US Elections (& Politics) :)

rolibr24

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 3, 2021
Messages
639
Reaction score
2,953
Location
USA
Not gonna post text or images from the two collected message threads, but will give a very brief summary:
Staff / others meeting tonight to discuss possible upcoming resignation of Biden/Harris?

I don't give this larp a snowball's chance in Hell of being anywhere near true. Unfortunately. :(

Oh, what the heck. Here are links to the two collected posts:
One can only hope.

But please wait until after November
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
3,791
Reaction score
12,182
Location
Charlotte
Thread from Margot Cleveland, so really detailed info on the IG and OIG covering up for Sussman & Joffe
(read the article if you can, link at end)

Margot Cleveland @ProfMJCleveland
THREAD. Thanks to @Techno_Fog
I have confirmed that Joffe was terminated as an informant in 2021 for cause. Why is this key? Because that means Joffe was still an informant in 2017 when he had Sussmann go to the OIG as opposed to his handler. Sussmann's defense 1/
12:40 PM · May 18, 2022

2/ argued that Joffe gained nothing by having Sussmann share Alfa Bank data with FBI, to argue Sussmann wasn't representing him. The jury, of course, doesn't get to hear that Sussmann bragged about being lined up for a job with the Clinton campaign, so they might by argument.
12:44 PM · May 18, 2022

3/ But problem remains, if Joffe gained nothing by having Sussmann share Alfa Bank data with FBI, then why would Sussmann than share Alfa Bank & Yota phone data for Joffe with CIA (Clinton campaign was no longer involved at that time)? He obviously "gained" something b/c he did.
12:45 PM · May 18, 2022

4/ In fact, Sussmann told CIA contact if a high-up at CIA didn't take data his client would go to the New York Times. That also conflicts with Sussmann's claim that he wanted to help FBI by giving warning re press. The press was a hammer.
12:46 PM · May 18, 2022

5/ And Sussmann claimed Joffe didn't want Sussmann to take to FBI b/c he didn't trust FBI & because he thought FBI discounted b/c Sussmann's connection to Clinton. But Joffe WAS still an informant at that time, so take to handler.
12:47 PM · May 18, 2022

6/ Then, even more "strange" is Joffe having Sussmann take "intel" to DOJ Office of Inspector general in March 2017 NOT telling IG client's name. (DOJ IG office later withheld evidence on this from Durham's team).
https:/thefederalist.com/2022/01/31/special-counsel-clarification-reveals-the-dojs-inspector-general-is-not-a-team-player/ But

Special Counsel ‘Clarification’ Reveals The DOJ’s Inspector General Is Not A Team Player
(A lot of OIG employees with IGs were involved in covering for Sussmann and Joffe and who else knows how many more conspirators—this is mind blowing. I'm sure Horowitz is one, because he didn't share the cell phone data with Durham, and apparently from this article a number of other important matters.)

Excerpts from Article: OIG Made Another False Claim
An even more significant takeaway from the special counsel’s Friday supplemental filing concerns not what the OIG said, but what it did not say: After reading the “discovery update” the special counsel’s office filed, the OIG’s only objection concerned the potential that it had previously mentioned possessing cellphones to Durham in another investigation.

The OIG apparently raised no concerns about the special counsel’s office’s representations to the court concerning the “cyber-related matter” involving Joffe and Sussmann, including Durham’s statement that he learned from Sussmann—and not the OIG—that Sussmann had actually met with the IG, and not merely passed Joffe’s tip to an OIG agent.

From Friday’s filing, it also appears the OIG did not challenge Durham’s representation that when the OIG provided Durham’s team the “forensic report” about the Sussmann-Joffe tip, it falsely represented “that it had ‘no other file[] or other documentation’ relating to this cyber matter,” and that later, after Durham further questioned the OIG, additional documentation turned up. If the OIG thinks it has cleared its name, it is sadly mistaken.

7/ now knowing Joffe was still an informant until 2017, having SUSSMANN take the intel to OIG unanimously instead of Joffe taking to his handler makes NO SENSE. How did Joffe benefit? Unless, goal for Joffe was to bolster Sussmann's "credibility" for purposes of the FBI & CIA
12:54 PM · May 18, 2022

8/ tips. End of day, however, Sussmann's claim that Joffe didn't benefit by Sussmann taking intel to FBI doesn't hold water b/c Joffe also had Sussmann take intel to CIA & DOJ IG office instead of handler. He had a reason even if we don't know it.
12:55 PM · May 18, 2022

9/9 Will Durham be able to tell the jury about these facts? Court already ruled CIA meeting can come in, but will these points be made? We'll see.
12:56 PM · May 18, 2022·

https:/twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1526966069776220162?s=20&t=LEyqaN0jSkfBhVUCn8bRBA

