US Elections (& Politics) :)

Yep, the media is going all out to support this failed administration. :mad:
Actually, the media is beginning to turn on this failed administration.
It's all part of a very carefully scripted plan, one we still do not fully appreciate.
But make no mistake, the media is guilty and filthy dirty guilty.
They will pay for their misdeeds, one way or another.
I just hope it's very soon.
 
Well, it looks like Prez Blowfish loses another round in the courts:

NEW YORK (AP) — New York’s highest court on Tuesday rejected former President Donald Trump’s last-ditch effort to avoid testifying in the state attorney genera l’s civil investigation into his business practices, clearing the way for his deposition next month.

The state’s Court of Appeals said there was no “substantial constitutional question” that would warrant its intervention in the matter following an intermediate appellate court’s ruling last month enforcing a subpoena for Trump’s testimony.

The court also dismissed a motion by Trump’s lawyers to stay the subpoenas, saying that doing so would be “academic,” since it wasn’t taking up the former president’s appeal in the first place.

Hey ctgoldwing, this is just for you. :p

Schiff and Cheney Get Clown-slapped for J6 Whopper – PJ Media
 
It is amazing the crime the Left will openly demonstrate in public, showing the world just how fucked the US is. The mothers of the idiots that did this should be slapping themselves silly right now for not swallowing those loads.



I do have one question: How do you pronounce the name of the host????

Charity-Barry-Fundraiser (1).jpeg
 
Wonder if BoJo is aware of his next shortage crisis? Kind of doubt it.

 
T6ruFhz0o_aQf5uIHUQKLaKl2szVKPA4jGrURP-raBTcOI-L-YafbRmOASMUpZaPrx9xW6snHLnWBE4oI1DCoME20gzCL1PZ4QDNM3oHnA=s0-d-e1-ft


To those of you reading this via Substack: We sincerely appreciate so many of you taking the time to LIKE these newsletters. And we especially appreciate so many of you SHARING these newsletters with your friends. THANK YOU!

June 15, 2022
So many lies in just one week


Dear Patriots,


We are as frustrated as you are with The Swamp and its current political theater.

We would like to share with you some videos taken from prior Congressional hearings. Congress knows the voting machines are capable of altering votes and are easily hacked.

Ask yourself while you watch them: How is it that voting machine fraud and election security became "crazy" concepts only when Trump lost and raised the issues?

For two decades prior to 2020, Congress and many Democrats frequently spoke of voting machines being able to alter votes and election outcomes, and they heard sworn testimony about all of it, including algorithms.

While many of you, our wonderful supporters included, already realize this blatant Uniparty hypocrisy and their lies, many others still can't see it. Show them:

Video One: Here are people, many you will recognize, testifying in substantive Congressional hearings about how voting machines can be hacked and used to rig election results.

For once, we agree with then-Senator Kamala Harris: We must move back to paper ballots!
Video Two: In 2004, eighteen years ago, a computer programmer, Clint Curtis, while under oath, described in detail how he wrote an algorithm in Florida in 2000.
Among the members of Congress who heard his sworn testimony were Jerry Nadler and Maxine Waters. In this short clip, Mr. Curtis also explains algorithms can be written so that they disappear.

R6A9v5Ly2DrWjCyDdRQQrV2Jfm9BqLvuSEv1fGv33wC7qSPZNLPFJ5VH-vvO7p9yeJPmAP6BJdkBZYRn4epb5locy2OxhDsfo3r1vw_HBmJx__Sr=s0-d-e1-ft

1- There have been so many bald-faced, provable lies told with straight faces in the last week that we wanted to offer you some facts on the matter.
Read the whole thing, available at the link. Pass this along to those in your orbit.

Julie Kelly At American Greatness
January 6 for Non-Dummies

QUOTE: The January 6 committee is pure political theater intended to crush the MAGA movement once and for all. And like so many attempts before—the Russian collusion hoax, the first impeachment trial, the stolen 2020 election, the second impeachment trial—Democrats and the media are successfully brainwashing millions of their cult-like disciples who allow themselves to be duped time and again by the likes of Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).

Facts, as they say, do matter—and the aforementioned list is just a handful of indisputable truths related to January 6, 2021, that the other side doesn't want the American people to see. So share it widely.

R6A9v5Ly2DrWjCyDdRQQrV2Jfm9BqLvuSEv1fGv33wC7qSPZNLPFJ5VH-vvO7p9yeJPmAP6BJdkBZYRn4epb5locy2OxhDsfo3r1vw_HBmJx__Sr=s0-d-e1-ft

2- The left tries to make you forget that they have been refusing to accept election results for decades.

