Unless the "overlords" give such a mandate about frames per second, you could always drop the FPS down to 4 or 5 FPS so save on storage.
looks like they've covered that issue:
"Senate Bill 1384 outlines specific standards and parameters that digital video and audio surveillance systems must be able to comply with. For example, the law specifies that the surveillance systems must maintain a frame rate of no less than 15 frames per second, display the date and time, be equipped with a failure notification system, and that all recordings must be stored in a secure manner for authorized users only. "
Ouch, this will not be a quick setup for many FFLs ..
26806. (a) Commencing January 1, 2024, a licensee shall ensure that its business premises are monitored by a digital video surveillance system that meets all of the following requirements:
(1) The system shall clearly record images and, for systems located inside the premises, audio, of the area under surveillance.
(2) Each camera shall be permanently mounted in a fixed location. Cameras shall be placed in locations that allow the camera to clearly record activity occurring in all areas described in paragraph (3) and reasonably produce recordings that allow for the clear identification of any person.
(3) The areas recorded shall include, without limitation, all of the following:
(A) Interior views of all entries or exits to the premises.
(B) All areas where firearms are displayed.
(C) All points of sale, sufficient to identify the parties involved in the transaction.
(4) The system shall continuously record 24 hours per day at a frame rate no less than 15 frames per second.
(5) The media or device on which recordings are stored shall be secured in a manner to protect the recording from tampering, unauthorized access or use, or theft.
(6) Recordings shall be maintained for a minimum of one year.
(7) Recorded images shall clearly and accurately display the date and time.
(8) The system shall be equipped with a failure notification system that provides notification to the licensee of any interruption or failure of the system or storage device.
(b) A licensee shall not use, share, allow access, or otherwise release recordings, to any person except as follows:
(1) A licensee shall allow access to the system to an agent of the department or a licensing authority conducting an inspection of the licensee’s premises, for the purpose of inspecting the system for compliance with this section, and only if a warrant or court order would not generally be required for that access.
(2) A licensee shall allow access to the system or release recordings to any person pursuant to search warrant or other court order.
(3) A licensee may allow access to the system or release recordings to any person in response to an insurance claim or as part of the civil discovery process, including, but not limited to, in response to subpoenas, request for production or inspection, or other court order.
(c) The licensee shall post a sign in a conspicuous place at each entrance to the premises that states in block letters not less than one inch in height:
“THESE PREMISES ARE UNDER VIDEO AND AUDIO SURVEILLANCE. YOUR IMAGE AND CONVERSATIONS MAY BE RECORDED.”
(d) A licensee shall, on an annual basis, provide certification to the department, in a manner prescribed by the department, that its video surveillance system is in proper working order.
(e) This section does not preclude any local authority or local governing body from adopting or enforcing local laws or policies regarding video surveillance that do not contradict or conflict with the requirements of this section.
My next question. Through research it appears H.265 indoors, persons within 20ft, that 2mp at 1024 bitrate would be my minimum required specs to identify someone.
If thats the case, 4.5 TB per camera per year is all I need. (Based on the kb/s from my bolide camera with these settings)
I may bump to 3mp and 2048 bit rate just to be safe. I don’t like riding the fence with these types of laws. Its less stress to provide a little more than minimum.
So, depends on what is specified as Identification quality of the video ..
if that is the I in DORI you need to check the DORI specs for the camera .. iirc about 80 ppf is the specs for what Dahua publishes ..
Wow!
And some of that is left to some government lackeys opinion, instead of true guidelines.
I have read 70-100 ppf is the standard. 3mp at 2024 bit rate should be plenty.
I would be cautious of just using published ppf and low bit rates. The only way to comply with the law, as printed below, is to TEST each cam for facial clarity. Also, remember that increased MP count does not mean better video.
(2) Each camera shall be permanently mounted in a fixed location. Cameras shall be placed in locations that allow the camera to clearly record activity occurring in all areas described in paragraph (3) and reasonably produce recordings that allow for the clear identification of any person.
Its a new California Law for my business.
looks like they've covered that issue:
"Senate Bill 1384 outlines specific standards and parameters that digital video and audio surveillance systems must be able to comply with. For example, the law specifies that the surveillance systems must maintain a frame rate of no less than 15 frames per second, display the date and time, be equipped with a failure notification system, and that all recordings must be stored in a secure manner for authorized users only. "
Ouch, this will not be a quick setup for many FFLs ..
(b) A licensee shall not use, share, allow access, or otherwise release recordings, to any person except as follows:
(1) A licensee shall allow access to the system to an agent of the department or a licensing authority conducting an inspection of the licensee’s premises, for the purpose of inspecting the system for compliance with this section, and only if a warrant or court order would not generally be required for that access.
(2) A licensee shall allow access to the system or release recordings to any person pursuant to search warrant or other court order.
(3) A licensee may allow access to the system or release recordings to any person in response to an insurance claim or as part of the civil discovery process, including, but not limited to, in response to subpoenas, request for production or inspection, or other court order.
(c) The licensee shall post a sign in a conspicuous place at each entrance to the premises that states in block letters not less than one inch in height:
“THESE PREMISES ARE UNDER VIDEO AND AUDIO SURVEILLANCE. YOUR IMAGE AND CONVERSATIONS MAY BE RECORDED.”
Weclome to the world of GDPR and free range criminals.
Now it looks as if you can no longer show your employees pictures of known perps or suspicious characaters you believe are stealing or casing the joint, send the footage to other branches or dealers or online, share footage to Law Enforcement (unless under Warrant, Court Order) and only share as a part of an insurance claim or civil suit, Plus you have to display a large notice saying Criminals cover your faces!!!
So next time there's a robbery and a LE turns up and wants to see the footage to put out an APB and catch the guys, it will be sorry I can't show you, get a Court Order and come back if you want to see it.
At least that's my 5am interpretation of this at a quick glance. Always consult an attorney for a real interpretation / legal view. Like I said it looks almost like GDDP except over here, where LE can have it but only once they're applied in writing in the correct format. I don't deal with GDPR but I think we can at least show them after a crime, just not allow them to have a copy or take photos or videos from the screen. I'm not sure reading the above you can even show them.
Also I think the minimum period we have to retain video for is 14 days not 365 but wouldn't be 100% sure nor know if firearms dealers have special CCTV rules. They don't to my knowledge but that could be wrong. Most non firearm businesses over here tend to retain footage for about a month.
Honestly, based on everything I've read in this thread, I don't think BI is your best choice.
BI needs database maintenance. While you're doing the maintenance (ether automatically or manually) recording is paused. This could be a violation of that law.
As discussed in other threads BI's database is fragile. I don't know if I would want to risk it in your situation.
I would seriously consider an enterprise grade VMS solution like Digital Watchdog IPVMS or something similar.
Digital Watchdog has the following features that in my opinion would be important for you.
DW does not pause recordings for database maintenance.
A second DW server can ack as a failover.
DW supports cloud accounts with 2FA. Cloud accounts can be assigned specific permissions. (Assuming they need remote access)
DW has a feature called "Audit Log". Audit log will document any account that logs in, which camera that was viewed, any zoom windows that were created, and if any video was exported.
DW can set storage as "Main" and "backup". Both storage options can be recorded to simultaneously. IE the main storage is you WD purple drives inside of the server and the backup storage is a NAS or something similar in a secured location. Individual cameras can be selected to record to the backup location.
You can specificy minimum retention time on an individual camera basis.
You can download DW from their website and test it. If you call them they will probably provide you with a free trial key.
The downside to DW is that it is fairly expensive.
How much is digital watchdog roughly?