Ukraine related: Was Ukraine Government Is Handing Out Guns To Citizens, What Happened to Gun Control?

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
13,650
Reaction score
22,741
1668267349970.png




Interesting comment: ( I do believe Russia mixed into the mandatory evacuation of some civilians to reduce the chances of Russian Military from getting hit while crossing .. no doubt imho )


S Myzeqari

I honestly believe that the Russians withdrew the bulk of their forces disguised as civilians that's why they ordered the mandatory evacuation of Kherson, so their forces could safety cross the river with/as civilian without being targeted and pummeled by artillery.

1668268325200.png
 
Last edited:

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
13,650
Reaction score
22,741
Good summary of Kherson ..


After Kherson: What's next in the war?

Anders Puck Nielsen
Nov 12, 2022

Russia has retreated from Kherson, but the war is far from over. There is no reason to believing that peace is around the corner. But we are moving into a new phase of the war, and in this video I look at what that might mean. And then I look at what's at stake for Russia's general Surovikin, because there will hardly be tolerance for more losses on his watch.

 

N-i-k-s-o-n

Pulling my weight
Joined
Apr 25, 2022
Messages
144
Reaction score
111
Location
Moscow
IMG_20221115_233419_423.jpgIMG_20221115_233424_597.jpg
Photos of parts of the rocket that fell in Poland. This is a missile from the S300 (SA-10 Grumble) anti-aircraft missile system, which is located in the city of Kamenka-Bugskaya, Lviv region of Ukraine. In this regard, can we assume that Ukraine attacked one of the NATO countries, and, thus, the NATO countries should bring down their military power on Ukraine? A grain dryer in Poland - why not a reason for a nuclear apocalypse? :winktongue:
 

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
13,650
Reaction score
22,741
View attachment 145718View attachment 145719
Photos of parts of the rocket that fell in Poland. This is a missile from the S300 (SA-10 Grumble) anti-aircraft missile system, which is located in the city of Kamenka-Bugskaya, Lviv region of Ukraine. In this regard, can we assume that Ukraine attacked one of the NATO countries, and, thus, the NATO countries should bring down their military power on Ukraine? A grain dryer in Poland - why not a reason for a nuclear apocalypse? :winktongue:
View attachment 145718View attachment 145719
Photos of parts of the rocket that fell in Poland. This is a missile from the S300 (SA-10 Grumble) anti-aircraft missile system, which is located in the city of Kamenka-Bugskaya, Lviv region of Ukraine. In this regard, can we assume that Ukraine attacked one of the NATO countries, and, thus, the NATO countries should bring down their military power on Ukraine? A grain dryer in Poland - why not a reason for a nuclear apocalypse? :winktongue:

Russia has been using S-300 as ground to ground attack .. so depending on the radar track, we can determine where these missiles originated from .. If Belarus .. well ..


1668546213472.png
 

Griswalduk

Known around here
Joined
Mar 30, 2021
Messages
1,088
Reaction score
2,043
Location
Uk
View attachment 145718View attachment 145719
Photos of parts of the rocket that fell in Poland. This is a missile from the S300 (SA-10 Grumble) anti-aircraft missile system, which is located in the city of Kamenka-Bugskaya, Lviv region of Ukraine. In this regard, can we assume that Ukraine attacked one of the NATO countries, and, thus, the NATO countries should bring down their military power on Ukraine? A grain dryer in Poland - why not a reason for a nuclear apocalypse? :winktongue:
It's amazing that this story has only just hit the headlines with investigations at an early stage but already there's so called pictures on the Russian propaganda channels. If the Kremlin are so good at solving things they will have no problems coping with a consignment of ATACMS and a wave of smoking related mishaps

Summer is coming :rofl:


1668547812885.png
 

Griswalduk

Known around here
Joined
Mar 30, 2021
Messages
1,088
Reaction score
2,043
Location
Uk
Whether he is a freak'n putz, mass murderer, or just a madman, WHY would he fire on Poland? That I don't get
Things are at an early stage and the Times radio clip is a more measured analysis of whats known or more specifically what's not known as this time. Could be a stray missile / missiles, a genuine fuck up or indeed a provocation to name some options. As @N-i-k-s-o-n also says Ukraine or even the allied forces could have messed up or be up to no good.