Katie Pavlich at Townhall

Here's a Long List of Prominent Democrats Refusing to Accept Election Results
QUOTE: Democrats on Capitol Hill are holding hearings this week to examine January 6, 2021 and their allegation President Donald Trump, along with Republicans on Capitol Hill, launched an "assault on democracy" by questioning or rejecting the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Conveniently, Democrats are failing to highlight their own "assault on Democracy" over the years.

The first example is Democrat Congressman Bennie Thompson, who is leading the January 6 Committee. Thompson voted against the certification of the 2004 presidential election and refused to attend President Trump's inauguration.

Democrat Congressman Jamie Raskin, who is also a leading figure on the committee, did the same and voted against the certification of the 2016 presidential election.

Former Democratic Senator and current Vice President Kamala Harris agreed and repeatedly claimed Trump was an illegitimate president.

Twice failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton still claims the 2016 election was stolen from her and fueled the despicable lie that President Trump wasn't elected, but installed by the Russian government.

Current Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, who lost a previous race to current Republican Governor Brian Kemp, has never conceded the 2018 race.
R6A9v5Ly2DrWjCyDdRQQrV2Jfm9BqLvuSEv1fGv33wC7qSPZNLPFJ5VH-vvO7p9yeJPmAP6BJdkBZYRn4epb5locy2OxhDsfo3r1vw_HBmJx__Sr=s0-d-e1-ft

3- Here is a debate we would actually pay to see!

Western Journalism
D'Souza Challenges Barr to Debate Him Over Claims Contained in '2000 Mules'

QUOTE: Conservative filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza is challenging former Attorney General William Barr to a debate over the findings in D'Souza's documentary "2000 Mules" that questioned the integrity of the 2020 general election.
D'Souza threw down the gauntlet after Barr laughed when referring to the movie during a recorded deposition that was aired by the House January 6 committee Monday.

"My opinion then, and my opinion now, is that the election was not stolen by fraud," Barr said.
"And I haven't seen anything since the election that changes my mind, including the '2000 Mules' movie," he added, before he began to laugh.

Committee member Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California asked Barr to provide his assessment of the documentary.
Barr responded that the Georgia Bureau of Investigation had looked into the cellphone geotracking evidence used in "2000 Mules" by the vote integrity group True the Vote — which partnered with D'Souza in making "2000 Mules" — and was "unimpressed with it."

D'Souza responded in a series of tweets, including one that called on Barr to debate him.
"I'd like to invite Bill Barr to a public debate on election fraud. Given his blithe chuckling dismissal of #2000Mules this should be easy for him. What do you say, Barr? Do you dare to back up your belly laughs with arguments that can withstand rebuttal and cross-examination?"

R6A9v5Ly2DrWjCyDdRQQrV2Jfm9BqLvuSEv1fGv33wC7qSPZNLPFJ5VH-vvO7p9yeJPmAP6BJdkBZYRn4epb5locy2OxhDsfo3r1vw_HBmJx__Sr=s0-d-e1-ft

4- More food for thought.

QUOTE: An excuse used in the 2020 election rears its ugly head again...but this time, it goes uncorrected. There is a willful ignorance to even address it!

CannCon on Substack

Is Dekalb Co. the new Antrim?

QUOTE: We all remember Antrim Co, MI from the 2020 election: the blood red county initially returned mind blowing numbers that showed Joe Biden won the contest in that county despite the overwhelming Pro Trump sentiment. But then, the following morning, someone brought this up to election officials and they quickly took down the results. From there, all hell broke lose.

QUOTE: The ensuing case, Bailey v. Antrim Co, produced a report from J. Alex Halderman titled "Analysis of Antrim County, Michigan, November 2020 Election Incident." Halderman is no stranger to Georgia voters either after he released another report, this time on Dominion ICX machines in Georgia that led the CISA to release an advisory acknowledging major vulnerabilities on the Dominion Democracy Suite software. CISA also released a list of mitigation recommendations for these vulnerabilities that has gone wildly unacknowledged by the oblivious election officials in Georgia. It is worth noting that this report is still sealed from the public by Judge Amy Totenberg. Why would a report outlining vulnerabilities in our elections be concealed from the public? This in and of itself should be infuriating.

This article is going to draw similarities between the Antrim Co report and what happened in Dekalb Co but has gone relatively unchecked.
R6A9v5Ly2DrWjCyDdRQQrV2Jfm9BqLvuSEv1fGv33wC7qSPZNLPFJ5VH-vvO7p9yeJPmAP6BJdkBZYRn4epb5locy2OxhDsfo3r1vw_HBmJx__Sr=s0-d-e1-ft

Hang in there. The Truth always prevails. It may take a long time, but, eventually Truth wins.
We battle the lies every day to expose the Truth and to equip you with it.

