alastairstevenson
Staff member
100% SOLID COPPER CORE 0.51mm - data speed (10/100/1000mb),RoHS Compliant, TIA/EIA 568B Standard, Fluke tested - professional quality for High Definition (HD) camera's. Constructed from high quality weatherproof (protected against, water, heat and cold) PE jacket and UV resistant for long life and durability.
So you are saying this is a lie?
As advised, you need to search for 'solid copper' as part of the description.I genuinely found it very difficult to find a genuine 10M Cat6 or Cat5E solid copper cable
Cat6 for cameras is overkill given that cameras operate at 100Mbps link speed - Cat5e will also handle Gigabit link speed, though strictly not certified for that.
This is Cat5e solid copper, decently priced, pre-made so just spool up any excess : Cable Sourcing - 30m CAT5e, 100% SOLID COPPER CORE: Amazon.co.uk: Electronics
*edit* Just noticed it's now twice the price it was when I bought some a few weeks back, so not so decently priced ...
Absolutely no shortage of choice on Amazon.co.uk for bulk and pre-made when searching for cat5e solid copper
I've always thought that using CCA when carrying power was dumb. I ran the numbers, and they say I'm wrong.
Assuming a 200' run to the camera, with 24 awg copper having a resistance of 25.67 ohms per 1000', and 24 awg aluminum having a resistance of 42.1 ohms per 1000'. There's 400' of wire to complete the round-trip circuit, and each side of the supply is carried on 2 wires, so the total circuit resistance for the 200' run is 5.1 ohms for copper and 8.1 ohms for aluminum. With a 10 watt load the current is about 0.2 amps. With the copper wire the voltage drop is 1.02 volts and 0.2 watts is lost in the wiring. With aluminum the voltage drop is 1.62 volts and the power lost in the wiring is 0.32 watts. I'm surprised by the small difference. Did I make a math error?
The math says using CCA is perfectly ok. I still say it's dumb. For me at least the work of running the cable far overshadows the cost. I use only solid copper cat6, not for the greater data capability, but to get 23 awg instead of 24 awg.