US Elections (& Politics) :)

I'll also say that this Magistrate was appointed by a Judge who WAS appointed by Obummer. Additionally he worked as a prosecutor on the Epstein case, then resigned his position to move to private practice where he defended some of those involved in the Epstein case. Normally, this would be called a conflict of interest I believe and at the very least, shows a complete lack of morals to me.

Giving the AG basically two weeks to produce the warrant is another giveaway. Why can't it be produced today or tomorrow? It is already printed on paper for heavens sake. What is so secretive about this warrant?

Let's also examine the FBI showing up with long guns, not just side arms, at a residence already guarded by the Secret Service who are very well armed with both sidearms and long guns plus, probably, other lethal devices and means. Totally not necessary. Why would they want the security camera system shut down other than to hide what they were doing and the same applies to forcing President Trumps attorney to stay outside of the premises as well as showing the warrant at a distance of about ten feet? Can you read a document at ten feet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VorlonFrog, Ssayer, SJGUSMC21 and 3 others
LOL go ahead and defend him.

You cherry picked.

Yes lawyers work for guilty people all the time. That wasn’t the only point.
————/

During his decade of representing Epstein and associated clients, Reinhart was named in a Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit in 2011. He was accused of violating the Justice Department’s policy of switching sides and potentially leveraging insider information about Epstein’s case in order to curry favor, the Miami Herald alleged. He also made plans to set up his private practice when he was still serving as a federal prosecutor in South Florida, the outlet alleged in another article.

In 2011, Reinhart swore under penalty of perjury that he had nothing to do with Epstein’s investigation and had zero information on his case, but his supervisors filed a court paper contradicting the claim, the Miami Herald reported.

(RELATED: ‘Jeffrey Epstein With The Clintons?’: Lawyer Asks Alex Jones About Pedophilia. It Goes About How You’d Expect)

“While Bruce E. Reinhart was an assistant U.S. attorney, he learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter … [Reinhart] ‘joined Epstein’s payroll shortly after important decisions were made limiting Epstein’s criminal liability’ and improperly represented Epstein victims in follow-on civil suits,” plaintiffs in the Jane Does #1 and #2 v. United States case alleged.

Reinhart reportedly quit working for the U.S. attorney’s office on New Years Day of 2008 and started working for Epstein on January 2, 2008, the New York Post reported. His clients included Epstein’s pilots, his scheduler and a woman called Nadia Marcinkova, who Epstein described as his “Yugoslavian sex slave,” according to the outlet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ssayer, Parley, samplenhold and 1 other person
DOJ source calls raid a 'spectacular backfire,' claims AG Garland didn't approve it

It seems the DOJ has decided to leak an explanation of their decision to use a search warrant in this case. Newsweek just published an exclusive report based on anonymous DOJ sources which claims the FBI had a confidential source at Mar-a-Lago, one who informed them that Trump was hiding documents and even specified where they could be found.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was based largely on information from an FBI confidential human source, one who was able to identify what classified documents former President Trump was still hiding and even the location of those documents, two senior government officials told Newsweek.

Before we go any further, remember that the FBI apparently brought along a safe-cracker who opened Trump’s safe. Presumably that suggests they were told by their confidential source that there were documents hidden in the safe. But by all accounts there was nothing in the safe and the FBI didn’t take anything from it. Does that mean the confidential source got it wrong?

DOJ source calls raid a 'spectacular backfire,' claims AG Garland didn't approve it – HotAir

Couple of thoughts on this. Looks like everyone is trying to cover their asses on this. Also it seems to me that they did not get the documentation that they thought was there. Bwahahahahahahaha
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: bigredfish, VorlonFrog, sebastiantombs and 2 others
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: bigredfish, VorlonFrog, David L and 4 others
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Haha
Reactions: bigredfish, VorlonFrog, sebastiantombs and 5 others
sebastiantombs said:
I'll also say that tis Magistrate was appointed by a Judge who WAS appointed by Obummer
Click to expand...

You'd also be wrong

Some tasks of the district court are given to federal magistrate judges. Magistrates are appointed by the district court by a majority vote of the judges and serve for a term of eight years if full-time and four years if part-time, but they can be reappointed after completion of their term .

