US Elections (& Politics) :)

GOP Sen. Mitt Romney praises Kamala Harris’ debate performance: ‘Intelligent, capable person’

Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) praised Vice President Kamala Harris’ debate performance Wednesday, arguing that the Democratic nominee demonstrated that she is “intelligent” and “capable” in her first showdown against former President Donald Trump.

Romney, a longtime Trump critic who has refused to vote for the GOP nominee for president going back to 2016, told reporters on Capitol Hill that the ABC News debate proved Harris can “answer questions from the media.”

“Those were answered well. She spoke well and clearly and I think she prosecuted her case well,” the Utah Republican said.

Romney, who lost the 2012 White House race to former President Barack Obama, argued that Harris made the most of her opportunity to distinguish herself from Trump before some 67 million viewers.

And people saw, actually, she’s an intelligent, capable person who has a point of view on issues,” he added. “And she actually demonstrated that time and again.”

Meanwhile, the former Massachusetts governor argued that Trump’s performance was just that — “a performance.”

“This was classic President Trump,” Romney said.

“President Trump prosecuted his case as he wanted to,” he added.

Harris, 59, invoked Romey’s name at one point in the debate, touting having the support of “200 Republicans who have formerly worked with President [George W] Bush, Mitt Romney, and John McCain.”***

GOP Sen. Mitt Romney praises Kamala Harris’ debate performance (nypost.com)
Romney is the biggest RINO of them all....plus he's an asshole.:headbang:
 
 
Debate Recap - The Surprises, Good, Bad, and Ugly
JP Reacts


 
  • Like
Reactions: David L
I don't think it matters. I feel like the fix is in, and Harris will be INSTALLED in the White House... :confused:
I sincerely hope you are wrong. The US will not survive another four years of this bone-headed ignorance and political puppetry. I do believe a veil/curtain has been drawn back, more people than ever see what is happening, and they DO NOT LIKE IT.
 
This is a very good watch:

 
Last edited:
My brother just sent me this:

Last nights debate between President Trump and Democrat nominee David Muir at ABC News
was strange because there was an Indian Woman from Canada standing on the stage the entire time.


Hahahahahahahahahaha
 
 
1726162893772.png
 
1726178569633.png

Clandestine
@WarClandestine

We are witnessing a fascinating post-debate shift.


The ABC “fact-checks” were not true, which has inversely drawn MORE attention to these topics, aka the Streisand Effect.
-Springfield
-Late term abortion
-Gun confiscation

Public discourse on X has thoroughly debunked ABC’s “fact-checks” and brought video receipts for every single Kamala lie. As time goes on, public perception is falling more in favor of Trump, thanks to the reach and influence of citizen journalists on X, and other social media, circulating the video evidence that disproves Kamala/ABC’s lies from the debate.

This not only proves Kamala and ABC lied, but it’s further confirmation that the MSM are in bed with the DNC, and once again proves Trump was right about the media being corrupt and out to get him. The more the media attack him with such blatant bias, the more it validates Trump’s entire narrative, and discredits the Dems for weaponizing the media against Trump. They just proved a “Deep State” exists, while the entire world was watching.

Initially, I did not think this debate would have much impact on public perception or change the calculus in November, but as I observe the public’s response on social media, I think this performance from ABC woke up more people than I projected.

Normally the moderators are more subtle with their bias, but ABC made it so obvious, that some of the remaining normies are starting to notice. Glitches in the matrix.

 


via: Catturd ™
@catturd2

Black Insurrectionist--I FOLLOW BACK TRUE PATRIOTS
@DocNetyoutube
10:18 AM · Sep 12, 2024

I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate. I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower. The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage. I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.
 
No, I don't believe it will shock a lot of people. We're already beyond fed up with the incompetence and corruption in the US federal government. I won't be the least bit surprised.
Same here. Matter of fact, I'll only be surprised if it's NOT as bad as I have imagined. :wtf: