...and steering us away from over-regulation, more bureaucracy, poor trade agreements and socialist-leanings.......IMO.
...and steering us away from over-regulation, more bureaucracy, poor trade agreements and socialist-leanings.......IMO.
lol...sure..that putz did nothing but screw us over...obama care, his namesake was the worst of all...Thanks Obama!
Actually - I don't believe I read that link or that you posted it. I need that 5 minutes of my life back.
Socialism is defined as "a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies."
Listening to folks throw the term “socialism” around these days is much like listening to the gun grabbers talk about “clips.”
Apparently neither completely understands what they’re talking about.
... I know it may not be the fully accurate term, but I am smart enough to know what they mean. And it is really irrelevant to the point anyway isn't it?...
...Most normal guys like us, have to work hard and enjoy life and help others if have the ability,that is it.
Haha, , the world is simple, but sometimes very complicated. USA is a great country, I will visit there soon. Our news said USA is very dangerous , full of guns and killing. Fake news, lolThanks for all that Andy. I’m going to help you by buying another camera from you real soon now.
Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear - kept us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor - with the cry of grave national emergency. - Douglas MacArthur
Socialism is defined as "a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies."
Another is "....a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole."
…democratic socialism, in which extensive state regulation, with limited state ownership, has been employed by democratically elected governments (as in Sweden and Denmark) in the belief that it produces a fair distribution of income without impairing economic growth…
I believe you actually mean “Democratic Socialism,” which is a horse of a different color, and does not necessarily entail the government owning the means of production, but rather highly regulating the means of production...