Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?


Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a trial lawyer who has gathered all the evidence from 100 scientists that the covid pandemic is the worst crime against humanity ever committed. He is working with 1000 lawyers worldwide to sue all who are complicit in this crime against humanity. They are preparing a second Nuremberg trial.
They have evidence the PCR test is a fraud, unable to detect a virus. Also the lockdowns have no scientific basis.
 
From the article,

according to the Times, although officials with the FDA have concluded that the benefits in preventing severe disease or death from COVID-19 still strongly outweigh the risk.1

This is going to surely raise some ethical concern. Viruses have come and gone overtime, the human body itself consists of viruses. Shares a bond. There has been a lot of inconsistency in the reporting of this pandemic and lets put this by simply saying that a vaccine dose is not the cure. The fact is human cooperation is the cure and if people were a lot more serious when cases started emerging in China (i.e. imposing travel restrictions), and if people were more serious even during the initial lockdowns (these lockdowns could have been averted if travel restrictions were in place from the get-go), perhaps it would have been a very different reality today.

J&J vaccine assocated with guillain-barré syndrome


Lets vaccinate the kids with the untested vaccinate
 
From the article,



This is going to surely raise some ethical concern. Viruses have come and gone overtime, the human body itself consists of viruses. Shares a bond. There has been a lot of inconsistency in the reporting of this pandemic and lets put this by simply saying that a vaccine dose is not the cure. The fact is human cooperation is the cure and if people were a lot more serious when cases started emerging in China (i.e. imposing travel restrictions), and if people were more serious even during the initial lockdowns (these lockdowns could have been averted if travel restrictions were in place from the get-go), perhaps it would have been a very different reality today.
I still say, once known the risk was much higher on the elderly population and those with risky underlining conditions, they should of been the focus and better protected, not like in New York...The Assist Living/Memory Care place where my Mom lived for 3 years did a lockdown, No One in except for Hospice care workers allowed. They did not have One single case of Covid. This was a sizable facility too...
 

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a trial lawyer who has gathered all the evidence from 100 scientists that the covid pandemic is the worst crime against humanity ever committed. He is working with 1000 lawyers worldwide to sue all who are complicit in this crime against humanity. They are preparing a second Nuremberg trial.
They have evidence the PCR test is a fraud, unable to detect a virus. Also the lockdowns have no scientific basis.
Is this the best link for sending money LOL :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:. Help us fight for the freedom of humanity! - Stop World Control
 
Last edited:

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a trial lawyer who has gathered all the evidence from 100 scientists that the covid pandemic is the worst crime against humanity ever committed. He is working with 1000 lawyers worldwide to sue all who are complicit in this crime against humanity. They are preparing a second Nuremberg trial.
They have evidence the PCR test is a fraud, unable to detect a virus. Also the lockdowns have no scientific basis.
One thing he states... "this is worse than what happened in WWII". This is worse than assembly lining millions of one particular race of people to gas chambers and ovens?
 
One thing he states... "this is worse than what happened in WWII". This is worse than assembly lining millions of one particular race of people to gas chambers and ovens?
We still do not know the long-term effects of these injections. This will only be known with time. Perhaps they know more than do we.
 
although officials with the FDA have concluded that the benefits in preventing severe disease or death from COVID-19 still strongly outweigh the risk.1

Easy to say that with confidence when you're shielded from any liability. I see they're no longer saying that the shot is 100% at preventing death from covid.
 
although officials with the FDA have concluded that the benefits in preventing severe disease or death from COVID-19 still strongly outweigh the risk.1

Easy to say that with confidence when you're shielded from any liability. I see they're no longer saying that the shot is 100% at preventing death from covid.

noone said that, ever. 95% effective at preventing infections has always been the claim for the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines. and the most recent numbers show, that even those 5% infections are significantly less serious, far fewer hospitalizations, and hardly no deaths statistically, compared with the unvaccinated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arjun
noone said that, ever. 95% effective at preventing infections has always been the claim for the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines. and the most recent numbers show, that even those 5% infections are significantly less serious, far fewer hospitalizations, and hardly no deaths statistically, compared with the unvaccinated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ssayer
VAERS data is unfiltered public reporting. its like a wiki or a blog, ANYONE can submit anything on there they want. the data is not checked or confirmed at the VAERS database level. "My neighbor's 2nd cousin got vaccinated, and their dog died the next week. THE VACCINE KILLED THEIR DOG!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oceanslider
noone said that, ever.
The vaccines were all 100% effective in the vaccine trials in stopping hospitalizations and death.
Take whatever COVID vaccine you can get. All of them stop death and hospitalization.

COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca confirms 100% protection against severe disease, hospitalisation and death in the primary analysis of Phase III trials
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca confirms 100% protection against severe disease, hospitalisation and death in the primary analysis of Phase III trials

The Johnson & Johnson vaccine is 85% effective at preventing severe illness, and most importantly, it was 100% effective at preventing hospitalization and death among trial participants.
An epidemiologist breaks down the numbers on Johnson & Johnson’s single-dose vaccine

The vaccines were all 100% effective in the vaccine trials in stopping hospitalizations and death.
The Differences Between the Vaccines Matter

No one who was vaccinated died of COVID-19.
The COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective. Here’s what the numbers really mean.

complete prevention of hospitalization and death related to SARS-CoV-2.
the Johnson & Johnson vaccine does seem to prevent, after 28 days, 100% of hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19.
The Johnson & Johnson Vaccine's Differences Are Pros, Not Cons | HealthCity

The vaccine was 85% effective in preventing severe COVID-19 disease and 100% effective in preventing COVID-19-related hospitalizations and deaths.
J&J vaccine shown to prevent 85% of severe COVID-19 disease

US trial finds AstraZeneca vaccine 100% effective against COVID death
US trial finds AstraZeneca vaccine 100% effective against COVID death

It was also 100% effective at preventing deaths.
COVID vaccines work well against the Delta variant, study shows