Pray. Share.
Hold Fast,

Defending The Republic


Comments or Questions? Contact: editor@defendingtherepublic.org

Join Our Fight

R6A9v5Ly2DrWjCyDdRQQrV2Jfm9BqLvuSEv1fGv33wC7qSPZNLPFJ5VH-vvO7p9yeJPmAP6BJdkBZYRn4epb5locy2OxhDsfo3r1vw_HBmJx__Sr=s0-d-e1-ft

To have confidence in the outcome of any election, we must continue to demand (1) real paper ballots, (2) hand counted in a bipartisan transparent process, and (3) citizen voter ID.
Missed a newsletter or to revisit a past newsletter? They are archived HERE .
NOTE: Defending The Republic, Inc. is a §501(c)(4) non-profit organization, gifts to which are not deductible as charitable contributions for Federal income tax purposes.

Follow Our Progress:
DefendingTheRepublic.org
DefendingTheRepublicPAC.com
SidneyPowell on GETTR
Sidney on Telegram

Sidney onTruthSocial: @realsidneypowell
SidneyPowell.com

DTR's Rumble page!
DTR GETTR

kfxfkLIFvbtzRl8kd8xkE2RF7g8dSg4kCKIUurX2AqHu--PDkgxfiCAHX9SKxCQAgn9VXX7gZEpKytpyb5Bd_LYcaao7tX4NYS4gmqMwqgSDGxw=s0-d-e1-ft

This email was sent by Defending The Republic, located at 2911 Turtle Creek - Suite 300; Dallas, Texas 75219 (United States).
 
I would say the constant unfavorable bombardment on President Trump by the media had its effect. Now people are realizing he was not as bad as the media made him out to be.
No, he was worse !!!

In the opening public hearings of the select committee investigating the riot on Jan. 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol, the most damning evidence that former President Donald Trump conspired to overturn a lawful election has come from the people Trump himself appointed or hired.

Former Trump Attorney General William Barr, for instance, told the committee that his former boss had "become detached from reality" on the subject of his election loss, adding that Trump had no "interest in what the actual facts were.” Barr described as "bulls***" and "complete nonsense" what he called Trump's "crazy" assertions that fraud had cost him the election, and said he had let the president know it.

In response to Barr's testimony to the committee, Trump predictably lashed out at the man he chose to be his attorney general, saying in a statement last week that "he sucked!"


It's well-known that many of the people who were willing to go to work for the former president have since revised their opinion of him. Trump's four years in the White House saw the highest turnover rate of any administration in U.S. history, and many of those who moved on appear to have left with a bitter taste in their mouth.

As Trump eyes another presidential bid, it is worth considering the people whose opinions of Trump deteriorated as a result of having worked for him. The following is a list of Trump aides and administration officials who have spoken out against their old boss.


Trump's pressure on his vice president, Mike Pence, to send the Electoral College results back to the states is at the center of the Jan. 6 select committee hearings. Pence's refusal to do so earned him the wrath of Trump and his supporters, who chanted "Hang Mike Pence!" as they ransacked the Capitol.

In a speech to the Federalist Society in February, Pence publicly disclosed his thinking about Trump's request.

“President Trump is wrong. I had no right to overturn the election,” Pence said, adding, “The presidency belongs to the American people, and the American people alone. And frankly, there is no idea more un-American than the notion that any one person could choose the American president.”
 
No, he was worse !!!

In the opening public hearings of the select committee investigating the riot on Jan. 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol, the most damning evidence that former President Donald Trump conspired to overturn a lawful election has come from the people Trump himself appointed or hired.

Former Trump Attorney General William Barr, for instance, told the committee that his former boss had "become detached from reality" on the subject of his election loss, adding that Trump had no "interest in what the actual facts were.” Barr described as "bulls***" and "complete nonsense" what he called Trump's "crazy" assertions that fraud had cost him the election, and said he had let the president know it.

In response to Barr's testimony to the committee, Trump predictably lashed out at the man he chose to be his attorney general, saying in a statement last week that "he sucked!"


It's well-known that many of the people who were willing to go to work for the former president have since revised their opinion of him. Trump's four years in the White House saw the highest turnover rate of any administration in U.S. history, and many of those who moved on appear to have left with a bitter taste in their mouth.

As Trump eyes another presidential bid, it is worth considering the people whose opinions of Trump deteriorated as a result of having worked for him. The following is a list of Trump aides and administration officials who have spoken out against their old boss.


Trump's pressure on his vice president, Mike Pence, to send the Electoral College results back to the states is at the center of the Jan. 6 select committee hearings. Pence's refusal to do so earned him the wrath of Trump and his supporters, who chanted "Hang Mike Pence!" as they ransacked the Capitol.

In a speech to the Federalist Society in February, Pence publicly disclosed his thinking about Trump's request.

