US Elections (& Politics) :)

Oceanslider

Known around here
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
7,194
Reaction score
24,640
Location
Southern California, USA
He's a glowie. he's being protected and he's a lying piece of shit

OUTRAGEOUS: Ray Epps on 60 Minutes Plays Innocent Victim - Says "It's Hard to See Our Capitol Under Attack" | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

In his 60 minutes propaganda interview, Ray Epps was labeled a Trump supporter, a former Oath Keepers member, and an innocent victim.
60 Minutes tried to paint Epps as innocent but they failed badly. The evidence is overwhelming to the contrary.

I watched it. Totally orchestrated piece for the Atombrained (as calling them Peabrained is giving them too much credit).
 

Sybertiger

Known around here
Joined
Jun 30, 2018
Messages
4,864
Reaction score
14,136
Location
Orlando
Last edited:

TonyR

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
17,687
Reaction score
41,178
Location
Alabama
Good article; sad but true ==>> Unpopular President Announces Reelection Bid…Why?

Excerpt:

"His weak pathetic Foreign Policy Efforts, including the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, have emboldened our enemies, have cost American lives, and have placed us on the precipice of World War III.
Meanwhile, his Domestic Policies have rewarded the slothful, the criminals, and the sexual deviants while attacking hardworking Americans with good credit scores.
And, let us not forget inflation, high gas prices, and continuing supply chain issues.
So, why is Biden running again?
Well, it could be that the Democrats don’t want to bear witness to 9 Biden Crime Family members going on trial and then being frog-marched to jail.
More than likely, the Democrat Elite has decided that the Candidate Pool is so weak that they might as well have him run in order to control him as a figurehead for 4 more years.
Either way, we will be the new Venezuela at the end of his second term if he somehow gets reelected."
 

Parley

Known around here
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
5,761
Reaction score
16,670
Location
Cypress, California
The Credit Card Debt Bubble Is About To Explode

"...While the banks might be fine, some cash-strapped and credit-abusing consumers clearly are not. The idea that JPM is building reserves to cushion themselves against bad loans amid rapidly increasing charge-offs tells you all you need to know.
Similar story at Bank of America (BAC), who also increased reserves.
Across the nation’s four biggest banks, consumer loan charge-offs increased 73% in Q1, as they wrote off $3.4 billion in bad debt during the first three months of the year. "

The Credit Card Debt Bubble Is About To Explode (msn.com)

Comment: "They will increase the interest rates on people with high credit ratings and charge an extra fee for the people who carry no balance. This is to subsidize people who make poor choices in life.
Just like Mortgages."
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
18,357
Reaction score
50,975
Location
Floriduh
Disturbing:

From the actual UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) report:

Decriminalize Sex with Minors

If you didn’t think this UN guidance could get much worse, it does. Principle 16 is so depraved that I worry you will think I am taking it out of context, so I am going to quote the entire guidance for you below, with particular portions emphasized:

Consensual sexual conduct, irrespective of the type of sexual activity, the sex/ gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression of the people involved or their marital status, may not be criminalized in any circumstances. Consensual same-sex, as well as consensual different-sex sexual relations, or consensual sexual relations with or between trans, non-binary and other genderdiverse people, or outside marriage – whether pre-marital or extramarital – may, therefore, never be criminalized.

With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage.

Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them. Pursuant to their evolving capacities and progressive autonomy, persons under 18 years of age should participate in decisions affecting them, with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests, and with specific attention to non-discrimination guarantees. [emphasis ours]


Yes, that is the United Nations explicitly suggesting that sex with minors “may be consensual” and that our laws should reflect that. And notice that nowhere do they provide guidance on what age a “minor” can “consent,” other than to say “under 18 years of age.” Therefore, we must conclude that they mean this to include any child—toddler, middle schooler, or teen. It’s all so stomach turning!


But it’s the natural consequence of today’s sexual ethic, which is now entirely consent based. No sexual act is actually wrong or immoral as long as the parties involved “consented.” But consent is an extremely flimsy morality as “consent” can easily be obtained through grooming, coercion, and slow-and-gradual desensitization. (Pause and ask yourself if this type of grooming for “consent” from children is not exactly what’s happening with the sexual content being taught to children as young as preschool in public schools and through the media and social media every single day?)
 

TonyR

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
17,687
Reaction score
41,178
Location
Alabama
Disturbing:

From the actual UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) report:

Decriminalize Sex with Minors

If you didn’t think this UN guidance could get much worse, it does. Principle 16 is so depraved that I worry you will think I am taking it out of context, so I am going to quote the entire guidance for you below, with particular portions emphasized:

Consensual sexual conduct, irrespective of the type of sexual activity, the sex/ gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression of the people involved or their marital status, may not be criminalized in any circumstances. Consensual same-sex, as well as consensual different-sex sexual relations, or consensual sexual relations with or between trans, non-binary and other genderdiverse people, or outside marriage – whether pre-marital or extramarital – may, therefore, never be criminalized.

With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage.

Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them. Pursuant to their evolving capacities and progressive autonomy, persons under 18 years of age should participate in decisions affecting them, with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests, and with specific attention to non-discrimination guarantees. [emphasis ours]


Yes, that is the United Nations explicitly suggesting that sex with minors “may be consensual” and that our laws should reflect that. And notice that nowhere do they provide guidance on what age a “minor” can “consent,” other than to say “under 18 years of age.” Therefore, we must conclude that they mean this to include any child—toddler, middle schooler, or teen. It’s all so stomach turning!


But it’s the natural consequence of today’s sexual ethic, which is now entirely consent based. No sexual act is actually wrong or immoral as long as the parties involved “consented.” But consent is an extremely flimsy morality as “consent” can easily be obtained through grooming, coercion, and slow-and-gradual desensitization. (Pause and ask yourself if this type of grooming for “consent” from children is not exactly what’s happening with the sexual content being taught to children as young as preschool in public schools and through the media and social media every single day?)
This confirms the depravity of the global order that our current admin wants to join. What was once a heinous crime just a few years ago has now become a goal, a milestone of achievement to the immoral, lascivious and morally bankrupt liberal left. :mad:

Now I don't know how well this would go over in other parts of the world or even here in the U.S. but I have no doubt somebody would wind up missing if they try to pull that crap down here in my neck of the woods. :headbang:
 
Top