Used PC or server for Blue Iris

M

mosinman24680

n3wb
Jan 7, 2020
6
10
KY
I'm trying to figure out if what hardware I have would work for Blue Iris for the obvious cost savings.

Currently I'm running an older Dell 410 with 2x Xeon E5649. I have a couple VM's for firewall and on-the-go VPN to the house.

Would this configuration be sufficient for processing data from cameras if they do the encoding themselves?

I'd throw as many cores and as much RAM as I could at it.
Unsure how many cameras or what resolution they'd be so for this example lets assume 12 cameras running 4k at H265.

Idea would be to store the data and view on demand any camera via PC or web app.
 
While that dual Xeon has plenty of horsepower, it also is much older tech, generates more heat, and does NOT have Intel QuickSync technology, which is crucial for Blue Iris processing of h.264 video.
 
I believe that BI will only run on a single CPU. It can not use a dual CPU.

I would recommend a single standalone PC, run only bi and widows 10..
 
VorlonFrog said:
Also use an SSD of at least 256 GB as the system drive (C: ) with a 4 TB or larger WD Purple drive (D: ) for video storage.
Click to expand...
Why 256 for a dedicated machine ?
Win10 only takes about 20 gig and certainly BI only takes a few gig if that.
I've been considering SSD's for a dedicated BI machine and just can't figure out the need for a large one. Thanks.
 
I run 120 GB ssd on my BI windows 10 machine, It has a little less than 60GB used on the SSD.
All video data is stored on a 4 TB WD purple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandalay and StratRider
I would not go smaller than 120 GB. There are NTFS files,system files like pagefile.sys, swapfile.sys... , and BI files that will grow over time. Not big time growth, but grow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StratRider
VorlonFrog said:
and does NOT have Intel QuickSync technology, which is crucial for Blue Iris processing of h.264 video.
Click to expand...

With the release of BI 5.1.0.0 yesterday and them adding nVidia encoder support, it would be interesting to see how an nVidia card compares to QS. Where if he had a Xeon machine laying around and could slap in a nvidia card it may work out fine. But there are now some Xeon processors that do have an iGPU so things could change a bit.
 
immageek said:
With the release of BI 5.1.0.0 yesterday and them adding nVidia encoder support, it would be interesting to see how an nVidia card compares to QS. Where if he had a Xeon machine laying around and could slap in a nvidia card it may work out fine. But there are now some Xeon processors that do have an iGPU so things could change a bit.
Click to expand...
nvidia support has been around since 2018 in v4. Your result with be a power hungry space heater.
 
fenderman said:
nvidia support has been around since 2018 in v4. Your result with be a power hungry space heater.
Click to expand...
Well this update makes use of the newer encoder and they seem to make a big deal over it. But who knows what this new version will do since it just came out. I should move my BI over to me Xeon rig and get a card and pass it through and see how it works. There's plenty of ones that don't consume a ton of power, contrary to popular beleif, even the Dell 710/720s aren't that bad.
 
immageek said:
Well this update makes use of the newer encoder and they seem to make a big deal over it. But who knows what this new version will do since it just came out. I should move my BI over to me Xeon rig and get a card and pass it through and see how it works. There's plenty of ones that don't consume a ton of power, contrary to popular beleif, even the Dell 710/720s aren't that bad.
Click to expand...
There is nothing new in this update with respect to nvidia. You are confused.
The dell 710/720 are horrific for power consumption compared to a modern machine. Its a suckers choice, pay your electric company rather than yourself. The nvidia card just makes things much worse.
 
fenderman said:
There is nothing new in this update with respect to nvidia. You are confused.
Click to expand...

Ok, the log file seems to make a big deal over it. Especially since they have a link to a list that shows support for only the new cards. If I never noticed it in the other updates, then ok, but I don't remember seeing it.

