Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/937bd/937bdd1aae56dbefcab84243396b92d50d49c71f" alt="www.thegatewaypundit.com"
BREAKING: Federal Judge Overturns California's AR15 Ban | The Gateway Pundit | by Brock Simmons
If you can believe it, a Federal judge in California has overturned the state’s onerous AR15 and “assault weapons” ban.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1c64/c1c644b2abe2635a230c3ae1818d232f58aeb5ce" alt="www.thegatewaypundit.com"
![]()
BREAKING: Federal Judge Overturns California's AR15 Ban | The Gateway Pundit | by Brock Simmons
If you can believe it, a Federal judge in California has overturned the state’s onerous AR15 and “assault weapons” ban.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Having been on the same boat with @SJGUSMC21 during the tragic accident, I too lost a plain Jane WASR AK. Though unlike the Sarge, I had yet to become proficient with it.
I must say that my Sig 516 .556 was extremely reliable and due to the gas piston design, the bcg and internals stayed (relatively) clean even after a 1300 round 3 day carbine class.
Damn I miss those guns ...
.556 X-Tac 55gr coming down. Now $.70 per round in case quantities.
![]()
PMC X-TAC 5.56 NATO XM193 FMJ | Ammunition Depot
Perfect for AR-15 owners, these PMC X-TAC 5.56 NATO XM193 55 Grain FMJ cartridges are available now for online purchase at Ammunition Depot.www.ammunitiondepot.com
It’s a start
We do have background checks that are required on every gun purchase. There is no "gun show loophole". It is a lie told by politicians who know nothing about firearms or firearms laws in an effort to scare others who are oblivious to the existing laws.
The reason why we have these school mass shootings (or almost every other mass shooting) is because the criminal is the only one on the scene with a gun. They know this. That is why they choose these locations. They know they will not meet armed resistance. A properly trained teacher, security guard, ex-cop/military placed in the location with quick access to a rifle would put an end to the event pretty quick. Also, once these criminals learn that their criminal efforts are very likely to result in them losing their life very quickly, you will see a drastic reduction in mass shooting attempts.
They are too fixated on the guns themselves, though. With over 300 million guns already in the US, they are not going anywhere, laws or not. Criminals will access them, laws or not.
Idiot politicians are the cause of our gun violence problem.
Keeping guns out of the wrong hands
Many if not most of our mass shooters are not previous offenders or terrorists. Meaning they would get a gun no matter how draconian you make the laws. And the ones who couldn't get a gun legally stole it. Criminals don't care about gun laws. You will never get the illegal guns off the street. Stricter laws just take them out of the hands of law abiding people who actually respect laws. That good guy with a gun might be the one to stop the next mass shooting.
Medical information
4. You must disclose any relevant physical or mental health conditions that you have been diagnosed with or treated for in the past as this may affect your ability to safely possess and use a firearm or shotgun. Relevant medical conditions which must be disclosed are listed in note 5. Sections 27 and 28 of the Firearms Act 1968 (as amended) specify that in order to issue a firearm or shotgun certificate the chief officer of police must be satisfied that an applicant can be permitted to possess a gun ‘without danger to the public safety or the peace’. Medical fitness is one of the factors police must consider when assessing a person’s suitability. FORM 201 – 2017 - 1 Page13
5. Relevant medical conditions which must be disclosed are:
• Acute Stress Reaction or an acute reaction to the stress caused by a trauma
• Suicidal thoughts or self harm
• Depression or anxiety
• Dementia
• Mania, bipolar disorder or a psychotic illness
• A personality disorder
• A neurological condition: for example, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s or Huntington’s diseases, or epilepsy
• Alcohol or drug abuse
• Any other mental or physical condition which might affect your safe possession of a firearm or shotgun If in doubt, consult your GP or contact the police firearms licensing department.
6. If you have disclosed a relevant medical condition the police may ask you to obtain a medical report from your GP/specialist. You are expected to meet the cost if a fee is charged for this. If further information is required the police may request and pay for a further report.
7. Where no relevant medical conditions are disclosed the police will contact your GP asking if they are aware of any relevant medical conditions or have any concerns about the grant of the firearm or shotgun certificate.
Depending on the reply, the police may ask you to obtain a medical report from your GP/specialist. You are expected to meet the cost if a fee is charged for this. If further information is required the police may request and pay for a further report.
8. The police will ask your GP to place an encoded reminder on your patient record to indicate that you have been issued with a firearm or shotgun certificate.
The GP is asked to notify the police if, following issue of the certificate, you are diagnosed with or treated for a relevant medical condition (listed in note 5), or if the GP has other concerns about your possession of a certificate that might affect your safe possession of firearms.
Following contact from your GP there may be a need for a medical report to be obtained to assist with assessment of your continued suitability to possess a firearm or shotgun certificate. The police will pay if a medical report is required.
And even if they did magically remove millions of guns, these murderers would just turn to another method of killing. Car, knife, bomb, gun. They are all just tools.
Nobody wants mass shootings, but they want to do it in a very ineffectual way.
Let's actually enforce the gun laws we have on the books, first. Looking at you, leaders of Democrat controlled cities.
You would get prosectued and possibly have your certificate revoked if they found a single round of ammunition outside of the gun safe nevermind a gun when the guns were not in use ie being transported to or from a shoot or in use at a shoot.
