I don't think it works that way, unfortunately, check the help doc on SSS:
- "By camera" offloads the detection algorithm to the camera, saving the NAS cpu
- The "keep original camera settings" tells SSS to use the detection area configured in the camera, that's it. At least this is what SSS help says.
This doesn't mean the video stream is sent to SSS only when motion is detected by the camera: I see a constant 2-3Mb/s traffic from the cam to the nas, 24h/24h, even when there are no motion events.
Deductively, we can say that the stream is continuous, and when the camera detects motion, it tells SSS to record the stream.
I don't know how much CPU is used by the detection algorithm, but if I had a powerful synology, I would do everything on NAS, since the stream is sent anyway and it's easier configuring things on SSS than via Batch Config.
In my case, the NAS is not one of the most powerful ones (DS1812+) and it also acts as a server for Docker, mySQL, and other services I need. So I let the camera manage the detection.
If I find out that the CPU usage of the algorithm is negligible, I might switch everything to SSS.
Let me know if you experience the same behavior on your camera/SSS setup.
View attachment 61526