Introduction To The Federal Court System

www.justice.gov www.justice.gov
Click to expand...

bigredfish said:
LOL go ahead and defend him.
Click to expand...

I shouldn't have to. He is a Judge, by all appearances a conservative and methodical one, lawfully appointed, with lawful authority to issue search warrants. He should not be subject to public vilification and unsubstantiated innuendo for no other reason than he did the job he was paid to do. He especially shouldn't be subject to threats to the safety of his family as is being reported. The United States has a legal system for a reason. If the warrant was not issued lawfully, then there are avenues of appeal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VorlonFrog
Ssayer said:
View attachment 136171
Click to expand...
People like me super hard-working business owners. Luckily, I don't have anything to worry about. But I was audited about 16 years ago, I had nothing to hide then either, but it took hours over many days of my precious time getting all the paperwork copied and dropped off, it was a nightmare. Months went by, I had to contact them to find out all was good, jerks.

I bet they have a woke HR already in place for this hiring.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: bigredfish, VorlonFrog, David L and 7 others
Oceanslider said:
People like me super hard-working business owners. Luckily, I don't have anything to worry about. But I was audited about 16 years ago, I had nothing to hide then either, but it took hours over many days of my precious time getting all the paperwork copied and dropped off, it was a nightmare. Months went by, I had to contact them to find out all was good, jerks.

I bet they have a woke HR already in place for this hiring.
Click to expand...

I knew someone who got audited each and every year awhile back .. they had nothing on them, but seemed to like to pull them in for fun and games ..
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Angry
Reactions: VorlonFrog, Oceanslider, sebastiantombs and 4 others
Wow, read this article. Really a National Security Threat? Trump a President that didn't debacle Afghanistan and didn't have Russia invading Ukraine. And Milley, the trans advocate, saying "I will fight from the inside", what, going against the Commander In Chief, because he knows better or something?

www.newyorker.com

Inside the War Between Trump and His Generals

How Mark Milley and others in the Pentagon handled the national-security threat posed by their own Commander-in-Chief.
www.newyorker.com www.newyorker.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigredfish, srvfan, VorlonFrog and 4 others
Oceanslider said:
Wow, read this article. Really a National Security Threat? Trump a President that didn't debacle Afghanistan and didn't have Russia invading Ukraine. And Milley, the trans advocate, saying "I will fight from the inside", what, going against the Commander In Chief, because he knows better or something?

www.newyorker.com

Inside the War Between Trump and His Generals

How Mark Milley and others in the Pentagon handled the national-security threat posed by their own Commander-in-Chief.
www.newyorker.com www.newyorker.com
Click to expand...
Imagine if Pelosi and Schumer had a son, he grew up privileged, went to Ivy League schools, never worked with his hands, never held a real job but developed an attitude that he knew all there was to know about everything......that's Milley.

He may have received his first ribbon on his uniform by hitting the toilet properly twice in a row when he took a piss. :drool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: rolibr24, bigredfish, VorlonFrog and 4 others
Oceanslider said:
Wow, read this article. Really a National Security Threat? Trump a President that didn't debacle Afghanistan and didn't have Russia invading Ukraine. And Milley, the trans advocate, saying "I will fight from the inside", what, going against the Commander In Chief, because he knows better or something?

www.newyorker.com

Inside the War Between Trump and His Generals

How Mark Milley and others in the Pentagon handled the national-security threat posed by their own Commander-in-Chief.
www.newyorker.com www.newyorker.com
Click to expand...

Didn't read the article but the libbies are the real national security threat....everyday in the news bold actions/statements from Russia, China, Iran plus inflation/recession plus world dependence on oil from bad actors. The nation has never been under more threat since when?

1660224221561.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: gwminor48, SJGUSMC21, bigredfish and 8 others
I've always said, that if you can take the money out of the equation it'll solve 95% of what everyone is fighting about. Think about the vast majority of problems we face as a country. Take out the financial incentive to money grab and all of a sudden we are fighting about very little. It's primarily all about redistribution of wealth.


1660224831964.png
1660224860521.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: rolibr24, gwminor48, mbuster and 8 others
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: gwminor48, bigredfish, Ssayer and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom