5.4.9 - June 25, 2021

I just tried 5.4.9.5 and got a 170 error on the very first detection. I got an email from Ken saying that some things had been fixed in this revision, but the 170 error doesn't seem to be one of them. Back on 5.4.8.2 again.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen the error 170, just error 100. Have you been able to nail down the difference or what each means?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sebastiantombs
I have no idea what they mean and I hinted in an email to BI that it would be nice to know.
 
I just tried 5.4.9.5 and got a 170 error on the very first detection. I got an email from Ken saying that some things had been fixed in this revision, but the 170 error doesn't seem to be one of them. Back on 5.4.8.2 again.
5.4.9.5: I got the same thing. Stopped BI service, removed Dark.pt from the customs model folder, unchecked the use custom models, set the the timing of the extra images sent from 1min (old minimum) to 250 ms, facial recognition turned off and have only seen ONE DeepStack: Server Error 100 since.

So I am not sure if root cause is custom models, time out of 10 extra images at 1 second each, or a combination of both.
 
I am using dark.pt and didn't shut it off when I had .9 installed. I'm set at 3 images to analyze and still got the 170 error. I didn't run it for more than about two minutes so that's the only error I saw but that was enough. The image was easily in the detectable region. If it had said "nothing found" I would have let it run, but getting an error right out of the box....
 
  • Like
Reactions: looney2ns
I am using dark.pt and didn't shut it off when I had .9 installed. I'm set at 3 images to analyze and still got the 170 error. I didn't run it for more than about two minutes so that's the only error I saw but that was enough. The image was easily in the detectable region. If it had said "nothing found" I would have let it run, but getting an error right out of the box....

Did you try to turn off custom models and see what it does?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
No. Without dark.pt it DS misses everything, basically, at night that I want an ID of which makes it useless without dark.pt.
 
No. Without dark.pt it DS misses everything, basically, at night that I want an ID of which makes it useless without dark.pt.

I agree that for me Dark.pt brings back much better results.

Wonder why 5.4.9.2 worked with Dark.pt, 10 extra images @ 1 second, but throws server error 100 with exact same in 5.4.9.3 and up?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Did you try dropping the images back to 5 or 6?
 
On version 5.4.9.5:

5 extra images @ 250 ms with "custom models" checked, Dark.pt in custom folder, walked through all my cameras:

3 7/6/2021 9:13:07.529 PM Porch MOTION
1 7/6/2021 9:13:10.039 PM Porch DeepStack: Server error -1
0 7/6/2021 9:13:10.039 PM Porch DeepStack: Alert cancelled (DeepStack: -1)
3 7/6/2021 9:13:37.148 PM Shed MOTION
1 7/6/2021 9:13:39.548 PM Shed DeepStack: Server error -1
0 7/6/2021 9:13:39.548 PM Shed DeepStack: Alert cancelled (DeepStack: -1)
10 7/6/2021 9:14:11.251 PM Server ::ffff:192.168.200.220: Connected
10 7/6/2021 9:14:11.264 PM hs ::ffff:192.168.200.220: Login
3 7/6/2021 9:14:14.983 PM FrontTest MOTION
1 7/6/2021 9:14:17.592 PM FrontTest DeepStack: Server error -1
0 7/6/2021 9:14:17.592 PM FrontTest DeepStack: Alert cancelled (DeepStack: -1)
1 7/6/2021 9:14:23.190 PM FrontTest DeepStack: Server error -1
0 7/6/2021 9:14:23.190 PM FrontTest DeepStack: Alert cancelled (DeepStack: -1)
3 7/6/2021 9:15:01.332 PM FrontTest MOTION
1 7/6/2021 9:15:03.816 PM FrontTest DeepStack: Server error -1
0 7/6/2021 9:15:03.817 PM FrontTest DeepStack: Alert cancelled (DeepStack: -1)
10 7/6/2021 9:15:13.215 PM hs ::ffff:192.168.200.220: Logout, 1:02
3 7/6/2021 9:15:32.149 PM Upper_Basement MOTION
1 7/6/2021 9:15:35.056 PM Upper_Basement DeepStack: Server error -1
0 7/6/2021 9:15:35.056 PM Upper_Basement DeepStack: Alert cancelled (DeepStack: -1)



5 extra images @ 250 ms with "custom models" UN-CHECKED, changed NOTHING ELSE, walked through all my cameras exactly the same way (at least order):

3 7/6/2021 9:17:56.225 PM Upper_Basement MOTION
0 7/6/2021 9:17:59.190 PM Upper_Basement DeepStack: person:92% [1,949 694,2304] 2286ms
0 7/6/2021 9:18:00.598 PM Upper_Basement SMS: xxxxxxxxxx@mms.att.net with 1 attachment/s
10 7/6/2021 9:18:06.570 PM Server ::: Connected
0 7/6/2021 9:18:06.856 PM Upper_Basement Push: OK to sgooch’s iPhone
10 7/6/2021 9:18:11.728 PM Server ::ffff:192.168.200.220: Connected
10 7/6/2021 9:18:11.757 PM hs ::ffff:192.168.200.220: Login
3 7/6/2021 9:18:54.883 PM FrontTest MOTION
0 7/6/2021 9:18:56.461 PM FrontTest DeepStack: car:70% [1541,1 1964,139] 970ms
3 7/6/2021 9:19:04.025 PM Drive MOTION
0 7/6/2021 9:19:08.029 PM Drive DeepStack: person:82% [174,333 314,762] 2158ms
0 7/6/2021 9:19:08.029 PM Drive DeepStack: truck:59% [194,601 952,1346] 2158ms
0 7/6/2021 9:19:10.370 PM Drive SMS: xxxxxxxxxx@mms.att.net with 1 attachment/s
10 7/6/2021 9:19:12.378 PM hs ::ffff:192.168.200.220: Logout, 1:01
10 7/6/2021 9:19:17.587 PM Server ::: Connected
0 7/6/2021 9:19:17.772 PM Drive Push: OK to sgooch’s iPhone
3 7/6/2021 9:19:59.182 PM FrontTest MOTION
0 7/6/2021 9:20:05.875 PM FrontTest DeepStack: person:60% [887,163 1014,373] 4359ms
3 7/6/2021 9:20:25.132 PM FrontTest MOTION
3 7/6/2021 9:20:48.888 PM Upper_Basement MOTION
0 7/6/2021 9:20:50.422 PM Upper_Basement DeepStack: person:82% [602,417 1036,1636] 1008ms
0 7/6/2021 9:20:51.922 PM Upper_Basement SMS: xxxxxxxxxx@mms.att.net with 1 attachment/s
10 7/6/2021 9:20:58.218 PM Server ::: Connected
0 7/6/2021 9:20:58.503 PM Upper_Basement Push: OK to sgooch’s iPhone
 
Last edited:
No. Without dark.pt it DS misses everything, basically, at night that I want an ID of which makes it useless without dark.pt.
If you haven’t lately you might want to try DS without using the dark model. It is triggering a lot better with the internal model than it used to. The images below are from a junk camera in complete darkness using only the IR from the camera.

B2A197EC-A338-4376-B474-D1D12206AF17.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I had disabled the dark model with 5.4.9.4 due to the number of deepstack errors that I was seeing. I've re-enabled the dark model with 5.4.9.5 and it seems to be working better at first blush. Only one deepstack error so far on the camera that was constantly generating them. I'll have to keep an eye on it and see how it goes.

Still wondering what the Deepstack codes mean. I've seen mostly 100's, with a few 170's, and I think -1 means Deepstack isn't running.

Also noted that static/occupied is still not working consistently.

Update: I ended up turning off custom models again, it was causing Deepstack errors on other cameras and failing to detect properly.
 
Last edited: