded, multi-year undertaking. In addition, such a platform would need the ability to rapidly attract millions of users, welcoming not only Republicans to join, but Independents and Democrats as well.

It’s a tremendously difficult set of challenges—and I realized I might be the only person in America with the megaphone, the resources, the experience, and the desire to make it all happen. So with the same “can-do” spirit that has always allowed Americans to persevere, that is exactly what I am doing.

To take on Big Tech censorship, we are creating a “Big Tent” platform: Truth Social. We are inviting people of all political stripes, and all different viewpoints, to come and participate once again in the great American debate. That’s what our country is supposed to be about. Unlike with the Big Tech platforms, there will be no shadow-banning, throttling, demonetizing, or messing with algorithms for political manipulation. We will not be treating users like lab rats for social experiments, or labeling alternative views as “disinformation.” We will not silence our fellow citizens simply because they might be wrong—or worse, because we think that Americans “can’t handle the truth.”

It will be as free, vibrant, lively, and diverse as America itself. And Truth Social is only the beginning of our plans. The Trump Media and Technology Group will also be launching an on-demand video streaming service that competes with the increasingly “woke” and politicized ‘entertainment’ programming created by Big Tech and Big Media players. TMTG also sees opportunities to create “cancel-proof” alternatives in other key areas ranging from web services to payment processing.

In the end, a small number of powerful people who all think the same and wish to silence anyone who thinks differently cannot be trusted to control almost every major media, technology, and entertainment company in America. I am determined to break their chokehold over the voices of the American People—not just for myself and my own supporters, but for the United States of America!​
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish, David L, SJGUSMC21 and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom