Review: EmpireTech IPC-T58IR-ZE-S3 / Dahua 5842T-ZE-S3 - 8MP / 4K Turret Camera

I’ll also be showing the 4MP version in a week or 2. Stay tuned though for a new 4K video as part of the challenge that was set me.
 
XI's are really good, I have one and love it BUT it is currently trailing behind the EI from an AcuPick 2.0 perspective. I have however addressed this with Dahua and asked that they release a new FW version ASAP for XI that looks to get to feature parity with EI, especially from an AcuPick perspective. This is needed, especially when Dahua themselves call out the XI in the AcuPick 2.0 press. XI is phenomenal WRT on NVR processing, especially from AI by recorder ANPR. EI is surprisingly good for the market its aimed at for sure and certainly a great value for money but it is lacking in certain on NVR AI areas. With that said, AcuPick 2.0 and specifically Map Tracks is very nice to see.

I plan on doing a deep dive for people here on EI vs XI, AcuPick vs VMD etc but at the moment am focused on an LPR challenge that was set (should have that up in the next day or 2) + the bug documentation for Dahua.
Yeah I can see the difference in the AI features as I throw Metadata and Face recognition on basic 2000 series cameras and it works (albeit faces not as good as the 5000 series and was only for testing purposes). And its not as limited as with the EI. But I definitely have more customers picking the EI due to the price.

I wish the XI had Acupick in the web service since for my customers those are rack mounted locked away in IT rooms with no local access to them. Its not something the customer will stick on his office desk. So I havent been able to test the Acupick on that yet.

The only other issue I see with the XI is as I use it over p2p like i do other units (due to the client's IT restrictions/time to open ports etc), it keeps asking to reinstall the webservice. It seems this webservice is based on the IP or ports. And even when the webservice is installed it will also say Plugin Not Compatible, and then load the video. Not sure if thats a bug Dahua know about or not.

Separately, the way the 5000 series Metadata shows the plates, it would be nice to be able to search for that plate. But that seems to be saved in the camera right, therefore requiring the LPR camera?

And another thing I always wondered, why we cant search for the name of a person in the face search.
I name the staff in the database for example but when I do a search it does not find anything.
However the face alerts shows the name.
I must say Face Recognition has improved 100% since i first tested it on the Lite AI NVR back in 2020.
At 80% its giving me faces I can barely recognize myself but somehow it sees the similarity.
DMSS people alerts is great too, although IMO the app itself needs alot of work (crashing all the time for me).
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
Yep and as mentioned, shame the Plate No. while clearly captured (in stream on cam as I showed before) as a plate is not processed on the NVR, instead showing Plate Unknown. Therefore you end up with LPR/NPR, not ALPR/ANPR. With that said you CAN do that with AI By Recorder on XI's etc which makes up for some of it BUT that is why I have the bug filed both on cam and NVR as I mentioned.
Quick question about the XI as Dahua specs vary. Its basically 8 channels of AI by recorder for everything right? So 4x Face Recognition, 2 Video Metadata, 2 SMD would max it out, or is SMD not counted? On the EI when I did Face Rec on 1 channel it limited me to 4 x SMD by recorder max. As you mentioned the LPR I may want to put that on a couple cameras like the 5442 and or the 5842. I may end up doing 4x Face Rec and 4x LPR. If thats even possible. Using Metadata, Face Detect, and SMD (2000 series) by camera.
 
Quick question about the XI as Dahua specs vary. Its basically 8 channels of AI by recorder for everything right? So 4x Face Recognition, 2 Video Metadata, 2 SMD would max it out, or is SMD not counted? On the EI when I did Face Rec on 1 channel it limited me to 4 x SMD by recorder max. As you mentioned the LPR I may want to put that on a couple cameras like the 5442 and or the 5842. I may end up doing 4x Face Rec and 4x LPR. If thats even possible. Using Metadata, Face Detect, and SMD (2000 series) by camera.

No.. XI have 24 or 32 AI points (depending of model, firmware and did You use separate video for HDMI2/3/4)...

SMD/IVS is using 1 AI point, full Face Detection is using 4 AI points, Face Recognition (with Face Detection done on camera) is using 1/2 AI points, Video MetaData is using 4 AI points..
AcuPick 1.0 is using 0.5 AI points...

there is some small variability depending of firmware version and how You join different AI functions (sometimes limits are higher as declared, sometimes lower)..
 
