Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Yep, definitely cats, or climate change, or some other such thing...
Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?
- Thread starter erkme73
- Start date
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
As good a place as any...
nypost.com
80% of Americans test positive for chemical found in Cheerios, Quaker Oats that may cause infertility, delayed puberty: study
The Environmental Working Group published a study that said four out of five Americans are being exposed to a little-known chemical found in popular oat-based foods linked to reduced fertility.
nypost.com
I came across this site, hadn't heard of it before. I wonder if the wife would mind if I joined? How do you know if someone is unvaccinated?
World's First Covid-19 Unvaccinated Platform
Unvacccinated dating, friendships and community. Build a profile and get connecting with other likeminded, unvaccinated humans around the world.
unjected.com
bigredfish
Known around here
Yeah Im thinking Mrs Bigredfish wouldnt understand 
bigredfish
Known around here
bigredfish
Known around here
"License To Play God": Physician Group Files Brief Against Biden In COVID
"License To Play God": Physician Group Files Brief Against Biden In COVID | ZeroHedge
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed an amicus brief against the Biden administration in a Supreme Court case, criticizing the government’s online censorship of COVID-19 information.
The lawsuit, Murthy v. Missouri, alleges that the administration engaged in coercing social media platforms to suppress COVID-19 content.
The American Medical Association (AMA) and other groups filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court supporting the Biden administration.
In its brief, AMA and its allies said that the federal government had a “compelling interest” in the case. They justified censorship by arguing that “combatting vaccine misinformation is, at its simplest, the government trying to prevent factually incorrect statements from costing people their lives.”
The AAPS filed its brief on Feb. 7, slamming AMA’s position.
“Our national motto is not ‘In Vaccines We Trust’, or even ‘In Government We Trust.’ The right to criticize vaccines and government mandates of vaccines should not be abridged” as sought after by the AMA and “other allies of the Biden Administration,” the brief said.
“Freedom to criticize is an essential safeguard against tyranny, and a First Amendment right … It is alarming that any professional organization would argue for censorship as the AMA Amici do in this case.”
The AMA amicus brief is supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Physicians, and the American Geriatrics Society.
“The argument by the AMA Amici to declare a compelling interest in vaccination such that censorship of it would be allowed should be firmly rejected here,” AAPS said in its brief. For more than 50 years, there have not been any new categories of unprotected speech, it said.
“Criticism of vaccination is warranted in response to the exaggerations of benefits of vaccination and the denial of its proven harms, as illustrated by the AMA Amici brief here. “A sharp decline in the prevalence of diseases cited by the AMA Amici began before the relevant vaccine became commonly used, thereby disproving the asserted cause-and-effect.”
The AMA brief also fails to reference the “immense harm” caused by several novel or contaminated vaccines, like the first polio shots, AAPS stated.
Allowing the federal government to censor vaccine criticism will open the doorway to “an unaccountable license to play God in tinkering with human biology.”
AAPS warned that by seeking to censor criticism of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, the AMA brief signers “implicitly seek censorship of criticism of anything that may be called a vaccine in the future under yet another redefinition of that term.”
"License To Play God": Physician Group Files Brief Against Biden In COVID | ZeroHedge
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed an amicus brief against the Biden administration in a Supreme Court case, criticizing the government’s online censorship of COVID-19 information.
The lawsuit, Murthy v. Missouri, alleges that the administration engaged in coercing social media platforms to suppress COVID-19 content.
The American Medical Association (AMA) and other groups filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court supporting the Biden administration.
In its brief, AMA and its allies said that the federal government had a “compelling interest” in the case. They justified censorship by arguing that “combatting vaccine misinformation is, at its simplest, the government trying to prevent factually incorrect statements from costing people their lives.”
The AAPS filed its brief on Feb. 7, slamming AMA’s position.
“Our national motto is not ‘In Vaccines We Trust’, or even ‘In Government We Trust.’ The right to criticize vaccines and government mandates of vaccines should not be abridged” as sought after by the AMA and “other allies of the Biden Administration,” the brief said.
“Freedom to criticize is an essential safeguard against tyranny, and a First Amendment right … It is alarming that any professional organization would argue for censorship as the AMA Amici do in this case.”
The AMA amicus brief is supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Physicians, and the American Geriatrics Society.
“The argument by the AMA Amici to declare a compelling interest in vaccination such that censorship of it would be allowed should be firmly rejected here,” AAPS said in its brief. For more than 50 years, there have not been any new categories of unprotected speech, it said.
“Criticism of vaccination is warranted in response to the exaggerations of benefits of vaccination and the denial of its proven harms, as illustrated by the AMA Amici brief here. “A sharp decline in the prevalence of diseases cited by the AMA Amici began before the relevant vaccine became commonly used, thereby disproving the asserted cause-and-effect.”
The AMA brief also fails to reference the “immense harm” caused by several novel or contaminated vaccines, like the first polio shots, AAPS stated.
Allowing the federal government to censor vaccine criticism will open the doorway to “an unaccountable license to play God in tinkering with human biology.”
AAPS warned that by seeking to censor criticism of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, the AMA brief signers “implicitly seek censorship of criticism of anything that may be called a vaccine in the future under yet another redefinition of that term.”
Last edited:
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Oceanslider
Known around here
the Google nazi's are restricting this to view on YouTube only and probably heavily restricted popping up in a feed.
Dr. Campbell and the white blood clotting... (lots of images)
Dr. Campbell and the white blood clotting... (lots of images)
Last edited:
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
The new boosters are fine though, right?
bigredfish
Known around here
#5 was ok, stay away from #6, and 7-8 get you the free toaster!
Damn, if only they had been wearing those masks this wouldn't have happened. And what about those MMR vaccines?
www.foxnews.com
Florida elementary school confirms 6th case of measles amid outbreak
Health officials at Florida's Department of Health and officials at Broward County Public Schools have confirmed a sixth measles case at Manatee Bay Elementary School in Weston.
www.foxnews.com