Worldwide " ANON APP " AFP FBI Arrests .

Joined
Dec 6, 2014
Messages
3,664
Reaction score
15,181
Location
South Dakota
I have been reading a LOT of stories about this. Not One Single Story or "Journalist" asked what COURTS or JUDGES authorized wiretap or electronic surveillance warrants. NO story examined this from the standpoint of constitutionality. How the hell is that possible?

Violent Criminal ASSholes running crime organizations SUCK and they should be thrown into prisons. Violations of the constitution by our own government really SUCKS to an equal or greater amount as it erodes everyone's liberty.
How the hell does NO "news" organization ask these questions?
 

alastairstevenson

Staff member
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
15,966
Reaction score
6,795
Location
Scotland
I have been reading a LOT of stories about this. Not One Single Story or "Journalist" asked what COURTS or JUDGES authorized wiretap or electronic surveillance warrants. NO story examined this from the standpoint of constitutionality. How the hell is that possible?
Does that apply in this situation when law enforcement owns the company and system that provides the app, as opposed to requiring access to a 3rd party system?
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2014
Messages
3,664
Reaction score
15,181
Location
South Dakota
Another aspect, regarding "legality", is that most of this seems to have happened in foreign countries using equipment/systems supplied and developed by the FeeBeeEye. That kind of eliminates warrants in all those cases since it didn't happen here.
Yup-- lots of Australia connections apparently. I am wondering about US citizens who were surveilled using this technology. I am still wondering how no news organizations asked ANY questions about due process rights or surveillance warrants. I looked at 7 or 8 articles from major sources-- none asked a single question about this part of the story.

My OTHER question is this..... Did HUNTER have one of these phones? :winktongue: :lmao: :rofl:
 
Top