XI's are really good, I have one and love it BUT it is currently trailing behind the EI from an AcuPick 2.0 perspective. I have however addressed this with Dahua and asked that they release a new FW version ASAP for XI that looks to get to feature parity with EI, especially from an AcuPick perspective. This is needed, especially when Dahua themselves call out the XI in the AcuPick 2.0 press. XI is phenomenal WRT on NVR processing, especially from AI by recorder ANPR. EI is surprisingly good for the market its aimed at for sure and certainly a great value for money but it is lacking in certain on NVR AI areas. With that said, AcuPick 2.0 and specifically Map Tracks is very nice to see.

I plan on doing a deep dive for people here on EI vs XI, AcuPick vs VMD etc but at the moment am focused on an LPR challenge that was set (should have that up in the next day or 2) + the bug documentation for Dahua.

I received reply from my Dahua rep for my many queries about AcuPick 2.0 firmware for XI line...
they are working on that.. no ETA.. no alpha/beta versions yet.. this is reply from China HQ...
maybe someone else will get a better result..
 
  • Like
Reactions: cctvtech
I received reply from my Dahua rep for my many queries about AcuPick 2.0 firmware for XI line...
they are working on that.. no ETA.. no alpha/beta versions yet.. this is reply from China HQ...
maybe someone else will get a better result..
Yes I’m providing feedback and some bug fixes to their dev team on implementing ASAP with a few ideas since this was targeted for July.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EMPIRETECANDY
What is the model number for the 4mp? Is it the IPC-T54IR-ZE?
 
No.. XI have 24 or 32 AI points (depending of model, firmware and did You use separate video for HDMI2/3/4)...

SMD/IVS is using 1 AI point, full Face Detection is using 4 AI points, Face Recognition (with Face Detection done on camera) is using 1/2 AI points, Video MetaData is using 4 AI points..
AcuPick 1.0 is using 0.5 AI points...

there is some small variability depending of firmware version and how You join different AI functions (sometimes limits are higher as declared, sometimes lower)..
No its not connected to a monitor yet. I only have the 1 XI as yet. Eventually may get a monitor but all they have is a 90's crt.

Also, Metadata at one of my clients using the IPC-T54IR-ZE (plan to upgrade to the 8MP to get faces and plates double the distance), averages about 1100 humans and 1500 vehicles daily, most before 12 noon. But I can see the need for the 8MP for plates and faces further away, as I have that at another location. I had the 8MP set to default and it was catching the main road about 100 feet away (zoomed in to 60), it had 70 pages in 1 hour full of vehicles from the main road, including mine, and it didnt miss most by the looks of it. Took it off the main road.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
No its not connected to a monitor yet. I only have the 1 XI as yet. Eventually may get a monitor but all they have is a 90's crt.

Also, Metadata at one of my clients using the IPC-T54IR-ZE (plan to upgrade to the 8MP to get faces and plates double the distance), averages about 1100 humans and 1500 vehicles daily, most before 12 noon. But I can see the need for the 8MP for plates and faces further away, as I have that at another location. I had the 8MP set to default and it was catching the main road about 100 feet away (zoomed in to 60), it had 70 pages in 1 hour full of vehicles from the main road, including mine, and it didnt miss most by the looks of it. Took it off the main road.
Don’t be knocking those 90’s crt’s ;)
 
The aucpick 2.0 still have some more work to do, i will check with dahua team after their national holiday, Oct.1st-7th is their holiday. People use BI or 3rd party software this function not useful.
-XI firmware as i know they are working on it, but need time to finish them, the XI is more expensive and comes out much later than the -EI products, so that is why the -EI more update.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parley
IVS is for perimeter protection - to catch humans/vehicles which entered a specific area.
Video MetaData is for building a searchable and annotated database of all the people/cars the camera sees.

It is best to test these differences on your cameras.
It is also good practice to implement both based on differing areas of your location and target requirements within those.
 
All, posting here (will add to original posts to make it easier to find in future) and will post a separate thread too on the challenge I've been alluding to.

