Scottish court: your neighbours owe you for the distress of pointing a CCTV at your back yard and recording your conversations
Govt Surveillance == Good, Private Surveillance == Bad
Anyone in US should be weary of recording Audio for these very reasons, Imagery is protected federally but not audio.. see: Bert P. Krages - Attorney at Law
Edinburgh's Nahid Akram installed a CCTV system that let him record his downstairs neighbours Debbie and Tony Woolley in their back garden, capturing both images and audio of their private conversations, with a system that had the capacity to record continuously for five days.
A Scottish court has ruled that the distress caused by their neighbour's camera entitled the Woolleys to £17,000 in damages, without the need for them to demonstrate any actual financial loss. The judgment builds on a 2015 English court ruling against Google for spying on logged out Safari users, where the users were not required to show financial losses to receive compensation for private surveillance.
Govt Surveillance == Good, Private Surveillance == Bad
Anyone in US should be weary of recording Audio for these very reasons, Imagery is protected federally but not audio.. see: Bert P. Krages - Attorney at Law