The Trial |
Sussmann’s trial was the first major courtroom test of special prosecutor John Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. It’s unclear how this not guilty verdict will affect Durham’s larger investigation, but it is a major blow to it. The special counsel issued a prepared statement after the verdict saying, “While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury’s decision.” Sussmann celebrated his victory in a statement from the courthouse steps. |
The Case Against Sussmann |
Sussmann is charged with lying to the FBI during one specific meeting, but legally, lying to the FBI is only a felony if the lie is germain to a relevant investigation. Essentially, even if the prosecution was successful in showing that he lied, which many argue they were, they would also need to be successful in showing that the lie materially impacted an ongoing FBI investigation, which was disputed by the defense. The defense argued that the FBI was aware that Sussmann was a partisan when they received his information, and they factored that knowledge into their handling of his information, so even though Sussmann falsely presented himself as a private citizen not connected to any political campaign, the FBI knew otherwise. The scope of the charge was also fairly narrow and included only communication that occured during one specific meeting, whereas some of the false information was communicated via text message before that meeting. The statute of limitations for the crime had already passed when prosecutors obtained those text messages, so they couldn’t add them to the indictment, which weakened their case. Remember: The jury pool is coming from a jurisdiction that voted more than 90% for Clinton, and there was evidence that the jurors largely favored her over Donald Trump politically. |
I have said this before that we are following the third century of the Roman Empire. Most will not understand this comment.We live in a country where 50%+ of the populace no longer differentiates right from wrong and as they have been trained to believe by the liberal Democrats, the law no longer matters. The decay is past the point of salvaging.
NOTE: Large E-mailings promoting our particular socio-political point of view encounter mysterious "distribution issues". Yes, it's true.
Today we are welcoming 1,000s of supporters who have previously been blocked for various reasons from receiving these newsletters. WELCOME!
Over 200 Defending The Republic newsletters are archived on our website - HERE ... Peruse them to get a feel for our format as well as hundreds of informative articles on issues of concern.
Questions or comments? Contact editor@defendingtherepublic.org
In what appears to be a proactive move to get out ahead of identified voting system irregularities specific to the electronic voting systems, the Dept of Homeland Security, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (DHS-CISA), updated the election page on their website under the "Rumor Control" section. DHS made the update on May 27, 2022, last week.
The very next day, May 28, 2022, The Washington Post produces an article describing an upcoming DHS-CISA 5-page memorandum that is in the process of being sent to the states ahead of a public release.
With the WaPo being the outlet of choice for the intelligence community & security state, it appears they received an advanced copy to help establish an early response effort.
For a group of government bureaucrats that are so confident there's no 'there, there', they sure are putting a lot of energy into delivering all the talking points ahead of the actual election reports and state advisories.
QUOTE: In conclusion, the preponderance of current evidence is pointing towards a hypothesis for the origin of this outbreak which is increasingly consistent with prior "war game" scenario planning, remarkably akin to that which occurred during Event 201, which posits emergence of an engineered Monkeypox virus into the human population during mid-May of 2022.
Draw your own conclusions, and do your own diligence.
QUOTE: Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley gave the commencement speech at West Point last weekend, warning graduates of the new threats they'll face. Word to the wise, cadets: Milley isn't a guy anyone should listen to, on this or anything else. He's been disastrously wrong time and again, for years.
Where to start? Milley defended the decision to leave more than 100 Americans stranded in Afghanistan after the US pullout and called the withdrawal a "logistical success." And let's not forget the bungled US drone attack that killed an aid worker there, as well as two other adults and seven children. Milley first cast that as a "righteous strike," later admitting he was wrong. Oopsie!
At home, he reportedly undermined then-President Donald Trump, going behind his back to calm Chinese military bigs' fears about the prez's possible actions and calling Trump's stolen election claims a "Reichstag moment." He bizarrely defended the Army's inclusion of woke nonsense on the West Point curriculum by citing so-called "white rage" — a subject that has zero to do with contemporary warfighting.
But he's hardly alone on the "never listen to them" list.
Some others: Dr. Anthony Fauci. Christopher Steel. Randi Weingarten. James Clapper. Jake Sullivan.
QUOTE: Mr. Biden spent his week in Asia talking about the economy back home. Aficionados of how the president arranges reality have noted that the Putin-did-it rationale for the troubled U.S. economy is giving way to the argument that it's an economy "in transition." As the art of political nomenclature, this is progress, and I'd say Mr. Biden's argument deserves a hearing.
The only thing we know today is that the pre-existing status quo is gone. When Joe Biden and Brian Deese say they want to transition to an economy with more "stable and resilient" growth, they are describing their alternative to the prepandemic froth. That vision has two goals.
The first is to use taxes and government-guided capital investments to compensate for the widening spread between the incomes of knowledge-economy workers and everyone else. The other goal, of course, is their great white whale—a non-fossil-fuel economy. Growth, they assume, will be slower in their economy but somehow steadier and more predictable. Substance aside, the progressive economic model is on its way down the political drain. Mr. Biden admitted as much in Tokyo when he remarked that passing his Build Back Better agenda would have lowered child and family-care costs and tempered the effects of inflation. Of course, it's not happening.
Still, this grand progressive experiment—a final choice between the U.S. as a welfare state or a growth state—came within one Senate vote of reality. Sen. Joe Manchin blocked creation of the transfer-payment state, and the Democrats' massive Covid outlays produced insurmountable political problems with inflation and labor-market distortions. The green-energy dream—whose relentlessly ignored costs will always be at cross purposes with their transfer payments high costs—is on hold for this election cycle and probably the presidential election in 2024.
Republicans will pocket November but shouldn't gloat. Mr. Deese is right to say the goal is a stable, resilient economy. But they blew it.
Their post-pandemic economy is a historic train wreck. The political gods, in their unfathomable wisdom, have handed Republicans a once-in-a-generation chance to help voters understand how to build a future from this ruin. Start talking.
Yeah, they don't see the implications of falsely accusing a Presidential candidate then President for over 4 years.We live in a country where 50%+ of the populace no longer differentiates right from wrong and as they have been trained to believe by the liberal Democrats, the law no longer matters. The decay is past the point of salvaging.
Whooda thunk Perkins Coie had an FBI workspace established onsite in their Washington, DC offices?
https:/theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/05/31/breaking-the-fbi-maintains-a-workspace-including-computer-portal-inside-the-law-firm-of-perkins-coie-the-ramifications-are-significant/
https:/www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/rep-matt-gaetz-dnc-law-firm-perkins-coie-admits-fbi-workspace-dc-office-michael-sussmann-operating-worksite-video/
Rep. Matt Gaetz: DNC Law Firm Perkins Coie Admits It Has FBI Workspace in Its DC Office and Michael Sussmann was Operating the Worksite (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
Published May 31, 2022 at 8:42pm
Not only does it appear that Perkins Coie housed a special workspace for the FBI at their law offices, but Sussmann had an FBI badge that allowed him access to FBI HQ. Watch Sen Kennedy confront Wray (who of course evades the question) last week:
https:/www.c-span.org/video/?c5017350/user-clip-kennedy-wray