Many have mental health issues though. In the UK your doctors' records would stop you getting a gun.
The Medical Checks in the UK (taken from the Firearms Application Form) - Not all of these would be an automatic bar. Some conditions in the past or well under control may still allow the grant if medical advice supports it.
BTW GP = General Practitioner ie Family Doctor in US terms. Expand the below quote, you'll find the checks massive!
As you can see your medical records are flagged even after a grant and if concerns are raised at a later date by the GP, then your certificate can be suspended or revoked and your guns seized pending a further medical report.
Additionally, the certificate has to be renewed every 5 years where checks are done again. In between, any incidents of unlawful behaviour eg getting into a fight, violence, domestic violence, drinking offences, drink driving, even speeding (bit excessive that one in my opinion but logic is you're showing a propensity to break the law), etc may lead to revocation.
Also, if a member of the public or employer or neighbour etc reports concerns, these are investigated and again if they involve any of the above, or anything that may raise concerns, it may lead to revocation or refusal.
In the UK it's not uncommon for people involved in divorce proceedings to have certificates supsendedd or revoked whilst the divorce is under way and for a period afterwards to prevent firearms being used as a result of domestic disputes during the divorce.
I agree. If someone is determined enough they will always find a way. I predicted terrorists would run people over in cars if guns were unavailable years before the 1st attack.
The difference in the UK vs US, as you cna see is much more comprehensive checking of suitability (don't forget the above is just medical) there's still the criminal checks, known associations, checks on social media for illegal activities / threats to kill or of violence / suicide / anger and depression etc.
Regarding illegal guns, that's why UK safekeeping is so strict. You would get prosectued and possibly have your certificate revoked if they found a single round of ammunition outside of the gun safe nevermind a gun when the guns were not in use ie being transported to or from a shoot or in use at a shoot. If the gun was simply loaded in transport, you get arrested / revoked. Our laws on safe keeping to prevent criminals getting guns are very strict even down to the types of locks fitted to the doors on your home, the safe specifications (thickness of steel, type of hinges, shielding of the hinges to prevent jemmying, specifiation of the lock and key) etc, the locations (usually hidden) where they can be fixed, what they can be fixed to and how (usually rawl bolted to a brick wall by, from memory at least 5 points), and specifying home security systems.
I know the US is different here as in the US you have a right to use guns in self defence depending on the state. However, a sensible precaution in the US depending on the state would be to require the gun to be secured unless on your person at the time, so no unsecured guns left around. I know you guys have locked holders that can be attached to furniture keeping the gun ready but locked into the holder. That would seem to be sensible if its not on your person or otuside of a central safe.
Wow, this would never fly here. What is the point of having a firearm, then? "Excuse me, Mr. Murderer, please wait while I go unlock my gun and ammo, then load my magazine. Then I can can defend my life against you, while you are already holding some type of weapon".
The difference is there are people that don't go to the doctor for mental help. So if you have never been diagnosed no one knows.. If you have tried to commit suicide you aren't allowed to possess a firearm or ammo for 5 years from what I hear.. Don't know if they check, but I doubt it. People with mental issues shouldn't be allowed access to a firearm but they aren't the only ones that need to be addressed. This country has many laws that aren't enforced. For example If you're a felon they are supposed to do checks and make sure you don't have a firearm or ammo in your house. Guess what... The don't follow through with this.
California for example Firearms Prohibiting Categories
Statistically I'm willing to bet most of the shootings we've had were from a illegally possessed firearm by someone that shouldn't have been able to buy it legally. The news doesn't like to talk about this because it goes against their agenda. Just like we don't hear gang violence or gang shooting anymore..
There are cities that have adopted laws that require firearms to be in a safe. The require you to show proof of safe at home and if not you're required to buy at gun lock before you leave with this new firearm.
Do these numbers seem to skyrocket or stay about the same? FBI — Expanded Homicide Data Table 8
You don't have to go to the doctor to get diagnosed for it to apply.
I'm guessing many people go to the doctor for other things and the doctor notices mental health issues. Over here the fact your doctors records are flagged as a gun owner, means your doctor has to report any concerns as to ownership to the police. So if he notices mental health issues that raise concerns, such as depression or any form of psychosis or delusions, he would have to report those and the police would then come and interview you and maybe suspend yopur certificate / seize weapons pending a medical report from a specialist.
Similarly contact with other agencies such as the police or hospitals probably lead to those issues coming to the authorities attention as do complaints from neighbours etc. Over here, any of that would cause a red flag leading to you being looked at for those issues. Everything is much mnore connected and data shared. When the police run your details if stopped or involved in an incident, again you're flagged as gun owner, so the details of that incident can then be forwarded to firearms licensing.
Simply having a complaint from a neighbour (if found justified and involving any kind of agression) or getting arrested for eg being drunk and disorderly can lead to revocation. Over here, anything that indicates you are prone to break the law, violent or have any kind of drink or drug problem is a red flag to ownership. As I said above, people have been refused / revoked for speeding tickets as it indicates a propensity to ignore the law,
As I've said before I'm not against ownership nor self defence (where permitted by law). However, one thing that is clear is the number of guns in the worng hands in the US and a lot of that comes down to lax secuirty leading to theft and poor background checks on indivduals who clearly aren't suitable.