fenderman
Staff member
- Mar 9, 2014
- 36,892
- 21,408
You are completely missing the point...you can flush 1000 dollars down the toilet today...doesnt mean that running that amd machine is now smart...you are spending more money running it than replacing it..where is the logic (and for the record, no, your gaming machine will not use more power...remember tdp is not a way to measure consumption...and if you are loading the system and actually gaming for 8 hours a day, you have bigger problems and dont need cams since youll be home all the time.....sell one of your nucs and replace it with a proper machine...you dont need raid and you dont need six 4tb drives if you interned to record 6 cams on motion...My gaming machine/desktop is a VERY high end setup. Two high end GPUs at 250W each and a 3930k CPU at 130W and those are stock numbers and not over clocked number... yeah, I think my gaming machine running for eight hours a day will easily pull more power than the AMD machine running 24 hours
Thank you VERY much for the partial search results. It looked like the common issue with most was they were using low end NUCs(celeron, pentium, and i3/i5 which are actually mobile... not equivalent of desktop)
More awesome information.
1) I haven't had a chance to fire up the SkullCanyon to see how bad the noise is.
2) I definitely am familiar with the i3/i5/i7 distinction. Intel has done some things to muddy the water between i3/i5/i7 depending upon application. Depending upon level of overclocking, some i3s will beat i5s.
3) To follow on this, Blue Iris doesn't use quick sync for encoding for write?
4) Good news. I wasn't sure if Blue Iris liked 32GB or more 16GB is my usual for machines.
5) Thank you for the analysis here. It looks like my plan for four or six 4TB drives in raid6 will be more than sufficient. My plan is to record only motion on about six or so cameras. At least two cameras will be 'buried' so only breaking in would result in motion.