That's a good idea, if you have a POE injector laying around you could try that too. I use a Ubiquity switch and have had no issues but it cost much more and is POE+ capable as well.
I didn't see the need for POE+ as I just intend to use the x1 IP camera with Synology NAS. Thus POE should be sufficient right?
I don't have a POE injector.. hopefully that power adapter via amazon is right?
With regards to PING this is what I get:
PING 192.168.0.108 (192.168.0.108): 56 data bytes
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
ping: sendto: No route to host
Request timeout for icmp_seq 4
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 5
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 6
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 7
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 8
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 9
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 10
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 11
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 12
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 13
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 14
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 15
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 16
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 17
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 18
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 19
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 20
≈≈ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 21
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 22
ping: sendto: Host is down
Request timeout for icmp_seq 23
Request timeout for icmp_seq 24
Request timeout for icmp_seq 25