This is what I figured. When you can't defend the indefensible attack the source.
All you are doing is parroting what the president's defenders are claiming by going back to the same old, stale talking points in an attempt to discredit the results. Almost like you've cut and pasted a paragraph from trump Tweet.
Of course DT's team jumped on this "attack the source" strategy. GOP Senators dutifully formed investigative committees, Barr sent investigators to investigate. What became of all this? Well, not a lot. Each side of course claimed vindication and nothing with respect to the actual findings has changed.
Question: I'm not claiming that this has much of anything to do with your position on the matter but have you read the actual Mueller report? I think that no matter what each side wants to believe, that it would be constructive if somehow everyone knew exactly what it contains rather than a brief, exculpatory summary put forward by Barr.