Hope everyone had a great weekend. I wanted to post this video I took using the new S3 cams I’ve been testing. Specifically I was challenged via some forum members and YouTube viewers to push these new cameras (4K variant) to the limit and attempt to use them for LPR (NPR) recognition. To be clear this is not to be confused with Automated License / Number Plate Recognition which as I’ve shown before has to be supported by the camera through OCR processing as part of the AI algorithm. These cameras actually DO support that BUT critically this has not been implemented yet in FW (read my bug list in the main review HERE).

I’ve shown before and most people are aware that 2MP, 4MP cams at Z4 or Z12 do a good job in these kinds of situations BUT as I’ve mentioned before, light requirements, noise etc increase dramatically for 8MP/4K, making this a harder task.

So with that said, in this video I want to show you what’s possible, how you can (and MUST) tame the over-sharpening and not only demonstrate the results but share the settings I put in place when undertaking this challenge, including making it more difficult on myself. Unfortunately YouTube adds compression artifacts but I've tried to ensure those are kept to a minimum as always.

In case you're asking, YES, these do great for LPR and even ALPR (using on NVR AI, for the moment), during the day.

Hope this helps, enjoy ! Please do remember to like & subscribe to the video, it does help at least get the content promoted in the algorithm and these videos do take a LOT of time to produce.

Thanks

Do remember to select 4K for playback.

 
  1. Yes, they do support it just not implemented / purposefully disabled in current FW. Couple of ways you can see this:
    1. Throw on AcuPick as an example, go into your NVR of choice (I currently have these hooked into both EI's and XI's) go into AI Settings (on EI) or AI / Parameters on XI.
    2. Then go down to ANPR, choose the channel you have the SR camera(s) on and you will see that you can enable it for the cam (not to be confused with NVR AI processing), this is strictly reading the supported attributes of the cam itself. You won't get the 'Config is Not Supported' error that you would with a truly unsupported cam (think S1 or S2 versions that do NOT support at all).
    3. You'll notice (depending on NVR) you can enable Block List Sync etc (XI where you can set database local or remote).
  2. On the cam you can sanity check as well. Go into Picture (for captured snapshots) in the camera and you'll see the drop-down of capture types.
    1. Choose ANPR and you'll see it captures 2 (of the usual 3) pictures, wide car, close up but critically even though the camera knows it can capture ANPR, does NOT, currently show Plate due to OCR being disabled in current FW.
    2. Critically IF you go into the Record menu (for video capture) and then choose ANPR from the selection, you will see NO video is captured at all, even when the Picture / Snapshots ARE recognizing and tagging the vehicle correctly as an ANPR capture.
An additional data point that I find very interesting in my testing is that IF you have an NVR with ANPR processing via AI on it (like XI), the exact grab of the plate (again processed on NVR) matches the exact snapshot (even by time) that the S3 cam is processing for ANPR in camera (snapshot), like I said difference is that cam doesn't complete the output).

today I had an epiphany - why does 5442 have the ANPR engine (license plate OCR) partially enabled?

If you have full Video Metadata enabled - 5442 takes snapshots of the license plate. In 95% of cases (including at night) it manages to catch a sharp record of the car plate number..

To select from multiple frames of the video footage, those that have a sharp license plate - the camera must have some mini form of OCR that will determine whether this plate and letters on it is sharp or not..

That is why 5442 has ANPR partially enabled. It accepts the configuration for ANPR and behaves as if it were doing OCR of plates. They used the existing code for ANPR - they simply blocked the final phases (finishing OCR, generating an entry with the plate number).

This is intentional, the 5442 is not supposed to have full ANPR (there is 7442 for that) but they wanted to support plate snapshots for cars (similarly to face snapshots for people).
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish
To show everyone, about what we have discussion here....
this is 5442-z4 which I installed on a new site a few days ago..
it's not even fine tuned for a night image (I didn't have time for that)..

Configured to FULL Video MetaData, no AcuPick, no IVS, no SMD...
Data received by 5232-EI, but any 5xxx-4KS2 here will work the same...
Some parts of faces and plate numbers are cut/blurred by me (this is EU - we have strong privacy law here)..

Vehicles at day & night:

View attachment 204223

View attachment 204224

non motor vehicles:
View attachment 204225

humans (some with faces if they were front to camera):
View attachment 204226

Faces alone:
View attachment 204227
what software is this?