Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?
- Thread starter erkme73
- Start date
This one wasn't the one to be concerned about. The next big one is yet to come
But that can be averted. Just do your part on November 8, 2022 
I bet most of us that got the mRNA vaccines also contained saline-only.
The vaccines were not meant to offer permanent protection. Even if some of us did get the actual "thing" a good chance it has already exited and/or ran out of fuel in the immune systems and no longer poses an extended threat. The circulating antibodies were only supposed to be present for up to 6 months maximum. No more shots nor boosters.
The vaccines were not meant to offer permanent protection. Even if some of us did get the actual "thing" a good chance it has already exited and/or ran out of fuel in the immune systems and no longer poses an extended threat. The circulating antibodies were only supposed to be present for up to 6 months maximum. No more shots nor boosters.
sebastiantombs
Known around here
Given the vaccine isn't effective in the first place, as a true vaccine, and that the side effects aren't fully known either, I seriously doubt we've seen all the possible effects/outcomes. It hasn't dissipated yet in terms of side effects. That will take years to fully understand.
bigredfish
Known around here
The Study
www.medrxiv.org
The Article
www.zerohedge.com
The Numbers
The review begins with a statement of fact that was almost entirely ignored by lockdown “experts” throughout the pandemic, but especially when restrictions, lockdowns and mandates were at their peak early on.
“The infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 among non-elderly people in the absence of vaccination or prior infection is important to estimate accurately, since 94 percent of the global population is younger than 70 years and 86 percent is younger than 60 years.” [Emphasis added.]
94 percent of the global population is younger than 70 years old.
6 percent of is older than 70 years old.
86 percent is younger than 60 years old.
This is relevant because restrictions overwhelmingly impacted the 86–94 percent of people who are younger than 60 or 70 years old.
Ioannidis and his co-writers reviewed 40 national seroprevalence studies that covered 38 countries to come to determine their estimates of infection fatality rate for the overwhelming majority of people.
Importantly, those seroprevalence studies were conducted before the vaccines were released, meaning the IFR’s were calculated before whatever impact vaccines had on younger age groups.
So what did they find?
The median infection fatality rate for those aged 0–59 was 0.035 percent.
This represents 86 percent of the global population and the survival rate for those who were infected with COVID pre-vaccination was 99.965 percent.
For those aged 0–69, which covers 94 percent of the global population, the fatality rate was 0.095 percent, meaning the survival rate for nearly 7.3 billion people was 99.905 percent.
Those survival rates are obviously staggeringly high, which already creates frustration that restrictions were imposed on all age groups, when focused protection for those over 70 or at significantly elevated risk would have been a much more preferable course of action.
But it gets worse.
The researchers broke down the demographics into smaller buckets, showing the increase in risk amongst older populations, and conversely, how infinitesimal the risk was amongst younger age groups.
These numbers are astounding and reassuringly low, across the board.
But they’re almost nonexistent for children.
Yet as late as fall 2021, Fauci was still fear-mongering about the risks of COVID to children in order to increase vaccination uptake, saying in an interview that it was not a “benign situation”:
“We certainly want to get as many children vaccinated within this age group as we possibly can because as you heard and reported, that this is not, you know, a benign situation.”
It’s nearly impossible for any illness to be less of a risk, or more “benign” than a 0.0003 percent risk of death.
Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly informed from pre-vaccination national seroprevalence studies
The infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 among non-elderly people in the absence of vaccination or prior infection is important to estimate accurately, since 94% of the global population is younger than 70 years and 86% is younger than 60 years. In systematic searches in SeroTracker and...
www.medrxiv.org
The Article
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
The Numbers
The review begins with a statement of fact that was almost entirely ignored by lockdown “experts” throughout the pandemic, but especially when restrictions, lockdowns and mandates were at their peak early on.
“The infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 among non-elderly people in the absence of vaccination or prior infection is important to estimate accurately, since 94 percent of the global population is younger than 70 years and 86 percent is younger than 60 years.” [Emphasis added.]
94 percent of the global population is younger than 70 years old.
6 percent of is older than 70 years old.
86 percent is younger than 60 years old.
This is relevant because restrictions overwhelmingly impacted the 86–94 percent of people who are younger than 60 or 70 years old.
Ioannidis and his co-writers reviewed 40 national seroprevalence studies that covered 38 countries to come to determine their estimates of infection fatality rate for the overwhelming majority of people.
Importantly, those seroprevalence studies were conducted before the vaccines were released, meaning the IFR’s were calculated before whatever impact vaccines had on younger age groups.
