Trump has the swamp monster by the tail but until you pull it up out of the sewage there's no telling how big the creature is. Might be the Kraken at the end of it.
In a move that will make me wildly unpopular I want to stand up some for the IRS. Most of what we hate the IRS for is caused by congress, and the IRS is just administering their destructive nonsense. Congress uses the tax laws for its social engineering, and keeps piling new turds on top of the old turds, ending up with a bigger and bigger pile of . A well known example is the social security taxation worksheet, the 18 step calculation with seemingly nonsense steps, and no clue given as to what the steps are doing or why they're doing it. I tried making the calculation into an equation for a spreadsheet and finally gave up, and just mirrored the 18 steps. This and other worksheets that "ordinary" people are confronted with are the tip of the iceberg, very trivial compared to what trusts and corporations face. Like any big government bureaucracy the IRS is dirty, but the root of the problem is congress.next it might be the IRS!
In a move that will make me wildly unpopular I want to stand up some for the IRS. Most of what we hate the IRS for is caused by congress, and the IRS is just administering their destructive nonsense. Congress uses the tax laws for its social engineering, and keeps piling new turds on top of the old turds, ending up with a bigger and bigger pile of . A well known example is the social security taxation worksheet, the 18 step calculation with seemingly nonsense steps, and no clue given as to what the steps are doing or why they're doing it. I tried making the calculation into an equation for a spreadsheet and finally gave up, and just mirrored the 18 steps. This and other worksheets that "ordinary" people are confronted with are the tip of the iceberg, very trivial compared to what trusts and corporations face. Like any big government bureaucracy the IRS is dirty, but the root of the problem is congress.
For an Oregon example, in 2006 the legislature set the estate tax threshold at $1 million. It's still $1 million 19 years later, capturing a large percentage of otherwise poor homeowners in the Portland and a few other areas. More and more people hate the taxing agency for this, but it's 100% the fault of the permanent democrat legislature.
I sent a form to the treasury for a savings bond registration name change. They at least sent an email that they received it, and it will take at least 20 weeks. It's very close to 30 weeks now.“oh yeah due to Covid it’s taking on avg 493 days to resolve these” so you should have it by April
I'm surprised she didn't say "Math is racist! Your racist for doubting my math! Police, arrest this man immediately!!!"We’ve promoted stupidity for far too long. Time to call it what it is
————————…….
I was at Walmart, scanning and bagging nearly $300 worth of groceries, while the employee who wants $15 an hour "monitored" me. Then this happened:
Her: Why are you double-bagging all your groceries?
Me: Excuse me?
Her: You're wasting our bags!
Me: If you don’t like how I’m bagging, feel free to come over and do it yourself.
Her: That’s not my job!
Me: Okay, then I’ll bag my groceries however I please.
Her: Why are you using two bags?!
Me: Because the bags are weak, and I don’t want the handles to break or the bottom to rip.
Her: That’s because you’re putting too much in one bag. If you took half out and used a separate bag, you wouldn’t need to double-bag.
Cue 10 seconds of me just staring at her.
Me: So, you want me to split these items in half and put them in two separate bags instead of double-bagging?
Her: Exactly.
Me: So I’d still be using two bags for the same number of items.
Her: No, because you wouldn’t be double-bagging.
Me pressing two fingers to my left eye, trying to stop it from twitching.
Me: Okay, so here’s a jug of milk and a bottle of juice, double-bagged. If I take the milk out, remove the extra bag, and put the milk in one bag and the juice in another, I’m still using two bags for two items.
Her: No, because you're not double-bagging them—it’s not the same number of bags.
Me looking around at about 10 other customers, all enjoying the show.
Me: Is this that Common Core math I keep hearing about?
Her: Never mind, you just don’t get it.
And with that, she went back to her little podium to continue texting, playing games, or whatever she was doing before deciding to critique my bagging skills.
~ author unknown ~
Turns out the ‘Deep State’ used USAID to OUST Bolsonaro from Brazil…
Mike Benz on how USAID spent tens of millions of dollars of US taxpayer funds to remove Jair Bolsonaro from power and end free speech in Brazil:
“When populist waves swept the world within the U. S. in 2016 with Trump and with what happened all over Europe with Marine Le Pen and Matteo Salvini and Nigel Farage, USAID declared censorship holy war against every single populist group, including Bolsonaro. Steve, I’m telling you right now, if USAID did not exist, Bolsonaro would still be the president of Brazil and Brazil would still have a free and open internet.
It was USAID that spent tens of millions of dollars of American taxpayer money funding the push to get anti misinformation bills passed in the parliament there. Funding the legal advocates who pushed the censorship court there, the TSE, to crack down on Bolsonaro. tweets and WhatsApp and Telegram messages.
They built a censorship octopus in Brazil and it was built entirely on USAID because USAID declared Bolsonaro a populist, Trump of the tropics, and then set up this operation to control the information ecosystem there. One of the USAID grantees even said on a public call that the purpose was to eliminate the, uh, the international exchange of ideas between the Trump movement and the Bolsonaro movement.
That’s what USAID does. They kill domestic populism because it gets in the way of their foreign policy goals.”
Turns out the 'Deep State' used USAID to OUST Bolsonaro from Brazil... - Revolver News