The dell 710/720 are horrific for power consumption compared to a modern machine. Its a suckers choice, pay your electric company rather than yourself. The nvidia card just makes things much worse.
Click to expand...
No they aren't. Have you even used one? Mine idle at 60 watts. That's nothing. Yes, I know a little SFF HP or Dell are 20 or so watts, but a machine with 10 times the compute power with 60 watt draw is not "horrific". Add in a 40 watt nVidia card since that's all a passive pci-e slot can handle at best, again, isn't a power hog. I'm pretty sure you're confused on this part. To each their own, but I'd rather have a more useful Xeon server running eSXI and hosting multiple OSes and not needing a separate router, camera server and or NAS, when an all in one will consume less power, that's less of a suckers choice. But, I'm not going to argue with you on this, I own and run servers like these and also these little SFF machines and don't see much difference in power draw. Old Dell 2950s, sure, but not the more recent gen servers.
 
immageek said:
Ok, the log file seems to make a big deal over it. Especially since they have a link to a list that shows support for only the new cards. If I never noticed it in the other updates, then ok, but I don't remember seeing it.


No they aren't. Have you even used one? Mine idle at 60 watts. That's nothing. Yes, I know a little SFF HP or Dell are 20 or so watts, but a machine with 10 times the power with 60 watt draw is not "horrific". Add in a 40 watt nVidia card since that's all a passive pci-e slot can handle at best, again, isn't a power hog. I'm pretty sure you're confused on this part. To each their own, but I'd rather have a more useful Xeon server running eSXI and hosting multiple OSes and not needing a separate router, camera server and or NAS, when an all in one will consume less power, that's less of a suckers choice. But, I'm not going to argue with you on this, I own and run servers like these and also these little SFF machines and don't see much difference in power draw. Old Dell 2950s, sure, but not the more recent gen servers.
Click to expand...
There is nothing mentioned about nvidia in the update section. You are confusing it with the blue iris 5 release notes. The nvida cards have been tested and proven inefficient.
Idle wattage is irrelevant, however, for the record, my modern hp elitedesk pc's idle at 6-7w HP Elitedesk SFF G4. The older ones (fourth gen) idle at about 16w. Put your machine under your some load and it will skyrocket. Even a 50w difference translates to 100 per year in some parts of the country. These crappy old space heater servers deserve to be in the trash.
Only fools run old spaceheater servers like the 710 to "save" money.
 
fenderman said:
There is nothing mentioned about nvidia in the update section. You are confusing it with the blue iris 5 release notes.
Click to expand...

This is in recent features for the new version of BI, under the Updates section....
  • Nvidia CUDA support for hardware accelerated video encoding. See Video Encode and Decode GPU Support Matrix for compatibility.
  • Nvidia CUDA support for hardware accelerated video decoding of H.264, H.265, MPEG4 and MJPEG
Not sure what or where you're reading, but I am reading under the update section, not release notes or anything like that.


put your machine under your some load and it will skyrocket.
Click to expand...

With 6, 7200RPM drives running FreeNAS, with Plex running and streaming 2 4K streams it peaks at 120watts. oooo... so power hungry!

Even a 50w difference translates to 100 per year in some parts of the country.
Click to expand...
Ok, so your real beef is with crappy power companies. As it doesn't cost me much more than it did without it to run it. My bill went up maybe $5 a month.

These crappy old space heater servers deserve to be in the trash.
Only fools run old spaceheater servers like the 710 to "save" money.
Click to expand...
LOL. This is too funny. Only fools think these things are space heaters in the first place. Learn how to build a server and they aren't. My custom built Xeon runs cooler than the HP EliteDesk 400 G3 SFF or Dell 7010 SFF I have. When it comes to shear power and multi-tasking, my 710 will destroy that weak little SFF. Why have a bunch of single purpose machines, multiple each of them you have running. Like I said, I put 6 devices into 1 machine and turned off the others, that alone recoups and saves cost. But whatever dude, you enjoy what you want, and I will too. A few extra watts doesn't effect my lifestyle one bit.[/QUOTE]
 
immageek said:
This is in recent features for the new version of BI, under the Updates section....
  • Nvidia CUDA support for hardware accelerated video encoding. See Video Encode and Decode GPU Support Matrix for compatibility.
  • Nvidia CUDA support for hardware accelerated video decoding of H.264, H.265, MPEG4 and MJPEG
Not sure what or where you're reading, but I am reading under the update section, not release notes or anything like that.




