Guys, please.
I made test in extreme low light to show difference between old sensors and new one. This is the best way to show sensitivity.
Of course manufacturers are using marketing key words and bait names to get attention. But professional installers know that every camera, even ultra low light, needs a light source.
This camera will see NOTHING in complete darkness, but this isn't a purpose of it. It is tomshow color image in minimal illustration or some image in b/w.
Take for example city surveillance. There is enough light for this camera to provide color image, because we sensor is more sensitive you can increase shutter speed to get also licence plates, details of people etc. and still have color image.
Casinos, strip clubs, restaurants - you have minimal, romantic lighting, standard camera is working in b/w providing less details, this one will give you color and better detail.
We gonna install those in one project of private lake, because there are thieves that steal fishes from it. Thermal camera is to expensive, but this one will provide info about movement during night. We don't need face, we just need signal that there is someone on lake. We can't use standard IR because area is too big.
Airports, there is light all the time. But with this camera we can increase shutter even further and get even more details.
And so on.
Not all systems are "back yard".
Will this be better that camera with IR for your home surveillance? I doubt it.
Will it better with flood light connected with motion detector - hell yeah.
Camera is a tool. You have to use right tool for given job. That's it
Wysłane z mojego SM-G935F przy użyciu Tapatalka