Yep ,I agree 100% with the both of you on that point. I really care less about the hardware acceleration unless it is actually using a real video card. I get that will add some coin to the light bill. I was hoping for the Amcrest mic support which they told me is coming. Apart from that, from what I wanted , it went well-back then. My issues have all stemmed from recent updates. But yes, I need to find out which version I had that worked well-for my system. For example: Acti E33, no ghosting for 2 years. Yet with the new hardware acceleration addition, ghosting at 4x. Now ghosting at 1x with the most recent update rendering it unusable. Total CPU usage is around 65% so it does not appear to be a machine specific problem. One issue is that the camera has no iframe interval user setting support, instead it is locked to the user fps setting. Again, never an issue in the past. I read more than I post, joined in 2014, only really vocal now because of the issues. If the error is on my end, then I have no problem apologizing but now with a camera that I cannot use which worked fine for 2 years-how would others feel about that?I thought Fenderman made an excellent point earlier. You're complaining about the updates giving you problems. Go back a few to a version that worked for you and stay there until such time as one of the updates peeks your interest so much that you feel the need to update. A lot of users wait for others to post about a certain update being "stable" for them before they update theirs. Myself, I grab each update as they come down the pike and report any bug I see to Ken immediately.
There is no way in this world you're going to find a better value than BI and a guy that is as approachable when you report a bug as Ken has shown himself to be...
Last edited by a moderator: