I have a number of cameras that are using H.264. All are set to record direct to disk in Blue Iris. I am trying to understand the storage requirements for H.264. The following information is from a number of different cameras that have 1 hour files, all files are collected in morning between 2:00AM to 3:00AM. All files are in Black and white, the cameras are in IR mode. All cameras are indoors and there is no motion on any of the cameras. All cameras resolutions 1920x1080
Camera 1:
Max bit rate 1024K
Frame Rate: 1
bit rate type: variable
I frame: 300
Quality: not configurable
file size: 592MB
Camera 2:
Max bit rate 1024K
Frame Rate: 1
bit rate type: variable
I frame: 30
Quality: not configurable
file size: 542MB
Camera 3:
Max bit rate 1024K
Frame Rate: 10
bit rate type: variable
I frame: 40
Quality: medium
file size: 378MB
Camera 4:
Max bit rate 3072K
Frame Rate: 10
bit rate type: variable
I frame: 40
Quality: Higher
file size: 1187MB
Camera 5:
Max bit rate 3072K
Frame Rate: 10
bit rate type: variable
I frame: 40
Quality: Higher
file size: 1179MB
Notes: camera 1 and Camera 2 are the same camera with a different Iframe value, pointing at the same objects on different days. Cameras 3,4 and 5 are the same type of cameras with the same settings pointing at different objects.
Why is camera 2 with a very high Iframe value have slightly less storage then camera 1? I would expected at least 1/4 the storage amount. I would have expected that a higher IFRAME value with a static picture would create much smaller file. As there is no motion then the B,P frames should be empty.
Why does camera 3 have less storage then cameras 1 and 2 with a much higher frame rate and Iframe value?
Do you think that cameras from different Chinese manufactures have that different implementation of the h.264 compression ?
Camera 1:
Max bit rate 1024K
Frame Rate: 1
bit rate type: variable
I frame: 300
Quality: not configurable
file size: 592MB
Camera 2:
Max bit rate 1024K
Frame Rate: 1
bit rate type: variable
I frame: 30
Quality: not configurable
file size: 542MB
Camera 3:
Max bit rate 1024K
Frame Rate: 10
bit rate type: variable
I frame: 40
Quality: medium
file size: 378MB
Camera 4:
Max bit rate 3072K
Frame Rate: 10
bit rate type: variable
I frame: 40
Quality: Higher
file size: 1187MB
Camera 5:
Max bit rate 3072K
Frame Rate: 10
bit rate type: variable
I frame: 40
Quality: Higher
file size: 1179MB
Notes: camera 1 and Camera 2 are the same camera with a different Iframe value, pointing at the same objects on different days. Cameras 3,4 and 5 are the same type of cameras with the same settings pointing at different objects.
Why is camera 2 with a very high Iframe value have slightly less storage then camera 1? I would expected at least 1/4 the storage amount. I would have expected that a higher IFRAME value with a static picture would create much smaller file. As there is no motion then the B,P frames should be empty.
Why does camera 3 have less storage then cameras 1 and 2 with a much higher frame rate and Iframe value?
Do you think that cameras from different Chinese manufactures have that different implementation of the h.264 compression ?