You need to slow down. I would wait on committing to any cameras until you do more research and you need to read.
You either need a camera that works for your install location, or an install location that works for your camera.
Where are you wanting to capture license plates? In your driveway? On the street?
You also need to read BigRed's post again.
The mentality a lot of people have is they want to see everything, but when it comes time to use their capture as evidence, they lack the detail. It also doesn't help that most Box and Cloud systems will come with 2.8mm cameras and only exacerbate the problem.
One camera cannot do it all. Several incorrectly spec'd cameras isn't the solution either. 2.8mm isn’t always the answer, but neither is 32mm.
You cannot see everything and still see details. Getting good details does not allow you to see everything; it is a give and take.
This is why a good system will have cameras that complement each other, and work well in low light. This is also why a PTZ is a complement to a good, already established system and should not be heavily relied on by itself.
When planning your system and layout start by focusing on choke points and set up fields of view to capture details and give the ability to ID. This means all this camera will be able to do/see is the very narrow scope of its job. You can then deploy a more general overview cam to give context to the details. This overview cam can support one or more of your choke point ID cams. Most people tend to start with 1-3 FOVs at/around their front door.
For instance, as an extreme example. I am deploying this camera. It's
only job is to see people walking down the path behind my house. This is what I see 99% of the time when I look at the feed.
However, this is what I see when someone walks down the path, 95' feet away.
I then have these two cameras I can use to get a better idea/context of what they were doing and where they may have come from or gone to. The kill zone is between the green lines and the camera is on the fence at the bottom, center of the picture. You can see someone just entering the KZ and the 3.6mm focal length of this cam gives absolutely no details other than it might be a person.
This is the person in the above wide angle shot, and there is no way you would have been able to tell it was a male, in a red, flannel shirt, with sunglasses, and a receding hairline.
You should look at your system as an investment. Let's say the whole thing has cost me $5000. That is a lot of money, but I now have a higher chance of catching the vandals, thieves, stranger dangerers, etc that come around my house and, because of this, have a greater chance of recovering my loss. If I had not made the investment I would likely be out my loss
PLUS adding on the cost of the system for the next time it might happen. We get posts all of the time with people
reacting to a loss
Stolen Lawn Equipment and Tools
Buy once, cry once, and get experience and knowledge along the way.
I have learned a lot since joining and try to pay it forward when possible. This is a post I put together with images from my journey showing the differences between focal lengths, install heights, changing fields of view, etc.
I am treating this as a living document and will update it with new captures, information, etc from time to time since the journey and knowledge gained never ends. Even though it was originally posted in May of 2023, it is still very much relevant. I have gained a lot of knowledge since I...
ipcamtalk.com
I also have cameras to capture license plates. This is what they see pretty much all of the time, unless a car drives down the road and the plate is captured. I don't even have them on my monitor because their FOV is useless for anything else but plate captures.