So what did they find?
The median infection fatality rate for those aged 0–59 was 0.035 percent.
This represents 86 percent of the global population and the survival rate for those who were infected with COVID pre-vaccination was 99.965 percent.
For those aged 0–69, which covers 94 percent of the global population, the fatality rate was 0.095 percent, meaning the survival rate for nearly 7.3 billion people was 99.905 percent.
Those survival rates are obviously staggeringly high, which already creates frustration that restrictions were imposed on all age groups, when focused protection for those over 70 or at significantly elevated risk would have been a much more preferable course of action.
But it gets worse.
The researchers broke down the demographics into smaller buckets, showing the increase in risk amongst older populations, and conversely, how infinitesimal the risk was amongst younger age groups.
- Ages 60–69, fatality rate 0.501 percent, survival rate 99.499 percent
- Ages 50–59, fatality rate 0.129 percent, survival rate 99.871 percent
- Ages 40–49, fatality rate 0.035 percent survival rate 99.965 percent
- Ages 30–39, fatality rate 0.011 percent, survival rate 99.989 percent
- Ages 20–29, fatality rate 0.003 percent, survival rate 99.997 percent
- Ages 0–19, fatality rate 0.0003 percent, survival rate 99.9997 percent
These numbers are astounding and reassuringly low, across the board.
But they’re almost nonexistent for children.
Yet as late as fall 2021, Fauci was still fear-mongering about the risks of COVID to children in order to increase vaccination uptake, saying in an interview that it was not a “benign situation”:
“We certainly want to get as many children vaccinated within this age group as we possibly can because as you heard and reported, that this is not, you know, a benign situation.”
It’s nearly impossible for any illness to be less of a risk, or more “benign” than a 0.0003 percent risk of death.
We have enough problems with these covid shots, now they are gonna poison our food supply? Beef and milk?
Nearly 2 in 10 Cows Injected With mRNA “Vaccine” DIE Almost Instantly
Nearly 2 in 10 Cows Injected With mRNA “Vaccine” DIE Almost Instantly
Gargoile
Getting comfortable
WOW they really, really, really don't want us to eat meat now. If you won't take the jab, governments will make sure you get the vaccine by any means possible.
Sybertiger
Known around here
Who has the best evidence that Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine are effective against Covid-19. If you don't mind reposting the best article or evidence. I'd like to email the info to a friend. Thx.
bigredfish
Known around here
FLCCC recommends it as part of a protocol. Vit D and others should not be ignored.
covid19criticalcare.com
covid19criticalcare.com
covid19criticalcare.com
Note that it seems from my readings (I’m not a doctor and this is not medical advice. Merely my opinion) to work best as a prophylactic as well as the early days (1-3) after symptoms show. Once Covid gains a foothold then not as much. It acts to help cells prevent the WuFlu from getting in. Once it gets in a large percentage of cells, the efficacy is diminished.
Ivermectin
What is Ivermectin? Ivermectin is one of the most common medicines used to treat a variety of illnesses. What more can this wonder drug do?
covid19criticalcare.com
I-PREVENT: COVID, Flu and RSV
I-PREVENT is the prevention protocol for COVID, FLU, and RSV, developed by The FLCCC Alliance using effective and widely available medicines.
covid19criticalcare.com
I-CARE: Early COVID Treatment
I-CARE is a protocol focused on the early treatment of COVID-19, developed by the medical experts in The FLCCC Alliance.
covid19criticalcare.com
Note that it seems from my readings (I’m not a doctor and this is not medical advice. Merely my opinion) to work best as a prophylactic as well as the early days (1-3) after symptoms show. Once Covid gains a foothold then not as much. It acts to help cells prevent the WuFlu from getting in. Once it gets in a large percentage of cells, the efficacy is diminished.
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
The effect of ivermectin on the viral load and culture viability in early treatment of nonhospitalized patients with mild COVID-19 – a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial
Search of: Ivermectin | COVID-19 - List Results - ClinicalTrials.gov
The guy who is credited for inventing mRNA technology
Ivermectin: Why is the Administrative State willing to kill you?
Again IMHO (not medical advice), the argument is not just about Ivermectin.HCQ as a therapy
Its
1- The jabs dont work well
2- The jabs clearly dont prevent the disease or its transmission.