In the end it might not matter. By invading Ukraine and committing genocide Russia has put itself in a position of blame. A position it didn't need to be in and in a war that didn't need to happen
 

wrapter

Getting comfortable
Joined
Jul 17, 2022
Messages
547
Reaction score
2,087
Location
MY
Ukraine probably tried to do a false flag and get nato involved. But I doubt any Nato country is looking for a direct conflict with russia, since there will be no winners even before nukes are involved.
All the talk of no fly zone in ukraine is pipe dream. Nato aircraft will be dropped like flies, the moment they start flying above 500 feet altitude.

Just like how russia cannot find the S300 and buk air defense hiding under tree cover and buildings via sattelite. Nato will also have the same problem. Example even f117 stealth aircrafts have been shot down with air defense systems that are vastly inferior compared to modern S300/400 and Buk defense.

Even a synethic aperature radar scan from a F35 cannot spot them unless the vehicles are on open fields or roads.

Only human intelligence or eyes on ground seems to work in ukraine, with regard to location of mobile AA defense
 

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
13,650
Reaction score
22,741
Ukraine probably tried to do a false flag and get nato involved. But I doubt any Nato country is looking for a direct conflict with russia, since there will be no winners even before nukes are involved.
All the talk of no fly zone in ukraine is pipe dream. Nato aircraft will be dropped like flies, the moment they start flying above 500 feet altitude.

Just like how russia cannot find the S300 and buk air defense hiding under tree cover and buildings via sattelite. Nato will also have the same problem. Example even f117 stealth aircrafts have been shot down with air defense systems that are vastly inferior compared to modern S300/400 and Buk defense.

Even a synethic aperature radar scan from a F35 cannot spot them unless the vehicles are on open fields or roads.

Only human intelligence or eyes on ground seems to work in ukraine, with regard to location of mobile AA defense
Ukraine has no reason at this point to do a false flag here especially when the chances of evidence of a false flag coming out is very high ..
( Ukraine already winning, just needs continued support .. )

Look at all the Flag Flag operations which Russia attempted, and how many were spoiled with evidence ..

False Flags not as easy to do any more ..
 

Griswalduk

Known around here
Joined
Mar 30, 2021
Messages
1,088
Reaction score
2,043
Location
Uk
Ukraine probably tried to do a false flag and get nato involved. But I doubt any Nato country is looking for a direct conflict with russia, since there will be no winners even before nukes are involved.
All the talk of no fly zone in ukraine is pipe dream. Nato aircraft will be dropped like flies, the moment they start flying above 500 feet altitude.

Just like how russia cannot find the S300 and buk air defense hiding under tree cover and buildings via sattelite. Nato will also have the same problem. Example even f117 stealth aircrafts have been shot down with air defense systems that are vastly inferior compared to modern S300/400 and Buk defense.

Even a synethic aperature radar scan from a F35 cannot spot them unless the vehicles are on open fields or roads.

Only human intelligence or eyes on ground seems to work in ukraine, with regard to location of mobile AA defense
You seem to be suffering from a severe dose of wishful thinking, no doubt in part to those Nazi defence forums you frequent. The reality is the bulk of Russia's badly performing military resources are in Ukraine. It's borders and territories are more or less defenceless including the fatherland, Kaliningrad, Kuril Islands and wherever else Russia lays claim to. Putin has left the country defenceless with it's pants down in pursuit of an answer to the Ukrainian question.

There is two primary reasons NATO does not take advantage.

1. It can't because Russia has and always has had the ultimate deterrent in the form of nukes.
2. NATO is not and never was the aggressor.

NATO was never a threat. The Fuhrer lies to commit genocide.

Summer is coming:D
 
Top