user8963
Known around here
Now, maybe we can get back to our regular scheduled program.....![]()
yes lets go brandon !! i already forgot about brandon :O
Now, maybe we can get back to our regular scheduled program.....![]()
Pointing out biden's faults will never stopNow, maybe we can get back to our regular scheduled program.....![]()
Somebody please explain to me what the heck the state line has anything to do with the case.Absolutely. Regardless of political affiliation or why he was there that night (and a lot of folks conveniently ignore that he lived relatively close by, even if it was across state lines), it was clear self defense.
As it turns out, it had nothing to do with case. He never crossed State lines with his long gun, ie going from one State where it is legal to another State where it is not. He got the gun in Wisconson.Somebody please explain to me what the heck the state line has anything to do with the case.
That fat fuck like the rest of them did not watch a second of the trialLittle Jerry Nadler is a certified fuckwit. His dog won’t even play with him. He never outgrew adolescence and whines like a little girl.
And more BS is starting instigated by our estimable elected representatives in Congress -
![]()
Alert: Rittenhouse 'Not Guilty' Verdict to Be Overturned? Jerry Nadler Sets Stage
House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler claims that the "dangerous precedent" set by the Rittenhouse verdict justifies a review by the DOJ.www.westernjournal.com
Damn straight!
That is the very reason it should have never made it to trial.
I’m right there with you.
I think the prosecutor was given a case he knew he couldn't win on the merits. Any 2nd year high schooler should have figured that out. I think he then tried everything to get a conviction. Including outright lying to the jury, saying things not supported by any evidence, putting folks on the stand that couldn't and didn't support his opening statements. Then he tried to get it tossed by mistrial near the end. I think the judge knew this and didn't call it as he figured they would acquit, and if not, gave a phenomenal reason for an appeal.5. I seriously wonder if the Prosecutor purposely smurfed up the trial. Could he really have been THAT incompetent? I wonder if he was pissed that he was forced to try this case knowing it was 100% political and he had no evidence that could refute self defense? May be he secretly WANTED Kyle to win? I mean just look at all of the blunders he made?
If that’s the case, then shame on the prosecutor. Potentially ruining the life of a good 18 year old kid, just to make his boss happy and a political statement.I think the prosecutor was given a case he knew he couldn't win on the merits. Any 2nd year high schooler should have figured that out. I think he then tried everything to get a conviction. Including outright lying to the jury, saying things not supported by any evidence, putting folks on the stand that couldn't and didn't support his opening statements. Then he tried to get it tossed by mistrial near the end. I think the judge knew this and didn't call it as he figured they would acquit, and if not, gave a phenomenal reason for an appeal.
If that’s the case, then shame on the prosecutor. Potentially ruining the life of a good 18 year old kid, just to make his boss happy and a political statement.
Exactly! Now Kyle needs to join the ranks of Nicolas Sandman and sue the MSM media and add Biden to that list for calling him a white supremacist.Agreed. This was purely a political trial, nothing else. Now if Kyle had been Black, charges would have never brought by the DA.
I'm convinced that this is the case for 90% of the population that is very liberal. They accuse you of being a blind Trump follower and main lining Fox News. When they do exactly that with CNN/NBC/MSM. But, most conservatives I know actually do analyze the available information, and most don't watch TV news at all.I had a conversation with a 28 year old daughter of friends of ours this evening. Her take was that he murdered two people.
My first question to her was “are you relying on headlines or did you watch any of the trial, including the prosecution star witness saying he advanced on Rittenhouse with a loaded gun and also any of the video”. Her response was typical of the uninformed “I looked at the headlines and assumed they were true”. My suggestion to her was to get her information from multiple sources and then form an informed opinion.