Link to Article
https:/thefederalist.com/2022/01/31/special-counsel-clarification-reveals-the-dojs-inspector-general-is-not-a-team-player/
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
3,791
Reaction score
12,182
Location
Charlotte
1652915976263.png

On July 29, 2016, Sussmann billed the Clinton campaign through Perkins Coie for 5.3 hours of work on that day, $4,455. He cited work on “a confidential project” that included a 4:30-5 pm meeting with “Elias and others.” #SussmanTrial

https:/twitter.com/JFHaughey58/status/1526962786194137089?s=20


More from JF Haughey58 on Twitter:

Apparently Elias said something he wasn't supposed to about Sussmann and there was outrage on the part of the defense!!!

https:/twitter.com/JFHaughey58/status/1527022353577910274?s=20
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
3,791
Reaction score
12,182
Location
Charlotte
1652916336893.png

take this with a grain of salt but we should be doing that anyway

Patrick Byrne has been saying on Locals.com there are a series of leaks coming out about the Steal that are like a royal flush
2000 Mules according to him is not the Ace it's the King
the Queen was supposed to be out yesterday or today, that's what the screen grab is about
It wont be the Queen itself but some kind of legal filing that shows us what the Queen is if we look closely
the Queen is a lawsuit or something like that
Byrne also for months has been teasing what he calls an "Agatha Christie" clue, where he says we'll get a big piece of the puzzle (maybe the Ace card?) and it'll be something that we've heard about before like in Agatha Christie books.

Byrne blew a lot of smoke about the Mike Lindell/Kurt Olsen Attorneys General suit so he has over-promised but this is worth keeping an eye on IMO

Also, Mike Lindell let out the other day that Laura Logan is making a movie about the machines called (S)Election Code that they've been working on for months and there's another movie title they've teased I can't remember now. True The Vote also says they have moar that they will release in the coming weeks.

SO there's MOAR coming down the pipeline


Later other anons post snapshot images from Kash Patel's book:

1652918381086.png

1652918407548.png



1652918171143.png
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
3,791
Reaction score
12,182
Location
Charlotte
1652916966631.png

Louisiana AG’s investigation into 2020 election fraud concludes it really was rigged

In order to promote “safe elections” during the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic, Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan reportedly spent more than $400 million on the 2020 election, which we now know was a complete fraud.

This is according to Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry who recently concluded an investigation in the matter, which found that the 2020 election really was rigged and riddled with fraud.

Landry recently released a new documentary called “Rigged” that exposes the plot to steal the election from Donald Trump and hand it over to Joe Biden and his crime family syndicate.

As soon as he heard that Zuckerberg provided money specifically for Louisiana through a group called the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), Landry got to work probing the matter further.

It turns out that CTCL filed a grant application in September 2020 to get that money, which is right around the time that Landry figured out that the group runs “contrary to what we believed the law was in Louisiana.”

“We believed that the ability to inject direct money into our election system was prohibited,” Landry says about his state’s system.
Zuckerberg’s money successfully thwarted election outcomes in Wisconsin, Arizona

One month later, Landry and his office decided to sue CTCL because it refused to stop offering money to Democratic parishes throughout the state. The case initially received an unfavorable opinion but was later appealed and is now ongoing.

While it has not technically completed, the case already shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that shady dealings occurred to ensure an unfair election outcome that was not reflective of how We the People actually voted.

https:/www.newstarget.com/2022-05-17-louisiana-ag-investigation-2020-election-fraud-rigged.html
 

Oceanslider

Known around here
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
6,902
Reaction score
23,592
Location
Southern California, USA
This was perfect for biden. They have nothing else to prop themselves up on. The orchestrated Jan6 and now this. Of course, all condolences to the victims, but this mentally deranged kid, product of a broken household, put a diamond in biden's laps. And now he's showing it off.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
3,791
Reaction score
12,182
Location
Charlotte
https:/technofog.substack.com/p/day-2-of-the-michael-sussmann-trial?s=r

Day 2 of the Michael Sussmann Trial

Day 2 of the Michael Sussmann trial started with some housekeeping. Here are the rulings of note:

Robby Mook, who has a scheduled vacation in Spain, will testify on Friday. He’s a defense witness.

Evidence of Steele’s meetings with Sussmann and Fusion GPS in July 2016, and his tasking to conduct research on Alfa Bank, according to the judge, “can come in.” The judge observed they are “relevant to Mr. Sussmann’s activities for the campaign and his attorney-client relationship, as far as it went, with the campaign as it relates to Alfa-Bank.”

Onto the witnesses. We start with the short testimony of Deborah Fine.

Fine began working for the Hillary Clinton Campaign (aka Hillary for America) as “one of several deputy general counsels” in May 2016. She answered to Marc Elias, the campaign’s general counsel.