With 6, 7200RPM drives running FreeNAS, with Plex running and streaming 2 4K streams it peaks at 120watts. oooo... so power hungry!


Ok, so your real beef is with crappy power companies. As it doesn't cost me much more than it did without it to run it. My bill went up maybe $5 a month.


LOL. This is too funny. Only fools think these things are space heaters in the first place. Learn how to build a server and they aren't. My custom built Xeon runs cooler than the HP EliteDesk 400 G3 SFF or Dell 7010 SFF I have. When it comes to shear power and multi-tasking, my 710 will destroy that weak little SFF. Why have a bunch of single purpose machines, multiple each of them you have running. Like I said, I put 6 devices into 1 machine and turned off the others, that alone recoups and saves cost. But whatever dude, you enjoy what you want, and I will too. A few extra watts doesn't effect my lifestyle one bit.
Click to expand...

Updates are documented in the help file when they are released you can see for yourself. The list of "recent features" on the blue iris website is 1) not really recent, 2) does not mention in what version of the software the feature was added. Not sure why you think it was added with the latest small update.
This was available since the release of version 5 and the link was in the original v5 help file. With respect to power consumption, that is exactly my point, you are running cheap ass old servers that use a ton of power to "Save" money (i know I know, you have a million bux, but CHOOSE to run old servers) when in fact you are not saving anything. Its actually costing you more.
You are further confused. Space heater refers to the heat generated by the unit, that does not change with cooling.
You again, failing to use logic, can place all your vm's on one modern efficient machine. This will SAVE you money. Instead, you use old crap that costs you money. Buy a killawatt meter and see for yourself. You will find that you are a sucker.
Finally, its cute that you compare your machines without comparing the processors.
 
fenderman said:
With respect to power consumption, that is exactly my point, you are running cheap ass old servers that use a ton of power to "Save" money (i know I know, you have a million bux, but CHOOSE to run old servers) when in fact you are not saving anything. Its actually costing you more.
Click to expand...
Except in reality, I AM saving money, and they aren't "cheap ass old servers that use a ton of power". You clearly have never used one, let alone have ever owned one. But ignorance is bliss.

You are further confused. Space heater refers to the heat generated by the unit, that does not change with cooling.
Click to expand...
Again, I'm not the confused one here. System cooling have EVERYTHING to do with heat generated by the system. But since you've never worked on these systems, you don't understand how this all works, especially thermodynamics.

You again, failing to use logic, can place all your vm's on one modern efficient machine. This will SAVE you money. Instead, you use old crap that costs you money. Buy a killawatt meter and see for yourself. You will find that you are a sucker.
Click to expand...
Again, the only sucker is you. I already have a Kil-A-Watt meter, I TOLD you my power draw, it's not my problem you choose not to believe me. And again, one of those dinky SFFs will NOT "run all the VMs I want". With what I am running on one, it'll get choked out in a minute. Those machines simply do not have the core count to do much, let alone the ability to have enough RAM. You clearly don't understand server technology, and that's fine to admit, but I know you won't. Go read up and understand what and how FreeNAS works, what eSXI is and what it takes to stream multiple 4K video streams with Plex. You think I'm dumb, but I'm far from it. I've been doing this way longer than you can imagine.

Finally, its cute that you compare your machines without comparing the processors.
Click to expand...
It's cute that you can't even understand that a quad core i7 that is the max processor in most of those SFFs can't compare to an e5-2650 octa core Xeon or dual 12 core Xeons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom