Review - IP Cam Talk 4 MP IR Fixed Turret Network Camera

looney2ns

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
15,521
Reaction score
22,657
Location
Evansville, In. USA
Courtesy of @Mike here at


We have the ipcamtalk branded 4 MP IR Fixed Turret Network Camera to check out.
I have received this camera in exchange for a fair and honest review.

Available here for approx $147.00 https://store.ipcamtalk.com/shop/ipct-hdw5431re-i/

Edit: Note that **This cam does NOT require plugins in Chrome. Not tested any other browser.**

IPCT-HDW5431RE-I
4 MP IR Fixed Turret Network Camera
  • Max. 2688× 1520 @ 30fps
  • H.265, H.264
  • 120dB WDR
  • Powered by Night Eye, enhanced night vision
  • Color: 0.007 Lux @ (F1.2, AGC ON),0.001Lux @ (F1.4, AGC ON), 0 Lux with IR
  • False alarm filter by target classification
  • 12 VDC & PoE (802.3at, class 4)
  • IR range: Up to 50 m
  • Support on-board storage, up to 128 GB
  • IP67, IK10
Camera
Image Sensor: 1/2.7” Progressive Scan CMOS
Signal System: PAL/NTSC
Min. Illumination: Color: 0.007 Lux @ (F1.2, AGC ON), 0.012 Lux @ (F1.6, AGC ON)
Shutter time: 1/3 s to 1/100,000 s
Slow shutter: Support
Lens: 2.8 mm, horizontal FOV: 104°, vertical FOV: 58°, diagonal FOV: 124°
4 mm, horizontal FOV: 83°, vertical FOV: 44°, diagonal FOV: 99°
6 mm, horizontal FOV: 51°, vertical FOV: 28°, diagonal FOV: 58°
Lens Mount: M12
Adjustment Range: Pan: 0° to 360°, tilt: 0° to 70°, rotate: 0° to 360°
Day& Night: IR cut filter with auto switch
Wide Dynamic Range: 120 dB
Digital noise reduction: 3D DNR
Focus: Fixed
Compression Standard
Video Compression: H.265/H.264/MJPEG
Video bit rate: 32Kbps~16Mbps

I have the 2.8mm version.

Complete specs here: 4 MP IR Fixed Turret Network Camera, Powered by Night Eye | IP Cam Talk

IMG_20190202_161504963.jpg
The Dahua 5231 Starlight on the left.
IMG_20190202_161637454.jpg IMG_20190202_161643284.jpg IMG_20190202_161705240.jpg IMG_20190202_161726316.jpg

Twist off trim ring to expose the set screw.
IMG_20190202_161748247.jpg IMG_20190202_161800301.jpg


Loosen set screw, pull back tab, and remove or rotate cam in it's base.
IMG_20190202_161953666.jpg IMG_20190202_161959558.jpg IMG_20190202_162050830.jpg IMG_20190202_162057717.jpg IMG_20190202_162243781.jpg IMG_20190202_162226500.jpg

Door to access reset button, Sd card slot and serial port.
IMG_20190202_162340533.jpg IMG_20190202_162531682.jpg IMG_20190202_162559054.jpg
 
Last edited:

looney2ns

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
15,521
Reaction score
22,657
Location
Evansville, In. USA
Some notes:
  • Manual says holding the reset button for 10 seconds will default the cam.
  • Nope, you have to remove power, hold down the reset button, then apply power while continuing to hold down the reset button for 30 seconds after applying power.
  • In the video below, you will see the night version of me walking up to the camera washing out my face. I will repeat that test, because I failed to realize factory default does not turn on the auto adjust for the IR illumination. Default is on manual at full power. Partly due to a learning curve for this firmware on my part.
  • After dark, the scene is illuminated by the IPCT cam's IR, 7.5watts of LED light from the lamp post on the left, and an 8 watt auxiliary IR illumination.
  • There is no "auto setting" for exposure and such, you have to set the shutter speed where you want it for day and night. Default is 1/30 at night, and 1/60 in daytime.
  • It does change the day and night profiles when it switches from night to day. As long as you have it set to auto-change.
  • At one point during the night test, I turn off both the 8 watt Ir illuminator, and the post lamp for comparison.
  • In this first video, all camera settings are at factory default. Recorded and exported from Blue Iris.
  • Be sure to choose 1080p or higher in YT player.
  • Again, I will repeat the nighttime walk test after I adjust the camera appropriately away from defaults.
 
Last edited:

pozzello

Known around here
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
1,117
2.8 mm with 1/2" sensor is about 98 degrees horizontal FoV per IPVM calculator. very wide...
If using these to replace existing 1/3" sensors, gotta factor that in...

edit: f'man corrected me below. doesn't apply to this cam (but to the 8MP 5831, yes)
 
Last edited:

fenderman

Staff member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
36,897
Reaction score
21,250
2.8 mm with 1/2" sensor is about 98 degrees horizontal FoV per IPVM calculator. very wide...
If using these to replace existing 1/3" sensors, gotta factor that in...
Incorrect. These 2mp and 4mp accusense cameras are not 1/2" they are 1/2.7 and 1/2.8, the fov will be similar to a 1/3 sensor with the same focal length.
 

pozzello

Known around here
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
1,117
Incorrect. These 2mp and 4mp accusense cameras are not 1/2" they are 1/2.7 and 1/2.8, the fov will be similar to a 1/3 sensor with the same focal length.
d'oh. thanx for clarifying that. Thought i could chip in in some info as I had one (8mp 5831) around. nm...
 

looney2ns

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
15,521
Reaction score
22,657
Location
Evansville, In. USA
I thought that was just me! lol When I got the 5631 to review, we had back to back tropical storms for weeks.... super frustrating.
Seems like 50% of the cams I review are drug out due to weather. ;)
On the bright side, this cam has survived some nasty wind blown rain so far.
 

polaris

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
58
Reaction score
27
Location
Lithuania
To me, Dahua looks way better (better image detail while having less pixels). Also, the colors are way oversaturated.

Would love to see comparison at night.
 
Last edited:

Camit

Pulling my weight
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Messages
412
Reaction score
122
The IPCT cam is still running factory defaults, and the Dahua is not. Saturation is tuned down in the Dahua. Just an on the fly capture.
Why did you turn the saturation down ..jw
 

J Sigmo

Known around here
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Messages
997
Reaction score
1,333
I know why I often turn the saturation down in photo cameras. When converting from the RAW image sensor data to a color bitmap, having the saturation set too high can easily lead to clipping of individual color channels (Red, Green, or Blue) even when the RAW data is still well below clipping.

The image from the adjusted camera looks more natural to me. Companies often set default saturation very high because it sells cameras, TVs, Monitors, etc. People tend to prefer oversaturated images upon brief inspection and comparison. Once you get to view them for a while, you realize that it needs to be turned down because the images are unrealistic and cartoonish.

Check out how the demo TVs are adjusted, or the demo video is adjusted for display TVs at most stores. They crank up the saturation for the high profit models and not so much for the lower margin units. Sneaky!
 

looney2ns

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
15,521
Reaction score
22,657
Location
Evansville, In. USA
I know why I often turn the saturation down in photo cameras. When converting from the RAW image sensor data to a color bitmap, having the saturation set too high can easily lead to clipping of individual color channels (Red, Green, or Blue) even when the RAW data is still well below clipping.

The image from the adjusted camera looks more natural to me. Companies often set default saturation very high because it sells cameras, TVs, Monitors, etc. People tend to prefer oversaturated images upon brief inspection and comparison. Once you get to view them for a while, you realize that it needs to be turned down because the images are unrealistic and cartoonish.

Check out how the demo TVs are adjusted, or the demo video is adjusted for display TVs at most stores. They crank up the saturation for the high profit models and not so much for the lower margin units. Sneaky!
Exactly! :goodpost:
Default is at 50, I run all mine at 40.

It will depend on how your monitor is adjusted that you are using to view those comparison photos too.
 
Top