I have a BI system running 26 cameras i7-6700k and it is running at 85% everything direct to disk. Now I need to build a system for 33 cameras. Any ideas?
33 camera recommendation
- Thread starter bennuss
- Start date
All cameras are running at 15fps I have 23 2.1mp hikvision running at 1080 and 3 4mp running at 2688x1520
I have 8 gb memory
Are you talking about hardware acceleration in BI or in the Bios ?
Is there any way to change common settings on all the cameras at once?
I have 8 gb memory
Are you talking about hardware acceleration in BI or in the Bios ?
Is there any way to change common settings on all the cameras at once?
vpp is video post processing. It can also reduce CPU usage but only with a small number of cameras. More than a few, and it makes things worse.
Hardware acceleration enable/disable affects all cameras by default, assuming you set it from the Blue Iris Options > cameras tab.
Yes, i7-6700k has quick sync.
Hardware acceleration enable/disable affects all cameras by default, assuming you set it from the Blue Iris Options > cameras tab.
Yes, i7-6700k has quick sync.
I turned on hardware accerleration andit dropped down to 71% which is interesting because on another BI server I have a i7 4790k with only 2 less cameras -24 - and it runs at 44%
fenderman
Staff member
- Mar 9, 2014
- 36,891
- 21,406
Tuckerdude
Getting the hang of it
This seemed like as good a thread as any to compare setups and ask a question at the same time. I am currently running an Intel i7-6950x with 128GB of Ram and 26 cameras (15 running at 2MP 20FPs and the other 11 running at 4MP 20 FPS) all set to direct to disc. On average my CPU usage runs at about 58% which I am very happy about. But I am about to add another dozen or so cameras and want to get an opinion from this group. Am I correct in assuming that in addition to overall FPS and Resolution (Per Fenderman), that the greater the number of cores on the CPU, the better? I could be wrong, but when I upgraded last year to these "Extreme" line of processors, I was very surprised at how easily it handled the load. I was pushing 99% almost the whole time before upgrading, and the old hardware was not really that old (maybe one generation ago). If in fact the number of cores plays a substantial role, then I feel like I have a good upgrade path for the future as the new (and very crazy) line of Intel processors is pushing 18 cores with 36 threads. Feels like I should have enough headroom when I decide to add these new cameras.
Any thoughts, feedback, push back on this is welcomed!
Thanks everybody
Any thoughts, feedback, push back on this is welcomed!
Thanks everybody
Tuckerdude
Getting the hang of it
Yes of course....been one of the faithful for several years! 
Actually, I need to correct above statement as I looked at the "Status Window" inside of Blue Iris and got the exact numbers: I have 13 at 2MP 10 at 3MP and 3 at 4MP. Most cameras are at 20 FPS (12 of them are at 30).
update....took a screenshot and thought I would share with you all:
Actually, I need to correct above statement as I looked at the "Status Window" inside of Blue Iris and got the exact numbers: I have 13 at 2MP 10 at 3MP and 3 at 4MP. Most cameras are at 20 FPS (12 of them are at 30).update....took a screenshot and thought I would share with you all:
Attachments
Last edited: