US Elections (& Politics) :)

Here's hoping that Depp, one of countless Follywood elitists that have been so high on their pedestals for so long that the thin air has damaged their brains, gets what he deserves. Their inflated egos and extreme senses of valuable self-worth have kept them aloft for too long, IMO.

FWIW, I'm as concerned about the process and outcome of this trial as I am with what any other of his type is up to right now.....it's just not possible for me to care any less. :headbang:
 
vellage.jpg
 
destroy.jpg
 



However throughout the book Hillary paints the picture of how government should be involved. Some would argue she infers "The Village" is the government.
 
Last edited:
^^^ That's odd. I distinctly remember a video of her giving a speech to a bunch of rich marxocrats where she said those words exactly.
 
^^^ That's odd. I distinctly remember a video of her giving a speech to a bunch of rich marxocrats where she said those words exactly.
A few years after this book, Bill was impeached.


Clinton has been criticized for not giving credit to a ghostwriter in connection with It Takes a Village. The majority of the book was reportedly written by ghostwriter Barbara Feinman.[14] When the book was first announced in April 1995, The New York Times reported publisher Simon & Schuster as saying "The book will actually be written by Barbara Feinman, a journalism professor at Georgetown University in Washington. Ms. Feinman will conduct a series of interviews with Mrs. Clinton, who will help edit the resulting text."[1]

Feinman spent seven months on the project and was paid $120,000 for her work.[15] Feinman, however, was not mentioned anywhere in the book. Clinton's acknowledgment section began: "It takes a village to bring a book into the world, as everyone who has written one knows. Many people have helped me to complete this one, sometimes without even knowing it. They are so numerous that I will not even attempt to acknowledge them individually, for fear that I might leave one out."[16] During her promotional tour for the book, Clinton said, "I actually wrote the book ... I had to write my own book because I want to stand by every word."[3] Clinton stated that Feinman assisted in interviews and did some editorial drafting of "connecting paragraphs", while Clinton herself wrote the final manuscript in longhand.[3]

This led Feinman to complain at the time to Capitol Style magazine over the lack of acknowledgement.[17] In 2001, The Wall Street Journal reported that "New York literary circles are buzzing with vitriol over Sen. Clinton's refusal, so far, to share credit with any writer who helps on her book."[18] Later, in a 2002 article for The Writer's Chronicle,[19] Barbara Feinman Todd (now using her married name) related that the project with Clinton had gone smoothly, producing drafts in a round-robin style. Feinman agrees that Clinton was involved with the project, but also states that, "Like any first lady, Mrs. Clinton had an extremely hectic schedule and writing a book without assistance would have been logistically impossible." Feinman reiterates that her only objection to the whole process was the lack of any acknowledgement. A 2005 Georgetown University web page bio for Barbara Feinman Todd states that It Takes a Village was one of "several high-profile books" that she has "assisted, as editor, writer and researcher."[20] Feinman Todd wrote more about the collaboration in her 2017 memoir Pretend I'm Not Here.[21]
 
No, Hillary, herself, in all her "glory", said those exact words in a speech she made. The tape is out there somewhere I'm sure. It may be hidden by now, who knows, but I have seen it and I'm sure a lot of others have as well.
 
No, Hillary, herself, in all her "glory", said those exact words in a speech she made. The tape is out there somewhere I'm sure. It may be hidden by now, who knows, but I have seen it and I'm sure a lot of others have as well.
If she really said it or wrote it in those exact words, it would be easy to find.

Regardless, if she were president, she would be pushing CRT and the trans cult ideology harder than Biden.
 
Mr. Durham was busy last night, submitting another court filing re:Sussman.

Durham surprised all of us who are following the Sussmann case with a wee-hours-of-the-morning filing last night. It addresses Durham’s claimed joint venture or conspiracy that Durham argues permits introduction of otherwise hearsay evidence: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

Notably, for the first time Durham details a meeting on August 12, 2016, amongst Sussmann, the lead campaign lawyer, Marc Elias, Rodney Joffe (Tech Executive-1), and one of the founders of Fusion GPS (either Simpson or Fritsch, presumably).

Testimony in another case suggests that Laura Seago of Fusion may also been at that meeting, at which plans were discussed to collect and disseminate data and reports creating a “narrative” that Trump and Moscow were in close communication.

Durham’s description of the venture and its purpose puts a lie to the position taken by all who claim that everything Fusion was involved in while working with Perkins Coie was privileged. The. game was to create opposition research to give to the FBI and the press.

As he usually dies, Durham dropped another hint at some new, previously unknown aspect of the scheme that Durham is focusing on. In a footnote on the last page of the brief, Durham hints that Joffe may have improperly used his position at Neustar.

Here’s the footnote: “For example, as a result of perceived pressure to please Tech Executive-1 because of his role as a data provider for the Agency-1 contract, Researcher-1 ultimately sent an email endorsing Tech Executive-1’s draft white paper that the defendant would later…

provide to the FBI, stating: ‘A DNS expert would poke several holes to this hypothesis (primarily around visibility, about which very smartly you do not talk about). That being said, I do not think even the top security (non-DNS) researchers can refute your statements. Nice!’”

This suggestion of “perceived pressure” from Joffe is new. It raises the issue of whether Joffe used his position of control over private and govt data needed by prospective govt contractors, in order to unethically extract something from them.

The heart of this illicit scheme involved use of non public, sensitive data some of which were only available under sensitive govt contracts. Joffe stood in the middle as more or less a gatekeeper. Did he leverage that position, in breach of govt contracts, to misuse that data?

In recent briefing Durham has argued that notwithstanding the fact that over five years have passed since the meeting with the CIA about Yotaphones, Joffe still has possible criminal exposure because there are federal fraud crimes with longer than a five year SOL.

Durham is likely referring to 18 USC section 1031, which makes it a crime to commit fraud with respect to a govt contract having a value of $1 million or more. The statute of limitations is seven years. Read it here: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18…

So Durham’s latest breadcrumbs raise the question of whether he is considering charging Joffe with major fraud under Section 1031, for misusing sensitive data generated under a contract with the EOP, or data sold to Ga Tech by Neustar for use in the DARPA contract.

Finally, this is speculation, but in citing the CIA’s findings that the data given to them by Sussmann were likely “user created,” there is the specter that Joffe and his team may not only misappropriated secret govt data to use for political purposes,

… but they could have fabricated some of that data. Could such misuse and deceptive fabrication be part of a scheme “to obtain … property by means of false pretenses” in connection with the procurement of a govt contract? Or a fraud against the United States?

Section 1031 is the one fraud statute that jumps out as something Durham may be contemplating for charges against Joffe.
• • •
https:/threadreaderapp.com/thread/1517854814805409794?refresh=1650742232

9:16 AM · Apr 23, 2022·Twitter for iPhone
https:/twitter.com/KingMakerFT/status/1517854814805409794
https:/twitter.com/KingMakerFT/status/1517867843873816578
10:07 AM · Apr 23, 2022·Twitter for iPhone