Hello Everyone, cool site you have here. I have spent the past 4 hours looking for a wifi security camera as Christmas Gift, and come to the conclusion I am looking in the wrong place (PCMag reviews, Amazon, etc.) Then I stumbled in here and have just learned that I know even less than I thought I did about all IP connected security cameras. (I'm solid in networking myself, not so solid in IP Camera tech
) Hoping some of the experts here could offer some advice for me... Here are my constraints:
Primary User: Elderly couple, whatever I get has to be EASY for them. I'm not looking for a system that requires maintenance, primarily a device or two that can be 'set and forget'.
Location: They live in the sticks and have a super-slow wifi connection with data caps. I'm interested in minimizing data usage.
Use Case 1: This is the primary use case. They have some motion sensors already installed to tell them if something is moving at the driveway. However, they can't tell what it is without getting up and looking out the window. I want to give them a screen to look outside without having to get up. I want the live stream data they are viewing to be local - it could be across wifi as long as it doesn't rely on a cloud-connected service. In other words I want to view the live stream on the LAN not the WAN.
Use Case 2: I think the 'cloud storage' features I have read about are interesting as a means to have an image of whoever may be trespassing on the property - and have it backed up even in the event the house is ransacked and all the camera gear is stolen. As I mentioned earlier, given the internet usage restrictions, ideally this would be configurable to turn on or off at will. I don't want to pay a monthly fee for this service, but if a basic plan is included with the camera, that would be OK.
Live Feed access: Most likely they would access the feed either from a laptop or an Android tablet.
Budget: Probably around $200
Is this do-able? My biggest roadblock has been trying to decipher all these ads from nest, Amazon, blink, arlo, etc. who all advertise Live Stream but they all seem to require that the live stream go from the camera to their central cloud service and then right back to the home to be viewed. It makes no sense to me, the live stream should be locally viewable. Thanks for any advice you can offer!

Primary User: Elderly couple, whatever I get has to be EASY for them. I'm not looking for a system that requires maintenance, primarily a device or two that can be 'set and forget'.
Location: They live in the sticks and have a super-slow wifi connection with data caps. I'm interested in minimizing data usage.
Use Case 1: This is the primary use case. They have some motion sensors already installed to tell them if something is moving at the driveway. However, they can't tell what it is without getting up and looking out the window. I want to give them a screen to look outside without having to get up. I want the live stream data they are viewing to be local - it could be across wifi as long as it doesn't rely on a cloud-connected service. In other words I want to view the live stream on the LAN not the WAN.
Use Case 2: I think the 'cloud storage' features I have read about are interesting as a means to have an image of whoever may be trespassing on the property - and have it backed up even in the event the house is ransacked and all the camera gear is stolen. As I mentioned earlier, given the internet usage restrictions, ideally this would be configurable to turn on or off at will. I don't want to pay a monthly fee for this service, but if a basic plan is included with the camera, that would be OK.
Live Feed access: Most likely they would access the feed either from a laptop or an Android tablet.
Budget: Probably around $200
Is this do-able? My biggest roadblock has been trying to decipher all these ads from nest, Amazon, blink, arlo, etc. who all advertise Live Stream but they all seem to require that the live stream go from the camera to their central cloud service and then right back to the home to be viewed. It makes no sense to me, the live stream should be locally viewable. Thanks for any advice you can offer!