“President Trump is wrong. I had no right to overturn the election,” Pence said, adding, “The presidency belongs to the American people, and the American people alone. And frankly, there is no idea more un-American than the notion that any one person could choose the American president.”

Having watched full press conferences from Trump and Biden - and just judging by what the Trump and Biden states and what the press publishes .. I'd have to completely agree that the press was 110% against Trump and now 110% pro Biden ..

Not truly happy with either one myself, but I must say I am extremely disappointed that the Democrats gave us the option of team Biden - Hunter .. really .. is this the best they could have done??

Blah ..
 


Apparently, the Patriot Front members were not in possession of any weapons. They had one smoke bomb between them. And they were planning to march to the gay pride rally and then march back.

For some reason the FBI is involved as we expected.

Via The Federalist.

Each individual was charged with one misdemeanor, “conspiracy to commit riot,” based on the fact that the men involved were dressed in distinguished uniforms of khaki pants and blue t-shirts, plus some of them had shin guards and shields. There were no guns nor ammunition, but they did have some kind of document spelling out a plan to march in a line through a downtown park and agitate passersby.

The intent was to align in “a column forming on the outside of the park, proceeding inward, until barriers to approach are met,” according to The New York Times, and “once an appropriate amount of confrontational dynamic has been established the column will disengage and head to Sherman [Ave.].” In other words: Show up, irritate pedestrians, and then leave.

It’s certainly annoying and offensive, but since when did that require two press conferences from the police chief and fire-alarm coverage from The New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, and on and on?..

…Okay, so why was there a major arrest of an unaffiliated group that had nothing but a single smoke bomb? (Which, by the way, would have had minimal effect outdoors.)

White said his department is even working with the FBI on this matter involving misdemeanor charges. (Hmm… where have we seen that before?)

This is an important story. Not because “white nationalists” are involved. But because for curious reasons, the FBI is.
So the question still remains, how many feds were included in the group on Saturday?
 
Last edited:
No, he was worse !!!

In the opening public hearings of the select committee investigating the riot on Jan. 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol, the most damning evidence that former President Donald Trump conspired to overturn a lawful election has come from the people Trump himself appointed or hired.

Former Trump Attorney General William Barr, for instance, told the committee that his former boss had "become detached from reality" on the subject of his election loss, adding that Trump had no "interest in what the actual facts were.” Barr described as "bulls***" and "complete nonsense" what he called Trump's "crazy" assertions that fraud had cost him the election, and said he had let the president know it.

In response to Barr's testimony to the committee, Trump predictably lashed out at the man he chose to be his attorney general, saying in a statement last week that "he sucked!"


It's well-known that many of the people who were willing to go to work for the former president have since revised their opinion of him. Trump's four years in the White House saw the highest turnover rate of any administration in U.S. history, and many of those who moved on appear to have left with a bitter taste in their mouth.

As Trump eyes another presidential bid, it is worth considering the people whose opinions of Trump deteriorated as a result of having worked for him. The following is a list of Trump aides and administration officials who have spoken out against their old boss.


Trump's pressure on his vice president, Mike Pence, to send the Electoral College results back to the states is at the center of the Jan. 6 select committee hearings. Pence's refusal to do so earned him the wrath of Trump and his supporters, who chanted "Hang Mike Pence!" as they ransacked the Capitol.

In a speech to the Federalist Society in February, Pence publicly disclosed his thinking about Trump's request.

“President Trump is wrong. I had no right to overturn the election,” Pence said, adding, “The presidency belongs to the American people, and the American people alone. And frankly, there is no idea more un-American than the notion that any one person could choose the American president.”

You just do not get it. The old establishment is against an outsider such as President Trump. They want to continue the old corrupt ways of Washington DC. We call the people you are quoting Assistant Democrats.
 
You just do not get it. The old establishment is against an outsider such as President Trump. They want to continue the old corrupt ways of Washington DC. We call the people you are quoting Assistant Democrats.
Hey! we are in the largest inflation increase and on the verge of biggest recession of my working life, shouldn't we just get on board with little joe and be trans'ing our children? Come on Parley, priorities man! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
You just do not get it. The old establishment is against an outsider such as President Trump. They want to continue the old corrupt ways of Washington DC. We call the people you are quoting Assistant Democrats.
And the Dems want D.C. to become a state so they can get 2 senators and more reps in the House....and you can't get any bluer than D.C. already is. :mad:
 
I got this e-mail (at bottom) today. Just read the crap it spews and if it's not clear to you why libs are so retarded then I can't help you.

Excerpt:
"....We aren't going to let the GOP take control of our American democracy and constitutional rights...."

What a load of bull$hit....anyone with half of a brain sees that it is the Dems that are trying to destroy democracy and take away our constitutional rights and our freedoms.

vote-blue.jpg
 
Last edited: