Neat explanation of H.265 encoding difference....

Dec 6, 2014
4,113
17,060
South Dakota
This was among pics of a Hikvision camera on Amazon... thought it was a great graphic showing how H.265 saves bandwidth in the way it compresses video.

1612455175539.png
 
That’s pretty cool. I’ve often wondered what the difference was and the efficiency differences between the two.
I realize this is probably a newbie question, but does BI allow use of H265 while using the Intel hardware accelerated decode option under Settings/Cameras? I thought I read that did not work under the wiki section, but perhaps I need to go back and reread.
 
Disregard my previous post. I found my mistake after research. Per the wiki “If your CPU supports Intel® Quick Sync Video, then you can use hardware acceleration in Blue Iris to reduce CPU and energy usage significantly with any camera streaming H.264. If your Intel CPU is 6th-generation (such as i5-6500) or newer, then you can use hardware acceleration for H.265 streams as well since around mid-April 2020 (beginning Blue Iris 5.2.5 or so).”
I don’t believe it will work for my PC as my cpu is an i5-4590. Guess it’s time for an upgrade.:)
 
H265 can use less memory and some CPUs allow intel HA for H265 - 6th generation and above support it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: srvfan
You can still use substreams and that reduces the CPU load tremendously, much more than hardware accel at that point. Mine doesn't support H265 HA, yet a lot of my cameras are running H265 and my CPU is low
 
Since I began utilizing sub streams, my CPU has dropped tremendously. I think with 9 cameras running, I average about roughly 23%. I’m still using h264, but I think I will begin playing with turning HA off and converting them to H265 with sub streams. Maybe a project for the weekend lol.
 
Be careful of some variants of h.264 and h.265 The + Plus version of these protocols is non standard and is not supported by BI or the Intel processors.

I run 14 cameras, with substream, plus 10 clone cameras in BI at about 12 FPS, 700 MP/s with H.264 on an I7-4790 at under 20% CPU.

If you look at the pictures in the example, there is a lot of constant color, this allows for good compression. I did a test on a 2MP camera without HA in BI, at both h.264 and h.265, I used a multi colored board that was moving, there was less than 10% difference in recorded file size. A lot of motion and changing colors will not compress very easily.
 
^So true - some of my cameras made almost no difference between H265 and H264, so I went back to H264 as the image appeared to me as slightly better and the memory usage was within a minute difference between the two formats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sebastiantombs