SysconciousAu,
Thanks for the thoughtful response.
That might mean they play the CCTV with the audio as is, they might play it with the volume turned to zero or it might mean they throw out the footage altogether.
I wouldn't turn over footage that contained audio. Right now, I don't know how I'd do it, but I'd strip out the audio. Maybe in a movie maker type program, when I rip the footage to a DVD to submit to authorities.
the evidence excluded if you give them the slightest opportunity. If you can't use it legally, then why do it at all?
Fair question. Several answers.
1) if I'm away from home, and see someone kick in the door (and I hear the splintering door or breaking glass), then I call 911 and send the police. No release of audio.But my system serves a purpose.
2) Having my system serves many purposes. The least is to gather video/audio evidence that could be used in a court of law.
3) If LEO wants evidence, I could supply snapshots. Printed or jpg.
4) We've all seen you tube videos of crimes in the process, with some including LEOs. Showing a way to use my system legally (if I don't post audio)
We have a pomeranian. Coyotes live in our area. I've captured footage of them 10ft from my front door, and 3ft from my back door. Sometimes 2 or 3 at a time. A pomeranian would make a nice snack. When the dog is out (daytime only when we're not an "escort"), the remote monitor in the kitchen has the speaker turned on. If the dog barks, we glance at the monitor.
In conclusion, audio boosts the value of my system (for my purposes). The above is an answer to "If you can't use it legally, then why do it at all?". And I guess I'm comfortable with the "grayness".
BTW, my pomeranian
has given his consent to be recorded.
Fastb