3- The Jabs very likely harm a large number of people and in any other circumstance, would not have been authorized
4- Since a majority (60%>+) of the worlds population has been jabbed (Fall of 2021), deaths have skyrocketed and exceeded the number before Jabs
5- The guy who invented the technology of the mRNA jab is against it
6-IVM and HCQ have been shown (along with other drugs and supplements) to help as a prophylactic and in early stages (1-3 days)
7- Paxlovid (Pfizermectin) is showing promising results but still early as far as data
Search of: Ivermectin | COVID-19 - List Results - ClinicalTrials.gov
The guy who is credited for inventing mRNA technology
Ivermectin: Why is the Administrative State willing to kill you?
Again IMHO (not medical advice), the argument is not just about Ivermectin.HCQ as a therapy
Its
1- The jabs dont work well
2- The jabs clearly dont prevent the disease or its transmission.
3- The Jabs very likely harm a large number of people and in any other circumstance, would not have been authorized
4- Since a majority (60%>+) of the worlds population has been jabbed (Fall of 2021), deaths have skyrocketed and exceeded the number before Jabs
5- The guy who invented the technology of the mRNA jab is against it
6-IVM and HCQ have been shown (along with other drugs and supplements) to help as a prophylactic and in early stages (1-3 days)
7- Paxlovid (Pfizermectin) is showing promising results but still early as far as data
Oceanslider
Known around here
And to top it off the Science we are supposed to "believe" created the virus.
bigredfish
Known around here
Thats it. I figure I have somewhere between 10-17 years left on this rock if Im lucky.
With just 14 months to go for Medicare, we're starting to look for some property in the country. These crazy fucks aren't going to be happy until they kill off a large chunk of the population
How Is This Legal? Scientists In London Lab Just Created A Mutant Super Strain of COVID And It’s Reportedly Lethal
How Is This Legal? Scientists In London Lab Just Created A Mutant Super Strain of COVID And It's Reportedly Lethal
Playing With Fire: A Lab-Made Frankenstein COVID-19 Virus By Boston University
Playing With Fire: A Lab-Made Frankenstein COVID-19 Virus By Boston University | ZeroHedge
With just 14 months to go for Medicare, we're starting to look for some property in the country. These crazy fucks aren't going to be happy until they kill off a large chunk of the population
How Is This Legal? Scientists In London Lab Just Created A Mutant Super Strain of COVID And It’s Reportedly Lethal
How Is This Legal? Scientists In London Lab Just Created A Mutant Super Strain of COVID And It's Reportedly Lethal
Playing With Fire: A Lab-Made Frankenstein COVID-19 Virus By Boston University
Playing With Fire: A Lab-Made Frankenstein COVID-19 Virus By Boston University | ZeroHedge
bigredfish
Known around here
Ooooopppppssss
Fully Vaxxed and Boosted CDC Director Walensky Tests Positive For Covid AGAIN in Rebound Case After Taking Paxlovid
Fully Vaxxed and Boosted CDC Director Walensky Tests Positive For Covid AGAIN in Rebound Case After Taking Paxlovid
So are they gonna put her on Remdisivir and a ventilator like they did to kill hundreds of thousands? Asking for a friend..
Fully Vaxxed and Boosted CDC Director Walensky Tests Positive For Covid AGAIN in Rebound Case After Taking Paxlovid
Fully Vaxxed and Boosted CDC Director Walensky Tests Positive For Covid AGAIN in Rebound Case After Taking Paxlovid
So are they gonna put her on Remdisivir and a ventilator like they did to kill hundreds of thousands? Asking for a friend..
bigredfish
Known around here
Two Studies from Columbia and Harvard Reveal New Omicron Boosters Were Just as Ineffective as Previous Covid Shots – FDA Says Study Too Small to Come to Any Conclusions
Two Studies from Columbia and Harvard Reveal New Omicron Boosters Were Just as Ineffective as Previous Covid Shots - FDA Says Study Too Small to Come to Any Conclusions
Two Studies from Columbia and Harvard Reveal New Omicron Boosters Were Just as Ineffective as Previous Covid Shots - FDA Says Study Too Small to Come to Any Conclusions
Gargoile
Getting comfortable
Ever since the 90's the elite have been saying we have too many people on this earth and they were thinking of ways to thin the heard. I guess Rona is one of them (not called out specifically) , the other is famine, and the later is water. Why do you think Gates started the seed bank.
Sybertiger
Known around here
Not a Joke: COVID Lockdowners Want a 'Pandemic Amnesty' for What They Did and Said
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), said she agrees with calls for a "pandemic amnesty" in which people need to forgive and forget the actions taken by public officials during the height of COVID.
thepoliticalinsider.com