After being presented with calendar entries confirming her daily calls with Fusion GPS, she testified that she worked with them as “part of my work for the campaign.” In fact, she regularly interacted with Glenn Simpson and co-founder Peter Fritsch. Fine conceded that Fusion GPS were seemingly free to conduct research on their own, stating she “personally didn’t direct them” to accomplish specific tasks.

On cross, she admitted she didn’t now if Marc Elias spoke to anyone else at the Clinton Campaign about the activities of Fusion GPS. She was out of the loop regarding efforts to bring the Alfa Bank allegations to the NY Times or to the FBI.

Testimony of Laura Seago

Laura Seago worked with Fusion GPS back in 2016, where she reported directly to Fritsch and Simpson. She has been granted immunity by the Special Counsel for her testimony. She understood Marc Elias to be the Fusion GPS contact for the Clinton Campaign.

Seago stated she was present at a summer 2016 meeting with “Mr. Elias, my colleague Peter Fritsch from Fusion GPS, Mr. Sussmann, and Mr. Sussmann’s client Rodney Joffe.” As to the nature of that meeting:

“The general purpose, to the best of my recollection, was to discuss allegations of communications between the Trump organization and Alfa-Bank.”

Once the Alfa Bank allegations were developed, Seago met with journalist Franklin Foer (who would write the October 31, 2016 Alfa Bank article in Slate). The purpose of that meeting was to discuss “the allegations of communication between the Trump Organization and Alfa-Bank.”

They sold Foer on the Alfa Bank data at that meeting, telling him there were “highly credible computer scientists who seemed to think that these allegations were credible.” These “credible computer scientists” would ultimately be cited in Foer’s article. She admitted that Fusion GPS did nothing to validate the DNS records - something she said was “beyond my capabilities.”

Seago was walked-through a number of e-mails she had with Joffe and other members of Fusion GPS. Some of these were privileged (the Joffe e-mails) so the Special Counsel was unable to discuss with Seago the contents. However, she did know about contents of the Joffe e-mails generally:

Finally, she admitted to understanding whose interests were served by planting the Alfa Bank story.

Now we get to Marc Elias.

Elias meet weekly with Fusion GPS at his office. Typically Peter Fritsch and Glenn Simpson would be in attendance. Generally, those meetings involved discussions of Elias’s “needs” and Fusion GPS’s “work” - which included what Elias described as the “unusual connections” the Trump Campaign had with Russia. They would also report to Elias on their findings related to Trump during the election.

Notably, Elias mentioned Jake Sullivan as someone at the Clinton Campaign who knew about the Trump/Russia research (though there is uncertainty as to whether Sullivan knew about Fusion’s activities). Elias would give the campaign these updates.

A brief aside: Jake Sullivan’s wife is Margaret Goodlander - who serves as counsel to Attorney General Merrick Garland. We understand that she has not recused herself from anything having to do with the Special Counsel’s investigation. We further understand that Goodlander is keeping close tabs on Durham’s investigation. We’ll report on that down the road…

Anyway, Elias also testified that the Clinton Campaign paid them (Perkins Coie) a “flat fee” for their legal services. Why is this important? Because it explains why Sussmann would block bill the Clinton Campaign (see tweet below). (“Block billing” is having a multi-hour entry with a generalized description. Example: “6.5 hours on confidential project.) For flat fee work, attorneys are generally allowed block billing because the client isn’t paying the hourly rate.

John Haughey @JFHaughey58

Proceedings have resumed with more of Elias being queried on billing records that show Sussmann toiling on a "confidential project." July 29, 2016, $4,455 for 5.3 hours, and Aug. 12, 2016, $1,252 for 1.5 hours on “confidential meetings with M. Elias, others.” #SussmannTriaL .

May 18th 2022
50 Retweets131 Likes

The Special Counsel then walked Elias through a number of billing entries/emails from and involving Sussmann. These included meetings with Elias, meetings with Joffe, and Fusion - and involved “the Alfa-Bank allegations.”

That concludes the morning session. We’ll update this post once we receive the afternoon transcript…
 

Parley

Known around here
Joined
Dec 19, 2015
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
15,935
Location
Cypress, California
This was perfect for biden. They have nothing else to prop themselves up on. The orchestrated Jan6 and now this. Of course, all condolences to the victims, but this mentally deranged kid, product of a broken household, put a diamond in biden's laps. And now he's showing it off.
This really pisses me off. They are pushing this White Supremist thing full throttle. They are the ones tearing this nation apart. It is all about race 24/7 with the Democrats.

Edit: Biden and company are not trying in the least to cool things down. In fact they are the ones turning up the heat when it comes to race. It is all about power and finding and doing anything to get reelected. :mad:
 
Last edited:
Top